Thursday 25 April 2024

On Anzac Day you’ll hear stories of courage and mateship. It’s a way to rationalise war.

Extract from The Guardian

A man looks at a memorial wall in memory of Anzac soldiers who died during and after the Gallipoli campaign.
Memorial wall for Anzac soldiers who died during and after the Gallipoli campaign. ‘You’ll hear about Gallipoli 109 years ago – though not of defeat or retreat there, or of the 8,000-plus soldiers who arguably died needlessly in that folly.’

Our leaders weave grand, often poetic, narratives around death on the battlefield – and then tragically we let it happen again.

Commemoration – and what has increasingly become an almost ecclesiastic celebration of Australia’s short martial history – on Anzac Day relies on a bedrock of numbers and dates. Dates on which began the wars that killed Australian men and women – horribly on the battlefield, behind the lines, of wounds and disease or, less visibly, behind closed doors or in lonely continental corners by their own hands.

And then there are the dates on which such wars – entered without heed to the lessons of the previous ones and on the coattails of one of two empires – came to an end.

1914. 1918. 1939. 1945. 1950. 1953. 1962. 1973. 2001. 2021.

Then come the less comprehensible numbers of deaths of those on deployment in various conflicts and other operations.

61,678. 39,657. 340. 3. 16. 12. 22. 2. 523. 47. 4. 3.

Some of those numbers are recited at times of national commemoration such as today. It is hard to equate each single one – 1 – with a likely horrible, squalid individual violent death (which is what war always delivers). There are just too many 1s to recount the experiences of, to emotionally account for, to understand the killings and deaths of.

That is why nations weave grander, often more poetic, narratives around all of those 1s, to storify the end of their lives more collectively in war into some sort of relatable – and justifiable – context. For it is only through bigger stories of battlefield courage and endurance, spirit and mateship and loss (rarely “death’’), and of the sacrifice of the fallen (rarely the “dead’’) that we can rationalise what happened in the context of war – and authorise our politicians to do it again.

For every time our politicians commit personnel to conflict or to outlandish spending on military hardware, so that we will be further interoperable with the empires that dictate our defence strategy in readiness for the next war, they are implicitly professing that the human cost of the last one and the one before it was somehow worth it.

There are few certainties in war. But an old and very good adage – that Chesterfield-bound politicians and their tough-talking minions theorise endlessly about wars and then start them so that young people can die in them – rings very true.

It was perhaps illustrative that on the approach to this year’s Anzac Day a tough-talking former security-establishment bureaucrat spoke quaintly of Australia’s need to develop a comprehensive national war plan – a “book of war’’ to “focus the national mind’’. To which I thought the best antidote could well be the development of a “book of peace’’.

Ignore the jingoistic nationalism about Anzac having birthed the nation

But I’ve digressed a bit here. And so back to this day when politicians – who get to commit to the wars and send the personnel – also get to lead the commemorations for the war dead.

You’ll hear a lot about courage and the reasons why so many young people, here and the world over, have somehow become fodder for the war machine, as if by accident. You’ll hear even more about the Australian participation in the invasion of Gallipoli 109 years ago – though not of defeat or retreat there, or of the 8,000-plus soldiers who arguably died needlessly in that folly.

You’ll probably see the lines of football (AFL and NRL) blurred by some who’d equate battlefield courage with sporting field tenacity. But the truth is that football, whatever code you choose, is a far more apt metaphor for peace than it should ever be for war.

Enjoy the match amid the peace, ignore the jingoistic nationalism about Anzac having birthed the nation (contrary to the truth of millennia of Indigenous continental civilisation and the brutal ugliness of the frontier wars and massacres upon which the federation was actually built) and take a minute or two of quiet reflection to consider that every collective reference to the dead comprises a series of individuals. Of ones.

And then, perhaps, consider the others who die needlessly at home because, having served and suffered, the war machine then turns its back on them.

Here is a number you probably won’t hear referenced today: one serving or former Australian Defence Force member has a suicide-related contact with emergency services every four hours in Australia. This is according to new research conducted for the royal commission into defence and veteran suicide.

Perhaps the most disturbing element of this research is its exposure of the suicide-related contact of serving defence force members (almost six times that of the general civilian adult population) with police and paramedics.

Many of them die.

That is a tragically forgotten part of the human toll of war – of the Anzac “story”, if you like.

