Monday 16 September 2024

The billionaires who stood outside their fathers' shadows, the 30-year friendship of James Packer and Lachlan Murdoch.

 Extract from ABC News


Lachlan Murdoch and James packer walk and talk, Sarah Murdoch smiles walking in centre. All three on a grand prix track

From business rivals to best friends, Lachlan Murdoch (pictured with Lachlan's wife Sarah in 1999) and James Packer have a relationship that spans more than 30 years. (Supplied: News Corp Australia)

When billionaire James Packer agreed to do an interview about his friend Lachlan Murdoch, my producer and I dropped everything to fly to Las Vegas. Packer was in town to watch the rugby league's "Vegas Round" extravaganza from the Fox Sports box where Lachlan was playing host.

We knew James could tell us a lot because he knows Lachlan well and they have much in common. They even share a birthday, September 8, although James is four years older.

Composite image Lachlan Murdoch in shirt and tie holding business jacket and Lachlan with father Rupert Murdoch, both in suits

Lachlan Murdoch spent much of his adult life in the shadow of his father Rupert, perhaps the most powerful media mogul the world has known (Supplied: Fairfax)

Third-generation media heirs, Packer and Murdoch have lived parallel but contrasting lives – like twin strands of DNA, they have tracked the same lows and highs, all the while remaining very different characters. Lachlan stayed in his father's business, while James got out. Lachlan stayed married; James has twice divorced.

Composite image James and Kerry Packer and James Packer solo with head down

James Packer inherited his family fortune and media empire at age 38 when his father Kerry Packer died. (Reuters /AAP: Matthias Engesser)

But if we are all stamped early on, the defining characteristic of both men is that they grew up in the shadow of media moguls – in James's case, the late Kerry Packer, long Australia's richest man; in Lachlan's case, Rupert Murdoch, perhaps the most influential Australian in history.

The long shadow cast by their famous fathers has shaped every aspect of their lives. In James's case, it has driven him out of the media, and ultimately out of Australia, the country of his birth. In Lachlan's case, he is only now emerging from Rupert's shadow and may never leave it completely, even after his father dies, no matter where he chooses to live.

Lachlan Murdoch in foreground wearing white business shirt and tie, James Packer in background with serious facial expression

Where their father's butted heads on some business matters, Lachlan and James were able to come together and make deals — for better or worse. (Supplied: Fairfax)

'Lachlan is an amazingly good friend to me'

Packer was comfortably ensconced in the presidential suite at Wynn casinos. According to Packer's adviser, he'd booked a more modest room but Wynn's management recognised the Packer name (the doorman told me everyone had fond memories of Kerry's Sin City exploits) and immediately upgraded him to their best accommodation. It was a two-storey multi-room apartment in the luxury wing of the complex, with its own private pool and garden.

We set up in the big entertainment area, with its own bar. Outside, palm trees bent and cushions flapped on banana chairs as 100kph desert winds howled through Vegas, causing airport chaos. Inside, it was quiet and snug.

 James Packer wears a business shirt and suit jacket and pants sitting in a chair , leaning

James Packer sat down for an interview with Australian Story in Las Vegas in March. (Australian Story)

Accompanied by his new girlfriend and his minders, James was warm and welcoming, if a little awkward about the opulence of the suite. Though his battles with mental health have been well chronicled, James was calm and sharp under the glare of cameras through a long, 90-minute sit-down interview. He knew what he wanted to say about the friend he sees maybe half a dozen times a year.

"[Lachlan] is one of my favourite people in the world," he said. "I adore him. He's been an amazingly good friend to me through good times and bad times."

NRL CEO Andrew Abdo , media executive Lachlan Murdoch and ARL Chairman Peter V'Landys on the field at Allegiant Stadium.

NRL CEO Andrew Abdo, Lachlan Murdoch and ARL chairman Peter V'landys prior to the NRL match between Manly and South Sydney in Las Vegas in March. (AAP/NRL Photos)

Packers v Murdochs: The rugby league war

The bad times came first. James went out of his way to welcome Lachlan to Australia when he came from New York in 1994, a fresh-faced 22-year-old, not long out of college. James invited Lachlan out to a Sydney restaurant, where they were immediately recognised and written up in the gossip pages.

But not long after, they were pitched headlong into the Super League wars, when News Corp tried to privatise rugby league and use it as fodder for its new pay-TV business Foxtel, a joint venture with Telstra. The Packer-owned Nine Network, which held the broadcast rights to the rugby league and was aligned with a rival pay-TV venture, saw News Corp's bid as an existential threat.

