Contemporary politics,local and international current affairs, science, music and extracts from the Queensland Newspaper "THE WORKER" documenting the proud history of the Labour Movement.
MAHATMA GANDHI ~ Truth never damages a cause that is just.
It was past midnight when publican Frank Wust's mobile phone started ringing.
"I answered the phone with my name and the guy on the other end said, 'You be frank, and I'll be earnest.'"
Ernie Dingo's chopper had finally landed. He was here to see the pub.
Celebrity
drop-ins and television appearances have become almost routine for
husband-and-wife team Frank and Debbie Wust over the years.
Truck
drivers, graziers and locals mix with international tourists at the
Walkabout Creek Hotel, owing to its starring role in the opening scenes
of 1986 blockbuster Crocodile Dundee — viewers' first glimpse of Mick
Dundee, bursting through the doors with a vanquished crocodile under his
arm.
It's also the bustling
centre of McKinlay, population 162, a little town nestled between
Cloncurry and Winton in north-west Queensland.
After
a decade at the helm, Debbie and Frank want to start a new chapter, but
say their replacement must be someone who understands that taking on an
outback pub also means taking on a community.
More than a pub
As
temperatures start to tip 40 degrees Celsius in remote western
Queensland, fewer tourists are pulling up on the bar stools of the old
hotel.
But the days are still
busy, Debbie says, with her pub acting as a vital community hub for the
rest of the town and surrounding cattle stations.
"We're the post office, we're the mail run. It's a lot of office work, but a lot of hands on," Debbie says.
A
bulk delivery of letters and packages arrives twice a week, to be
sorted and sent to the town's residents and nearby cattle stations.
Frank wakes with the sun to start the mail run, navigating hot dirt roads and farm gates to deliver to 12 different stops.
Wet
season flooding, arriving anywhere between January to March, transforms
the pub into an outpost, a refuge for truckers stranded on their
routes, and a coordination point for aerial emergency services.
On
McKinlay's main street, Henry "Dicky" Boothman operates a coffee van,
one of the only other businesses in town. With the petrol station now
automated, he says the pub has become more vital than ever.
"It is the community. Without the pub, we don't have a town. It's a meeting place for everyone," he says.
"It's for all the station people to come in and have a beer."
A tree change that stuck
The Wusts remember two lives: before, and after, Walkabout Creek.
Just
over a decade ago, Debbie was an international travel consultant and
Frank a fitter and turner by trade, working shifts at a coal mine.
The
couple had recently returned home to Biloela in central Queensland from
an outback road trip, where a stop-in at an iconic pub in the middle of
nowhere had left them thinking about a tree change.
"We didn't realise it was for sale at first," Debbie says.
"Thinking
this is what we were about to do, we did a lot of research and broke
the news to the kids, who were leaving home, that if they were coming to
visit, this is where they were coming to visit us."
They
placed their remaining school-age son in boarding school, packed up
their belongings, and moved a 12-hour drive north-west to McKinlay, to
start a new chapter in the pub's storied history.
Tourists
pull in from far afield to see the 124-year-old pub, often with
larger-than-life expectations that it will be as it was in the opening
scenes of Crocodile Dundee, Debbie says.
"It is a big thing. It's people's bucket list, to come and see this."
The next era
But after years manning the outpost and maintaining the Dundee legacy, Frank and Debbie want out.
The Walkabout has been on the market for nearly three years, leaving them 10-and-a-half years into their 10-year plan.
"Plenty of people are asking questions, but no follow through," Debbie says.
"No-one's actually come out and had a serious look. But it was on the market for four years before we bought it too."
The
couple are getting on with things — long days are bookended by a cup of
tea together in the morning and a game of pool to end each night.
Debbie
says they will stay on until it sells to the right person, someone who
understands all the hats worn by an outback publican.
"It's got to be someone who wants to live here, because that's what you're doing. You're now a community member. You're engaged.
"It's just waiting on the right person to turn up."
French
President Emmanuel Macron toured the Notre Dame construction site on
Friday afternoon, local time, before the famous cathedral reopens.
The reopening follows five years of restoration work from a devastating 2019 fire.
But some Parisians are puzzled by a celebration taking place while scaffolding still covers the building.