But it’s always been the case. And until we start thinking differently as a nation about war, nothing will change.

  • In Australia, the crisis support service Lifeline is 13 11 14. Children, young adults, parents and teachers can contact the Kids Helpline on 1800 55 1800. Help for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people is available on 13YARN on 13 92 76.

  • Paul Daley is a Guardian Australia columnist

Watching sport frequently grows the happiness region of the brain.

 Extract from The New Daily


Watching sports, the researchers argue, ‘‘fosters a sense of community and belonging among audiences’’.

Watching sports, the researchers argue, ‘‘fosters a sense of community and belonging among audiences’’.

In 2017, the National Broadband Network commissioned a study that found Australians were watching 60 million hours of sport every week.

The study also found that seven million people ‘‘believe in-home experiences are better than at-stadium games and matches because it allows them to get closer to the action’’.

Apart from the accumulating chip crumbs and beer stains on the carpet, does this matter?

In the grand scheme of things – the tragedy and turmoil of our divided world – you would think probably not. But we’ll come back to that.

Watching a game of footy or cricket or the Olympics at home can be exciting and relaxing. There’s even an argument that watching sports, in the place of your choosing, is good for your wellbeing.

This might serve as a good excuse – or a weak try-on – when other members of the family turn up their noses at your armchair obsession.

But a new three-tiered study out of Japan finds there are health benefits in watching sports, and that these benefits are more pronounced in large gatherings.

Watching sports, the researchers argue, ‘‘fosters a sense of community and belonging among audiences’’.

This sense of connection ‘‘not only makes individuals feel good but also benefits society by improving health, enhancing productivity, and reducing crime’’.

(The ‘‘reducing crime’’ finding doesn’t appear to have been explored. But keep it in mind when travelling home by train with a pack of drunken yobs unhappy with how the game went.)

 The new study

Firstly, the researchers from Waseda University in Tokyo analysed available data on the influence of watching sport on 20,000 Japanese residents.

Short version: Elevated wellbeing was associated with regular sport viewing. No surprise.

Secondly, an experiment, which involved exposing 208 participants to a variety of sport videos, assessed participants’ wellbeing both before and after viewing.

The main finding, again, wasn’t overly revelatory. Widely embraced sports, like baseball (this being Japan), “exerted a more significant impact on enhancing wellbeing compared to less popular sports, such as golf”.

This raises interesting questions about sport as religion that could have been further explored. At what point does a sport’s popularity take on a life of its own?

Also, do ardent fans of less-popular sports, with smaller crowds, experience a different kind of emotional high?

The most interesting aspect of this research was in the third study. This involved 14 participants whose brain activity was observed and measured using MRI neuroimaging. This occurred while the participants watched sports clips.

The brain scans showed that ‘‘sports viewing triggered activation in the brain’s reward circuits, indicative of feelings of happiness or pleasure’’.

But it went further. Participants ‘‘who reported watching sports more frequently exhibited greater grey matter volume in regions associated with reward circuits’’.

This suggested that regular viewing ‘‘may gradually induce changes in brain structures’’.

Notably, that the regions associated with happiness actually get bigger with repeated viewing of your favourite games.

Corresponding author Professor Shintaro Sato said: “Both subjective and objective measures of wellbeing were found to be positively influenced by engaging in sport viewing.

‘‘By inducing structural changes in the brain’s reward system over time, it fosters long-term benefits for individuals.’’

He said for those ‘‘seeking to enhance their overall wellbeing, regularly watching sports, particularly popular ones such as baseball or soccer, can serve as an effective remedy”.

Tuesday 23 April 2024

UNRWA report finds Palestinian aid group has robust neutrality framework, no evidence for Israeli claims of terrorist infiltration.

Extract from ABC News

ABC News Homepage


An independent review of the neutrality of the UN agency helping Palestinian refugees has found that Israel has provided no evidence that a "significant number" of staff were involved in terrorist organisations, despite receiving a staff list annually since 2011. 

The 48-page report, released on Monday, also found the agency had robust structures in place to ensure compliance with humanitarian neutrality principles, although issues remain. 

The United Nations appointed former French foreign minister Catherine Colonna to lead the UNRWA neutrality review in February after Israel alleged that 12 UNRWA staff took part in the Hamas-led October 7 attacks, which triggered the Gaza war.