Headshot Lachlan Murdoch in 1997, Super League signage behind him

Lachlan Murdoch won legal approval to launch the Super League competition in 1997. (Reuters: David Gray)

It was on for young and old, and Lachlan and James were at the front lines, signing lucrative contracts with players in a race for the best talent in the game. The hostility was intense — Packer describes it as "dog eat dog" and admits his relationship with Lachlan became "strained" — and both sides were in and out of court.

In early 1997, at the height of the crisis, with rugby league now running as a split competition, James invited Lachlan for a cruise on his father's superyacht Arctic P — appropriately, given the circumstances, a converted icebreaker. It was a prelude to peace between the two families.

Lachlan took his then best friend Joe Cross and his brother James. Also on the boat was Kathryn Hufschmid, who would later become James Murdoch's wife. "That's where James and Kathryn met for the first time," Packer recalls. "I also remember that Lachlan and I probably drank too much. And, you know, Lachlan and I have enjoyed over the years having a drink together."

Laurie Daley holds up a large trophy in his NSw jersey

NSW player Laurie Daley holds up the 1997 Super League Tri Series trophy. (Getty Images)

The ground was laid for a reunification of the game to form today's National Rugby League and to divide the pay TV spoils. Foxtel would become a joint venture between News Corp, Nine and Telstra. James and Lachlan's fathers subsequently did a handshake deal on their yachts off New Zealand.

"When it became obvious to everyone that it made sense for the codes to recombine, I think Lachlan and I probably played a constructive role in getting our respective fathers to the table to do that," Packer recalls.

Both sides lost a fortune during the Super League wars and hopes for an international competition never eventuated but the rapprochement initiated by James and Lachlan set the stage for closer collaboration between the two families. "What Super League demonstrated is if the families worked together, we could make things happen," Packer says. 

The next collaboration, however, would test the relationship.

Packers v the Murdochs: The battle for rugby league

'One.Tel was 99 per cent my fault': Packer

"I remember going to Lachlan one day," Packer recalls, "and saying, 'Instead of looking at this small pie that's free-to-air television, why don't we actually think about taking on the big pie?'"

That 'big pie' was telecommunications. These were the heady days of the early dotcom boom and all the talk was about the convergence of media, technology and finance. James Packer persuaded Lachlan Murdoch that News Corp should invest half a billion dollars in an upstart mobile phone company called One.Tel.

One.Tel

Lachlan Murdoch and James Packer with Brad Keeling (left) and Jodee Rich, managing directors of the ill-fated telecommunications company One.Tel. (Supplied: Fairfax)

When the dotcom bubble burst and One.Tel ran out of money in mid-2001, the Packer and Murdoch's companies lost almost a billion dollars combined. It was a very public humiliation for both men and a big hit to shareholders.

To this day Packer takes the blame for the failure of One.Tel, and for convincing News to invest. Lachlan Murdoch had relied on Packer, who was close friends with founder Jodee Rich, and testified during later court hearings that James had burst into tears when he apologised for the disaster in his kitchen in Sydney's eastern suburbs.

"One.Tel was 99 per cent my fault," says Packer, who admits he had a breakdown in the aftermath. "Lachlan was incredibly loyal to me. He saw that I was hurting. I think he took the view that I didn't do it on purpose … and that's something that I'll never forget."

Composite James Packer and Lachlan Murdoch hounded by media

Lachlan Murdoch and James Packer arrive at the federal inquiry into the collapse of One.Tel after the telco was placed into administration in 2001 with debts of more than $600 million. (AAP: Mick Tsikas)

Somewhat surprisingly, the humiliation the two junior moguls suffered after One.Tel's collapse only strengthened the friendship between them.

"One.Tel went broke at the end of May 2001 and September 8th, our birthday, was Lachlan's 30th birthday," Packer recalls. "So out of nowhere, I get this invitation. If I was Lachlan, I think I'd probably never speak to me again. So Lachlan is giving a speech and in the middle he stops and says that I'm there and it's my birthday and he wants to wish me happy birthday. And it was one of the most moving things that's ever happened to me in my life.

"It's easy to be loyal when things are going well," Packer says. "It's when times are bad that you really see who's genuine and who's not genuine."

Making Lachlan Murdoch

A masterstroke leads to Australia's 'best ever media deal'

There was one silver lining to the One.Tel debacle, for Lachlan Murdoch at least. In the aftermath of the tech wreck, which had contributed to the breakdown of investor confidence in One.Tel, Murdoch was persuaded to invest in the website realestate.com.au, which was going broke. News Corp invested a bit over $10 million — about $3 million in cash and the rest in contra advertising — to acquire a minority stake in the company.