Link copied
The
bells of Notre Dame are chiming again, but scaffolding still clinging
to the cathedral's exterior is puzzling some Parisians who question
whether its grand post-blaze reopening is more symbolic than
substantive.
The French
cathedral was ravaged by fire in 2019 during renovation works,
destroying its spire and roof and threatening to collapse the whole
structure.
French authorities
say it remains unclear what caused the fire that ravaged Notre Dame in
2019, but have suggested an electrical fault or cigarette may have been
at fault.
French
President Emmanuel Macron conducted his final tour of the construction
site on Friday afternoon local time, and described the rebuilding effort
as "sublime".
"You have
achieved what was thought impossible," Macron told workers and officials
who packed Notre Dame after the French president toured the cathedral.
"The
blaze at Notre Dame was a national wound, and you have been its remedy
through will, through work, through commitment," he said.
Mr Macron described the rebuilding effort as a "challenge that many considered insane".
The cathedral will officially reopen next weekend, with as-yet-unnamed world leaders expected to attend.
The
day after the April 2019 blaze that destroyed the spire and roof, Mr
Macron pledged that "we will rebuild the cathedral to be even more
beautiful, and I want it to be completed within five years".
The reality has proven more complex.
The interior will be ready to host visitors and the faithful on December 8 for the first time since the 2019 fire.
But
scaffolding at the base of the newly-restored spire will remain into
2025 and for another three years on the monument's east side, says
Philippe Jost, who is masterminding the reconstruction.
'A half-finished project'
The
blaze and rebuilding that turned the cathedral into a no-go zone for
the public left a literal hole in the heart of Paris, and many locals
are longing for it to be filled by the reopening.
Some,
however, had been expecting the monument to look as pristine on the
outside as officials say it does once again on the inside.
Around
140 million euros ($227 million) of unspent funds remain in the
reconstruction budget, an indication of the scale of work that remains
to be completed.
However,
previous statements reveal the cathedral has received so much funding
for the project that there will be money left over for further
investment in the building.
Cranes and makeshift worker facilities still feature. And while a lot of scaffolding has been removed, tons of it remains.
"It's an eyesore," resident Anne Leclerc says.
"It feels like a half-finished project."
Resident
Jean-Baptiste Lefèvre questions whether the reopening was rushed
prematurely to fulfil Mr Macron's five-year completion wish. His second
and last term ends in 2027.
"It's politics, and he wants it to be finished while he's still president," Mr Lefèvre suggested.
"What's the point of such a big reopening when it's not even finished?
"It looks like a construction zone."
Notre Dame was already a building site
Notre Dame has been a building site for years — even before the fire.
Scaffolding was already in place in 2019 for a previous restoration effort that wasn't completed because of the April 15 blaze.
That structure of melted, twisted metal then had to be cut away before rebuilding could even begin.
Some
of the worst damage was to the medieval monument's roof and its dense
latticework of wooden beams, so complicated that it was nicknamed "the
forest".
The flames also brought down the spire, sending charred debris into the cathedral's interior.
The
charred scaffolding was removed in 2020, and the organ that once
thundered through the cathedral was secured the following year.
In
2023, massive French oak trusses from historic trees in the Bercé
forest in the French Loire region were hoisted onto the building.
A
medieval statue of the Virgin Mary and Child, known as The Virgin of
Paris, returned to the cathedral earlier this year after surviving the
fire five years ago.
Architecture
experts say the pace of restoration has been remarkable, particularly
given the constraints of 21st-century safety regulations and the need
for historical accuracy.
Historians also urge patience, reminding critics that Notre Dame's original construction spanned nearly 200 years from 1163.
"Notre Dame's reconstruction is a sign of hope for everyone," Reverend Olivier Ribadeau-Dumas, the cathedral rector, says.
Restoration delayed
Initial
hopes for a full restoration by 2024 dimmed after COVID-19 pandemic
restrictions and the loss of the project's leader slowed work.
The
late General Jean-Louis Georgelin — the former reconstruction chief —
tempered expectations in 2023, saying the reopening would be "partial."
He
died later that year, with Mr Macron hailing him as the "greatest
soldier" dedicated to restoring Notre Dame "stone by stone".