Israel stepped up its accusations in March, saying more than 450 UNRWA staff were military operatives in Gaza terrorist groups.

In a separate investigation, a UN oversight body is looking into the Israeli allegations against the 12 UNRWA staff.

A woman with short hair, wearing a dark blue blazer, speaks at a press conference.
Catherine Colonna urged the Israeli government not to discount the report.(AP: Hussein Malla, File)

Reuters reviewed a copy of the Colonna review's final report before it was made public.

The report said Israel had made public claims based on a UNRWA staff list provided to it in March that "a significant number" of UNRWA staff were members of "terrorist organisations".

"However, Israel has yet to provide supporting evidence of this," it said.

Israel's allegations against the dozen UNRWA staff led 16 states including Australia to pause or suspend funding of $700 million to UNRWA, a blow to an agency grappling with the humanitarian crisis that has swept Gaza since Israel launched its offensive there.

Israel has long complained about the agency, founded in 1949 to care for Palestinian refugees.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has called for UNRWA to be shut down.

UNRWA commissioner-general Philippe Lazzarini in March warned of "a deliberate and concerted campaign" to end its operations.

Contracts terminated after alleged October 7 involvement

Israel launched its assault in Gaza after Hamas fighters rampaged through Israeli towns on October 7, killing 1,200 people according to Israeli tallies. Israel's campaign in Gaza has killed more than 34,000 people, according to Gaza health authorities.

UNRWA says it terminated the contracts of 10 of the 12 staff accused by Israel of involvement in the October 7 attacks, and that the other two are dead.

The agency employs 32,000 people across its area of operations, 13,000 of them in Gaza.

UNRWA shares staff lists annually with Lebanon, Jordan, the Palestinian Authority, Syria and Israel, the review said, but also noted that Israeli officials never expressed concern and informed panel members it did not consider the list "a screening or vetting process" but rather a procedure to register diplomats.

The report also said the Israeli Foreign Ministry had informed the panel that until March 2024, the staff lists did not include Palestinian identification numbers.

The report noted that UNRWA has "a more developed approach" to neutrality than other similar UN or aid groups.

"Despite this robust framework, neutrality-related issues persist," it found.

It said these included some staff publicly expressing political views, textbooks with problematic content being used in some UNRWA schools, and politicised staff unions making threats against UNRWA management and disrupting operations.

In Gaza, UNRWA's neutrality challenges included the size of the operation, with most personnel being locally recruited and also recipients of UNRWA services, the review said.

From 2017 to 2022, the report said the annual number of allegations of neutrality being breached at UNRWA ranged from seven to 55.

But between January 2022 and February 2024, UN investigators received 151 allegations, most related to social media posts "made public by external sources," it said.

YouTube Is famine already happening in Gaza?

Israel dismisses report, repeats claims of 'enormous' Hamas infiltration

Israel's Foreign Ministry on Monday called on donor countries to avoid sending money to the organisation.

"The Colonna report ignores the severity of the problem, and offers cosmetic solutions that do not deal with the enormous scope of Hamas's infiltration of UNRWA," ministry spokesperson Oren Marmorstein said.

"This is not what a genuine and thorough review looks like. This is what an effort to avoid the problem and not address it head-on looks like."

Ms Colonna, speaking at the United Nations as the report was released, said the panel had been well received by Israelis while conducting its review and she urged the Israeli government not to discount it.

"Of course, you will find it is insufficient, but please take it on board. Whatever we recommend, if implemented, will bring good."

A young man in distress crouches over a young boy covered by a blanket.
The report says UNRWA is pivotal in providing lifesaving humanitarian aid.(AP Photo: Abdel Kareem Hana)

The report stresses the critical importance of UNRWA, calling it "irreplaceable and indispensable to Palestinians' human and economic development" in the absence of a political solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and "pivotal in providing life-saving humanitarian aid and essential social services, particularly in health and education, to Palestinian refugees in Gaza, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria and the West Bank".

UN spokesman Stephane Dujarric welcomed this commitment to UNRWA and said the report "lays out clear recommendations, which the secretary-general accepts".

UNRWA commissioner-general Philippe Lazzarini said last week he accepted all recommendations.

As Israel has called for the break-up of the agency, Mr Lazzarini told the UN Security Council that dismantling UNRWA would deepen Gaza's humanitarian crisis and speed up the onset of famine.