It would prove to be an extraordinarily canny investment. That struggling website went on to become REA Group, a digital real estate giant that News Corp eventually took control of and which is now worth around $US25 billion ($37.4 billion).

"REA is, you know, the best media deal ever done in Australia," Packer says. "When I say that I'm saying Lachlan's deal to take control of REA was a better media deal than any deal Rupert ever did in Australia. I'm saying Lachlan's deal to take control of REA was a better media deal than my father ever did in Australia."

Lachlan Murdoch

Lachlan (pictured in 2001) initially invested $10 million in realestate.com.au; that share is now worth $2.5 billion.   (AAP: Dean Lewins)

When Lachlan Murdoch sought to get full control of REA he approached Packer about buying his 10 per cent stake. Packer, still feeling bad about One.Tel, agreed, selling it to Lachlan for a bargain-basement $10 million.

"I wanted to be helpful because One.Tel had been so bad," Packer recalls. "But let me be very, very clear about one thing – I never thought that 10 per cent stake that he bought from me for $10 million would be worth $2.5 billion. And," he continues with a laugh,  "I do feel less guilty about One.Tel because of what happened with REA."

'Underestimating Lachlan is a mistake'

James and Lachlan's third and final joint business venture came at the end of 2009, when they took over the ailing TV network Channel Ten. It would turn out to be a disaster. The network's fortunes plummeted, and the company finally went broke in 2017, costing Packer and Murdoch hundreds of millions of dollars combined.

Although the initial investment was Packer's idea, he refuses to shoulder all the blame for the failure of Channel Ten. "I blame myself for One.Tel," he says. "But Ten, you know, I think we were equally at fault. We both should have been smarter than we were. What we should have both done is just buy more REA shares."

James Packer wears a suit and tie, standing next to Lachlan Murdoch in suit and tie and a yellow scarf

Despite being third-generation media heirs, Lachlan Murdoch and James Packer have chosen very different paths. (AAP: Paul Miller)

While the "misses" of Lachlan Murdoch's business career — especially One.Tel, Ten — have received enormous attention, some of his "hits" have been comparatively overlooked. Through his private company Illyria, he bought the Australian commercial radio network Nova, which has turned out to be a cash cow.

He has also done a series of smart deals since he took over as Fox Corp chief executive in 2019, including buying a valuable stake in sports-betting giant Flutter, and acquiring the ad-supported free streaming service Tubi, which has enjoyed explosive growth in the US and has expanded to the UK and Australia.

While Fox Corp's share price has remained flat since Lachlan took over in 2019, the share prices of comparable media companies such as Warner and Paramount have dropped dramatically.

"I think some people have underestimated Lachlan," Packer says. "I think underestimating Lachlan is a mistake."

What next for the Murdoch dynasty?

The respective histories of the Murdoch and Packer family dynasties may offer a clue to Lachlan's next major move.

James Packer, born in 1967, was the only son of Kerry, who had fought and won his own succession battle against brother Clyde. James never had to compete with his older sister Gretel, who took no interest in the family's media business.

When Kerry Packer died in 2005, James was 38, about the same age as Kerry when his own father died. Within a year, James Packer had begun the sell-down of the family's media assets, culminating in his 2013 exit from the industry altogether to focus exclusively on the Crown casino business. The $9 billion sale of Crown to Blackstone two years ago has left Packer free to invest wherever he chooses.

Rupert, Lachlan, James Murdoch sit at a press conference table wearing suit and ties. Rupert at centre in front of microphone

Rupert Murdoch is locked in a legal battle in an attempt to secure Lachlan control over his assets rather than sharing with all of his children. (Supplied: News Corp)

Lachlan Murdoch, by contrast, worked for his father on and off for 30 years before taking over the family business. And even now his father, at 93, takes a keen interest in the companies' affairs. Packer shared a meal with Rupert and Lachlan a few weeks before our interview and I asked if Rupert seemed to be enjoying retirement. "He had a suit on," Packer observed with a smile.

Unlike Packer's sister Gretel, Lachlan's two siblings – older sister Elisabeth and younger brother James – have been actively involved in the family business and at times jockeyed for position.

Lachlan and James Murdoch shared power in the company until 2019, when many of the assets were sold off to Disney. After that sale, James left the family business. Lachlan and Rupert were in charge of the companies that remained – Fox Corporation, which owns Fox News, and News Corp., which includes the global newspaper assets.

Since James Murdoch's departure, the relationship between the brothers has deteriorated.

James, Liz, Rupert, Lachlan Murdoch stand and smile

Rupert Murdoch in happier times with his three children James, Elisabeth and Lachlan, 2007. (Getty Images)

Packer acknowledges the deep political differences between Lachlan and his brother James. "I think Lachlan is pretty conservative. I think James — and I hope I don't say the wrong thing here — sometimes is embarrassed by Fox News. I don't think Lachlan is embarrassed by Fox News; I think Lachlan's proud of Fox News. That's probably one of the reasons why Lachlan is where he is, and James isn't."

Under the terms of the Murdoch Family Trust, once Rupert dies Lachlan will share control of the media empire equally with Elisabeth, James and his older half-sister Prudence, the product of Rupert Murdoch's first marriage. That arrangement, however, is currently being challenged by Lachlan and Rupert, who are attempting to guarantee Lachlan's control of the family's media assets after Rupert's death.

It's an explosive development in a succession battle that has bubbled away for decades and there's no doubting what side James Packer is on.

"I've met James a couple of times, I've met Liz a few times and I've met Lachlan a hundred times. I got on Team Lachlan a long time ago. I'm Team Lachlan."

Part two of the Australian Story series – Making Lachlan Murdoch: Money – airs tonight at 8 on ABCTV and  ABC iview.

Stream part 1 now on YouTube and ABC iview

Sunday 15 September 2024

Russia and Ukraine exchange 206 prisoners of war in eighth swap brokered by UAE.

Extract from ABC News


A man with a shaved head wears the Ukraine flag around his neck while making the "peace" sign.

A Ukrainian prisoner of war celebrates the swap. (AFP: Ukrainian Presidential Press Service)

In short:

The United Arab Emirates has mediated an exchange of 206 prisoners of war between Russia and Ukraine, Emirati state news agency WAM said on Saturday.

Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Russia's defence ministry both confirmed that each country took home 103 POWs in the swap.

What's next?

Russia's defence ministry said Russian returned POWs were being offered medical treatment after the swap.

The United Arab Emirates has mediated an exchange of 206 prisoners of war between Russia and Ukraine, Emirati state news agency WAM said on Saturday.

Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Russia's defence ministry both confirmed that each country took home 103 POWs in the swap.

"Our people are home," Mr Zelenskyy said on the Telegram messaging app. 

"We have successfully brought back another 103 warriors from Russian captivity to Ukraine."

He posted pictures of servicemen wrapped in the national blue and yellow flag, hugging each other, talking on mobile phones and posing for group photographs at an undisclosed location.

Dmytro Lubinets, Ukraine's ombudsman, posted a short video on the Telegram messaging app showing the servicemen standing in front of a bus and shouting, "Glory to Ukraine."

He said the majority of the freed Ukrainians had been in Russian captivity since the early days of the invasion.

Rows of people wearing the Ukraine flag around their necks and backs, seen from one side.

Mr Zelenskyy posted pictures of servicemen wrapped in the national blue and yellow flag. (Reuters: Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy Via Telegram)

Russia's defence ministry said the POWs they were bringing home "are on the territory of the Republic of Belarus, here they are being provided with the necessary psychological and medical assistance, as well as an opportunity to contact their relatives".

It said the Russian soldiers exchanged on Saturday had been taken prisoner in Russia's Kursk region.

Ukrainian forces captured territory there last month in their first major incursion into Russia.

Saturday's swap was the third since the incursion.

Ukrainian officials have previously said its troops had captured at least 600 Russian soldiers during the incursion, and that this would help it secure the return of captured Ukrainians.

Mr Lubinets said that Kyiv had so far secured the return of 3,672 Ukrainians in 57 exchanges.

This POW swap marks the second between Russia and Ukraine in two days, and the eighth mediated by the UAE.

A POW swap which the UAE brokered two weeks ago saw Russia and Ukraine exchange 115 prisoners each.

Despite ongoing hostilities, Russia and Ukraine have managed to swap hundreds of POWs throughout the two-and-half-year conflict — often in deals brokered by the UAE, Saudi Arabia or Turkey.

Reuters/AFP

Israeli strike on Gaza City home kills 11 people, civil defence agency says.

 Extract from ABC News

A tank flying the flag of Israel drives on a street surrounded by destroyed buildings.

The Israeli military had no immediate comment on the strike. (Reuters: Amir Cohen)

In short:

An IDF air strike on a Gaza City house where displaced Palestinians were taking refuge has killed 11 people, Gaza's civil defence ministry said.

The strike — on a house near the Shujaiya school in the Al-Tuffah neighbourhood — took place at around 1am local time.

At least 10 other people have reportedly also died in air strikes across Gaza overnight.

Gaza's civil defence agency said on Saturday that an Israeli military air strike hit a house in Gaza City where displaced Palestinians had taken refuge overnight, killing 11 people.