International experts have warned of imminent famine in northern Gaza and said half the territory's 2.3 million people could be pushed to the brink of starvation if the Israeli-Hamas war intensifies.

Some states had resumed UNRWA funding but had requested a reinforcement of existing neutrality mechanisms and procedures.

Following the Israeli allegations against UNRWA staff, the United States, UNRWA's biggest donor at $US300 million-$US400 million ($465 million-$620 million) a year, paused funding, then the US congress suspended contributions until at least March 2025.

Australia paused funding in late January, soon after announcing that UNRWA would receive $6 million out of $21.5 million in humanitarian support, but resumed in March.

Thousands gather to mark six months since start of war in Gaza.

Reuters/AP

NASA’s Voyager 1 Resumes Sending Engineering Updates to Earth.

 JPL Logo

April 22, 2024

Voyager

NASA’s Voyager 1 spacecraft is depicted in this artist’s concept traveling through interstellar space, or the space between stars, which it entered in 2012.

Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech 

After some inventive sleuthing, the mission team can — for the first time in five months — check the health and status of the most distant human-made object in existence.

For the first time since November, NASA’s Voyager 1 spacecraft is returning usable data about the health and status of its onboard engineering systems. The next step is to enable the spacecraft to begin returning science data again. The probe and its twin, Voyager 2, are the only spacecraft to ever fly in interstellar space (the space between stars).

Voyager 1 stopped sending readable science and engineering data back to Earth on Nov. 14, 2023, even though mission controllers could tell the spacecraft was still receiving their commands and otherwise operating normally. In March, the Voyager engineering team at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Southern California confirmed that the issue was tied to one of the spacecraft’s three onboard computers, called the flight data subsystem (FDS). The FDS is responsible for packaging the science and engineering data before it’s sent to Earth.

After receiving data about the health and status of Voyager 1 for the first time in five months, members of the Voyager flight team celebrate in a conference room at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory on April 20.

After receiving data about the health and status of Voyager 1 for the first time in five months, members of the Voyager flight team celebrate in a conference room at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory on April 20.

Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech

The team discovered that a single chip responsible for storing a portion of the FDS memory — including some of the FDS computer’s software code — isn’t working. The loss of that code rendered the science and engineering data unusable. Unable to repair the chip, the team decided to place the affected code elsewhere in the FDS memory. But no single location is large enough to hold the section of code in its entirety.

So they devised a plan to divide the affected code into sections and store those sections in different places in the FDS. To make this plan work, they also needed to adjust those code sections to ensure, for example, that they all still function as a whole. Any references to the location of that code in other parts of the FDS memory needed to be updated as well.

The team started by singling out the code responsible for packaging the spacecraft’s engineering data. They sent it to its new location in the FDS memory on April 18. A radio signal takes about 22 ½ hours to reach Voyager 1, which is over 15 billion miles (24 billion kilometers) from Earth, and another 22 ½ hours for a signal to come back to Earth. When the mission flight team heard back from the spacecraft on April 20, they saw that the modification worked: For the first time in five months, they have been able to check the health and status of the spacecraft.

Get the Latest News from the Final Frontier

SUBSCRIBE TO THE JPL NEWSLETTER

During the coming weeks, the team will relocate and adjust the other affected portions of the FDS software. These include the portions that will start returning science data.

Voyager 2 continues to operate normally. Launched over 46 years ago, the twin Voyager spacecraft are the longest-running and most distant spacecraft in history. Before the start of their interstellar exploration, both probes flew by Saturn and Jupiter, and Voyager 2 flew by Uranus and Neptune.

Caltech in Pasadena, California, manages JPL for NASA.

Sunday 21 April 2024

US House approves long-awaited aid package to bolster Ukraine's war efforts.

Extract from ABC News 

ABC News Homepage


After stalling for months, a long-awaited aid package to support Ukraine's ongoing war efforts has finally passed the United States House of Representatives. 

It includes more than $US60 billion ($94 billion) in aid for Ukraine, as it struggles to fight off a two-year Russian invasion. 

Aid for Israel and US allies in the Indo-Pacific including Taiwan, has also been approved. 

A man sitting in a chair lifts a gavel to bang it on his desk.
House Speaker Mike Johnson relied on Democrat votes to push through a wide-ranging foreign aid package.(House Television via AP)

Ukraine has long called for more support, saying it's running out of air defence systems.