Palestinian news agency WAFA earlier reported a death toll of 10.

"We have recovered the bodies of 11 martyrs, including four children and three women, after an Israeli warplane hit a three-storey house of the Bustan family," civil defence agency spokesperson Mahmud Bassal said.

The strike — on a house near the Shujaiya school in the Al-Tuffah neighbourhood of eastern Gaza City — took place at around 1am local time, he said.

"Several families had taken refuge in the house targeted with a single missile without any prior warning," Mr Bassal said, adding that many others were wounded.

In an earlier statement, Mr Bassal said rescuers were continuing to search for those missing after the strike.

The IDF made no immediate comment on the strike.

Mr Bassal said the IDF carried out similar strikes in some other parts of the territory overnight, killing at least 10 people.

Five people were killed in north-western Gaza City when an air strike hit a group of people near Dar Al-Arqam school, he said.

Three others were killed in a strike in the Al-Mawasi area of the Khan Yunis, Mr Bassal added.

The war in Gaza broke out after the October 7 attack by Hamas on southern Israel which resulted in more than 1,200 deaths, Israeli authorities say.

Israel's retaliatory military campaign has so far killed at least more than 40,000 people in Gaza, according to the Palestinian health ministry.

AFP/Reuters

Saturday 14 September 2024

What are Storm Shadow missiles and why are they crucial for Ukraine?

 Extract from BBC

Frank Gardner
BBC security correspondent
Getty Images A Storm shadow missile stands against the backdrop of some grey clouds with people wandering around looking at it from the opposite side of the camera.,
Getty Images
The UK has supplied Storm Shadow long-range missiles to Ukraine after a request from Kyiv for its fight against invading Russian forces

There are strong indications that the US and UK are poised to lift their restrictions within days on Ukraine using long-range missiles against targets inside Russia.

Ukraine already has supplies of these missiles, but is restricted to firing them at targets inside its own borders. Kyiv has been pleading for weeks for these restrictions to be lifted so it can fire on targets inside Russia.

So why the reluctance by the West and what difference could these missiles make to the war?

What is Storm Shadow?

Storm Shadow is an Anglo-French cruise missile with a maximum range of around 250km (155 miles). The French call it Scalp.

Britain and France have already sent these missiles to Ukraine - but with the caveat that Kyiv can only fire them at targets inside its own borders.

It is launched from aircraft then flies at close to the speed of sound, hugging the terrain, before dropping down and detonating its high explosive warhead.

Storm Shadow is considered an ideal weapon for penetrating hardened bunkers and ammunition stores, such as those used by Russia in its war against Ukraine.

But each missile costs nearly US$1 million (£767,000), so they tend to be launched as part of a carefully planned flurry of much cheaper drones, sent ahead to confuse and exhaust the enemy’s air defences, just as Russia does to Ukraine.

They have been used with great effect, hitting Russia’s Black Sea naval headquarters at Sevastopol and making the whole of Crimea unsafe for the Russian navy.

Justin Crump, a military analyst, former British Army officer and CEO of the Sibylline consultancy, says Storm Shadow has been a highly effective weapon for Ukraine, striking precisely against well protected targets in occupied territory.

"It’s no surprise that Kyiv has lobbied for its use inside Russia, particularly to target airfields being used to mount the glide bomb attacks that have recently hindered Ukrainian front-line efforts," he says.

Why does Ukraine want it now?

Ukraine’s cities and front lines are under daily bombardment from Russia.

Many of the missiles and glide bombs that wreak devastation on military positions, blocks of flats and hospitals are launched by Russian aircraft far within Russia itself.

Kyiv complains that not being allowed to hit the bases these attacks are launched from is akin to making it fight this war with one arm tied behind its back.

At the Globsec security forum I attended in Prague this month, it was even suggested that Russian military airbases were better protected than Ukrainian civilians getting hit because of the restrictions.

Getty Images Ukrainian emergency service workers extinguish a fire in a factory after a Russian shelling as the Russia-Ukraine war continues in Kostiantinivka, Ukraine.
Getty Images
Ukraine is under daily bombardment

Ukraine does have its own, innovative and effective long-range drone programme.

At times, these drone strikes have caught the Russians off guard and reached hundreds of kilometres inside Russia.

But they can only carry a small payload and most get detected and intercepted.

Kyiv argues that in order to push back the Russian air strikes, it needs long-range missiles, including Storm Shadow and comparable systems including American ATACMs, which have an even greater range of 300km.

What difference could Storm Shadow make?

Some, but it may be a case of too little too late. Kyiv has been asking to use long-range Western missiles inside Russia for so long now that Moscow has already taken precautions for the eventuality of the restrictions being lifted.

It has moved bombers, missiles and some of the infrastructure that maintains them further back, away from the border with Ukraine and beyond the range of Storm Shadow.

The Institute for the Study of War think tank (ISW) has identified around 200 Russian bases that would be in range of Storm Shadows fired from Ukraine. Some further additional bases would come into range if the US approves the use of ATACMS missiles in Russia.

But one ex-US official told the BBC that there was scepticism in the White House and the Pentagon about how much difference using Storm Shadow missiles inside Russia would make to Ukraine's war effort.

Justin Crump of Sibylline says while Russian air defence has evolved to counter the threat of Storm Shadow within Ukraine, this task will be much harder given the scope of Moscow’s territory that could now be exposed to attack.

"This will make military logistics, command and control, and air support harder to deliver, and even if Russian aircraft pull back further from Ukraine’s frontiers to avoid the missile threat they will still suffer an increase in the time and costs per sortie to the front line."

Matthew Savill, director of military science at Rusi think tank, believes lifting restrictions would offer two main benefits to Ukraine.

Firstly, it might "unlock" another system, the ATACMs.

Secondly, it would pose a dilemma for Russia as to where to position those precious air defences, something he says could make it easier for Ukraine’s drones to get through.

Ultimately though, says Savill, Storm Shadow is unlikely to turn the tide. Ukraine doesn't have many missiles, and the UK has very few left to give.

And it has been widely reported that, in anticipation of this permission being given, Moscow has already moved the bulk of its air assets and ammunition deeper into Russia, beyond the range of Ukraine’s missiles.

A graphic of a Storm Shadow missile

Why has the West hesitated?

In a word: escalation.

Washington worries that although so far all of President Vladimir Putin’s threatened red lines have turned out to be empty bluffs, allowing Ukraine to hit targets deep inside Russia with Western-supplied missiles could just push him over the edge into retaliating.

The fear in the White House is that hardliners in the Kremlin could insist this retaliation takes the form of attacking transit points for missiles on their way to Ukraine, such as an airbase in Poland.

EPA Wearing a blue tie and navy suit, US President Joe Biden stands next to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky who is speaking at a podium addressing the Nato Summit in Washington in July 2024
EPA
US President Joe Biden and Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky addressed a recent Nato summit in Washington

If that were to happen, Nato's Article 5 could be invoked, meaning the alliance would be at war with Russia.

Ever since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine on 24 February 2022, the White House's aim has been to give Kyiv as much support as possible without getting dragged into direct conflict with Moscow, something that would risk being a precursor to the unthinkable: a catastrophic nuclear exchange.

Nonetheless, it has allowed Ukraine to use Western supplied missiles against targets in Crimea and the four partially occupied regions that Russia illegally annexed in 2022. While Moscow considers these regions part of its territory, the claims are not recognised by the US or internationally.

Putin's claims of Western involvement

One reason President Putin views the use of Storm Shadow as a direct intervention in the war by the US and UK is his belief that Ukrainian troops cannot use long-range missiles systems without the aid of Western specialists.

He told reporters in Russia that "only servicemen of Nato countries can input flight missions into these missile systems," adding that Kyiv also relies on satellite intelligence supplied by the West to choose targets.

Manufacturer MBDA declined to comment on the claims when approached by the BBC, directing queries to the UK Ministry of Defence.

A spokesperson for Ukraine's presidential office also declined to address Putin's allegations, saying they could not comment on "special technical details regarding weapons".

Justin Crump cast doubt on Putin's claim, telling the BBC that if "that claim were true, then Russia would have made it more clearly when the weapons were first supplied, and when they conducted successful and impactful operations against for example the Black Sea Fleet HQ in occupied Crimea".

"The missile is available for export sales; is Russia seriously saying that any buyer would have to have a Nato/UK team to program and use the missile? That must presumably be buried deep in the fine print of the brochure, and wouldn't make it an appealing prospect," he noted. 

Friday 13 September 2024

Voices of Tasmania's Tarkine call for 'no more logging' to protect ancient rainforests, cultural sites.

 Extract from ABC News

Lush temperate rainforest with tall green tree ferns and mossy tree trunks

The Tarkine includes a huge expanse of cool temperate rainforest. (ABC iview: Back Roads)

Marta Dusseldorp closes her eyes as she soaks up the tranquil stillness of an ancient forest.

She is surrounded by towering, centuries-old trees and vivid green tree ferns. Beams of sunlight break through the canopy and create patterns of light on the forest floor.

"Spectacular!" she says.

"Imagine the thrill of walking through forests which have stood for 65 million years."