But the bill had been stuck for months. 

The House is controlled by Republicans, who refused to approve more foreign aid unless a deal was struck on border security. 

Some Republicans were also concerned about rising national debt.

In a rare move, Republican Speaker Mike Johnson relied on Democrat votes to get the bill through, as he went forward with the vote despite pushback from his colleagues.

The aid for Ukraine, Israel and allies in the Indo-Pacific was separated into three separate bills, and packaged with a fourth relating to a potential ban of Chinese-owned social media app TikTok

Volodymyr Zelensky sits in a brown leather chair with a Ukrainian flag behind him
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has been warning his country is running low on air defences.(Supplied)

Mr Johnson said it was important the US met its international obligations.

"It's not the perfect legislation, it's not the legislation we would write if Republicans were in charge of both the House, the Senate, and the White House," he said.

"This is the best possible product that we can get under these circumstances."

Since pressing forward with the vote, some Republicans have threatened to oust Mr Johnson, who has only been House speaker since October.

But Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump has voiced support for the speaker and Ukraine's war efforts.

The $US90 billion package also includes $US23 billion to replenish US weapons, stocks and facilities, $US26 billion for Israel including $US9.1 billion for humanitarian needs, and $US8.12 billion for the Indo-Pacific.

The legislative package will now go to the Senate, where the Democrats have a majority. 

Democrat Senate Leader Chuck Schumer had told senators to be ready to work over the weekend, in anticipation of the bill passing the House.

Reuters

Saturday 20 April 2024

Gigantic marine reptile identified from fossil found by 11-year-old girl and father.

Extract from ABC News 

ABC News Homepage


A fossil jawbone found by a British girl and her father on a beach in Somerset, England, belongs to a gigantic marine reptile dating back to 202 million years ago that appears to have been among the largest animals ever on Earth.

Researchers said the bone, called a surangular, was from a type of ocean-going reptile called an ichthyosaur.

Based on its dimensions compared to the same bone in closely related ichthyosaurs, the researchers estimated that the Triassic Period creature, which they named Ichthyotitan severnensis, was between 22 and 26 meters long.

That would make it perhaps the largest-known marine reptile and would rival some of the largest baleen whales alive today. The blue whale, considered the largest animal ever on the planet, can reach about 30 meters long.

An artists impression of a large sea creature
An illustration of Ichthyotitan severnensis, which lived 202 million years ago.(Reuters: Sergey Krasovskiy)

Marine reptiles ruled the world's oceans when dinosaurs dominated the land. Ichthyosaurs, which evolved from terrestrial ancestors and prospered for about 160 million years before disappearing roughly 90 million years ago, came in various sizes and shapes, eating fish, squid relatives and other marine reptiles and giving birth to live young.

Ichthyotitan is known only from two jawbones, the one found by Ruby Reynolds and her father Justin Reynolds in 2020 at Blue Anchor, Somerset, and another from a different Ichthyotitan individual found in 2016, along the Somerset coast at Lilstock.

"It is quite remarkable to think that gigantic, blue whale-sized ichthyosaurs were swimming in the oceans around the time that dinosaurs were walking on land in what is now the UK during the Triassic Period," paleontologist Dean Lomax said.

Fossil discovered by young girl and father

Ruby Reynolds, who was 11 at the time and is now 15, was fossil hunting on the beach with her father when they spotted a piece of the surangular. Ruby continued to search the area and found a second piece — much larger than the first — partly buried in a mud slope. They subsequently contacted Dr Lomax, an ichthyosaur expert, and additional sections of the bone were unearthed.

"It has been an amazing, enlightening and fun experience to work with these experts, and we are proud to be part of the team and co-authors of a scientific paper which names a new species and genus," Justin Reynolds added.

Ichthyotitan was a member of a family of giant ichthyosaurs called shastasauridae, and lived 13 million years later than any of the others known to date, suggesting these behemoths survived until a global mass extinction event that doomed numerous types of animals about 201 million years ago at the end of the Triassic.

No fossils of the rest of Ichthyotitan's skeleton have been discovered, but the researchers have been able to discern its appearance based on other members of its family including Shonisaurus from British Columbia, Canada.

The surangular is a long, curved bone at the top of the lower jaw, just behind the teeth, present in nearly every vertebrate living or extinct, apart from mammals. Muscles attached to this bone generate bite force.

Reuters