The Australian actress is visiting Tasmania's Tarkine in the state's north-west for the latest season of ABC iview's Back Roads.

Lush green rainforest, tall trees and tree ferns with two people walking through vegetation

Marta Dusseldorp has been exploring the stunning landscapes of Tasmania's north-west. (ABC iview: Back Roads)

Covering nearly half a million hectares, the area is home to Australia's largest tract of cool-temperature rainforest.

It also boasts rugged coastlines, wild rivers, and large plains of grassland and forested mountains, all abundant with diverse plant and animal species.

But the Tarkine is also resource-rich, making it a political flashpoint for forestry, mining and environmentalists. 

Marta is here to find out how the locals see its future and understand why the region stirs up such passion.

Ancient forests: The heart of the Tarkine

During a tour of Trowutta Arch State Reserve with rainforest guide Rob Saltmarsh, Marta discovers that the Tarkine's spectacular wilderness is a haven for people wanting to connect with an unspoiled natural environment, like its "magnificent" Gondwana rainforest.

Inside this ancient rainforest are plant species that have thrived for millions of years, from the time Australia was connected to the Gondwana supercontinent.

"I think it's one of the big attractions for people to come into Tasmania and come to what's left of our beautiful wildernesses ," Rob says.

"[It] dates back to 500 million years ago, and this is what that giant Gondwana continent looked like — it was covered in this cool-temperate rainforest."

Here, Rob points out a towering myrtle beech tree that reaches approximately 40 metres above the forest floor.

"This would be arguably the oldest tree in the forest — every bit of 500 years old," he says.

Lush rainforest with moss and tree ferns. Camera pans from base of large tree to its canopy

It's estimated that this myrtle beech tree has been living since the 1500s. (ABC iview: Back Roads)

This multi-centenarian giant is part of an old-growth forest of myrtle beech, sassafras, and leatherwood trees that form a dense rainforest canopy.

Below these enormous trees, fern fronds gently rustle, and mosses and fungi flourish along an ethereal walk to the Trowutta Arch.

Formed by a collapsed cave, the limestone rock feature stands above three sinkholes, two of which are filled with water and striking green algae.

Dappled light and leafy tree ferns line the arch and sinkholes, creating an other-worldly atmosphere.

"It's just one of those magic places that you come to," Rob says.

"It's nature at its very best. "

Arch-shaped rock feature in rainforest with lime-green pond at its base

The Trowutta Arch rock feature is one of the Tarkine's many natural wonders. (ABC iview: Back Roads)

Logging risk to Tarkine forests

Just a 10-minute drive from Trowutta Arch, a large tract of the Tarkine's old-growth eucalyptus forest has been clear-felled.

Approximately 20 hectares of towering eucalypts have been cut down by Sustainable Timbers Tasmania, with tree stumps and logging debris in their place.

A wide strip of of felled tree trunks and exposed tree strumps in front of dense forest

The logging of old growth forests in parts of the Tarkine remains a contentious issue. (ABC iview: Back Roads)

The Tasmanian economy benefits vastly from forestry and the state government has strict rules in place to ensure that logging is done sustainably.

The question of how to balance the conservation of the Tarkine with Tasmania's economic interests makes it a hot-button political topic.

But as other Australian states are winding back the deforestation of native trees, Tasmania is still logging wild areas, including a small section of the Tarkine.

The state's Minister for Business, Industry and Resources Eric Abetz says industries have co-existed in the Tarkine for generations through a multiple land-use management model.

He says changing this model would impact "thousands of Tasmanian families".

"Approximately 75 per cent of the Tarkine is already in held in formal reserves with another 19 per cent in informal reserves," he says.

"The region is critically important to the mining and forestry sectors, which support over 8,000 jobs in north-west Tasmania and contribute billions of dollars to the economy."

However, there are calls for the whole of the Tarkine to be given World Heritage and National Park protection.

Rob is an advocate for Tasmania cutting back logging operations in the Tarkine to protect its old-growth forests.

"If we keep woodchipping them and clear-felling them we're just not going to have any left," he says.

Instead, Rob sees a future in harnessing the area's natural beauty for growing tourism and tourism-related employment opportunities.

"I'd like to see more walks in the area for people to utilise," he says.

From his experience as a tourist operator, Rob says people who visit the Tarkine want to see the area's untouched beauty.

"They're not coming here to see the regeneration forests," he says.

"They're coming here to walk through these ancient old-growth forests and we need to preserve more of them."

Foreground with shredded tree trunks and broken branches contrasts lush, thriving forest in background

It is still legal for native forests in Tasmania to be logged. (ABC iview: Back Roads)

An ancient cultural landscape

On the western edge of the Tarkine, buffeted by the ferocious winds of the Roaring Forties, Marta absorbs a breathtaking view of the Southern Ocean from the top of preminghana, formerly known as Mount Cameron.

Preminghana is part of a 524-hectare Indigenous Protected Area and it's where Marta meets Brendan Lowery.

He is one of the rangers who manages the site, which he says is an ancient and powerful place.

Woman standing on top of windy coastal headland with far-reaching beach in background

Preminghana rises above the ocean of Tasmania's wild west coastline. (ABC iview: Back Roads)

"It's where our people can come and have that connection with the country and gather resources," Brendan says.

"It's just a safe place for the Aboriginal community to connect with their culture."

For approximately 40,000 years, the Tarkine has been the ancestral home to the tarkiner people, whose tribal country extends from the Pieman River mouth to the Arthur River.

The area remains a place of deep cultural significance, and Brendan believes its future sustainability requires "balance".

"So no more logging and the farmers around the Tarkine [need] to stop clearing the bush," he says.

"I'd like to see the Tarkine have a covenant placed on it and then I'd like to see it returned to the Aboriginal community.

"It's not about money … it's about connection to country among all of our people."

Weathered mount rises up from ocean surrounded by marsh and wetlands

Brendan says preminghana is rich in Indigenous heritage. (ABC iview: Back Roads)

The Tarkine is dense with Indigenous heritage and cultural living sites like middens, stone tools, petroglyphs and hut depressions that are dotted along the coastline of North West Tasmania.

The Circular Head Aboriginal Corporation (CHAC) welcomes tourism growth in the region to "protect, preserve and celebrate" the histories and cultures of the 12 tribes of the North West, including the tarkiner people.

CHAC spokesperson Rochelle Godwin says that by growing the Tarkine's tourism industry, more visitors could experience and understand the wilderness and culture that have nurtured Indigenous people for thousands of years.

"You see tourism booming in the Northern Territory and in Queensland for Aboriginal culture, and what we have down here is incredible, too," she says.

"We have cultural sites in the North West that people don't even know about that people just walk past.

"Let's tell them what it is so they can actually go and appreciate it and protect it as well."

A man crouches next to a round stone with circular carvings on it on a beach. A beach on a cloudy day with windswept grasses

Petroglyphs — ancient rock carvings — in the Tarkine are considered "older than time" by the Aboriginal community. (ABC News: Manika Dadson)

Pristine rivers Tarkine's lifeblood

For the tarkiner people and the other tribes of the North West, the thriving waterways of the Tarkine have held deep cultural significance for thousands of years.

Brendan and Marta stand amid preminghana's flourishing wetland, which is teeming with life.

Black cockatoos screech mournfully as they fly overhead and a chorus of croaking marsh frogs echoes across lush grasses and pools of shallow water.

As a caretaker of preminghana, Brendan explains to Marta how the waterways of the Tarkine are interconnected and that its wetlands and rivers are dependent on the health of the region's forests, grasslands and heathlands.

Aerial photo of lush green swamp with pool of water surrounded by grasses

The flourishing wetlands of preminghana are vital in maintaining the health of the Tarkine. (ABC iview: Back Roads)

"These wetlands go all the way along the coastline and are like the veins of the Tarkine. The Tarkine's the heart," he says.

Brendan says if the Tarkine's "heart" stops working, "the veins stop running".

"A majority of the creeks and streams in Tasmania run from the Tarkine, so it's really important that we protect it," he says.

One of the best ways to absorb the splendour of the Tarkine is by travelling down the pristine Pieman River, which carves its way through the region's ancient forests.

Aboard the Arcadia, the oldest Huon Pine tourist boat operating in Tasmania, its skipper, Matthew Morgan, tells Marta he wants to see the preservation of the Tarkine's wilderness.

Serene river lined by tall rainforest. A small boat glides along the leaving ripples in its wake

Tourists can enjoy a cruise along the Pieman River, which cuts through the Tarkine's pristine rainforest. (ABC iview: Back Roads)

"It needs to be protected for all time, forever, so that our grandchildren, [and] their grandchildren, get to share this unique experience," he says.

One boat passenger, who did not provide her name, agrees and says the Tarkine's rainforests are a rarity.

"I've been around the world, and I don’t think we realise how lucky we are to have this … rainforest at our fingertips and it's worth looking at and preserving," she says.

"It's one of the most beautiful, amazing places on Earth. "

Stream the Back Roads Tarkine episode anytime on ABC iview or watch the latest episode on ABC TV Tuesday at 8:00pm.