Mr
Macron's office frames the restoration as a triumph for French can-do,
likening it to other national milestones such as the Paris Olympics.
His tour of the monument on Friday will be his seventh since the fire.
Presidential
officials say he'll see gleaming white finishes of restored stonework,
vaults rebuilt with precision to their original 13th-century design, and
the once-again-radiant golden cross at the altar.
Murals
— including those in the Saint-Marcel Chapel — are as vibrantly
colourful again as when first painted and sculptures of Louis XIII and
XIV glisten with refreshed colours, they say.
After
a Friday ceremony where Mr Macron will give a speech on the cathedral
forecourt, an inaugural mass the next day will signal its return to
public life.
The public will be
welcomed until 10 pm during the first week, with free entry. Liturgical
life then resumes in full from December 16.
The Archbishop of Paris, Laurent Ulrich, expects Notre Dame will quickly surpass its pre-blaze visitor numbers.
He
is bracing for 15 million visitors annually — seemingly confident that
for most, the work that's unfinished won't be a cardinal disappointment.
Dani said it took just four months for her 13-year-old son to become "addicted" to the mobile phone app Snapchat.
"When he woke up in the morning … he'd go straight to the phone," she said.
The
Melbourne mum says she tried to put in place measures to restrict his
usage — even drawing up a "contract" laying out the rules — but it
wasn't enough.
"There was a lot
of notifications, constant notifications coming up on his phone ... you
couldn't hold a conversation with him because he was wanting to check
his notifications," she said.
She said a ban would give her a more powerful reason to say no when her younger daughter asked her to join social media.
"It's a blanket rule — it's like my kid wanting to go and get a cigarette, it's not happening," Dani said.
"It's black and white and that's what I think, as parents, we are really craving at the moment."
The
ABC has spoken to several Australian parents to get a sense of how
those who will be on the frontline of enforcing the ban feel.
Here's what they told us.
One parent says Australia should be 'proud' for taking a stand
When Dani's son asked for a Snapchat account, they agreed to a four-month trial.
He would be allowed an hour daily usage, phones would be kept downstairs at night, and he would only interact with friends.
It wasn't enough.
Soon, 50 friends became more than 1,000, as he joined chat groups from other schools.
Dani said her son's phone pinged constantly and the first thing he did every morning was go downstairs to check his phone.
He was told to remove himself from the chat groups.
"He
was in tears, because when you remove yourself, it says '[they] have
left the chat', and you feel a bit ashamed as a kid, leaving that social
circle and having that announcement," Dani said.
That was one of many tools which, Dani believed, were put in place intentionally to stop children disengaging.
"It's a system that perpetuates the feeling of FOMO [fear of missing out]," she said.
As her son's Snapchat trial period came to an end, Dani read a story about a teenage victim of sextortion.
The
victim had been tricked into sharing nude photos with someone he
thought was a girl his age after only a few minutes of flirting.
He
then received a phone call from a middle-aged man demanding cash or the
picture would be circulated to all of the boys contacts — a threat that
was later carried out.
The boy later took his own life. For Dani, reading that story was the final straw.
When
Dani shared the story with her son and told him he would no longer be
allowed to use Snapchat, she said he was defensive and upset.
"It was about nine o'clock on a Sunday night, and I thought — my child's not going to speak to me for weeks," she said.
"Then
about half an hour later, I heard him trudging down the stairs, and he
came up behind me, and I kid you not — he put his arms around me from
behind, and he said: 'Mum — thank you for being a great parent, I didn't
know how to tell you do, I was becoming addicted to Snapchat, and I
just needed you to be firm'.
But for Dani, the rapid response from the government felt empowering.
"I say power to them," she said.
"I'm so proud to be in the country that puts this at the forefront of their agenda, and that they've listened to parents."
She expected the bill to be more effective for young kids compared to older children who had grown up with social media.
Speaking
to parents of older kids at school, Dani got the impression things had
"spiralled out of control", with those parents describing deeply
ingrained social media addictions in their children.
"They're
all at the point where [they say] 'oh my god, we cannot go back — if I
take Snapchat away from my child they'll be throwing things against the
wall'.
Hopes ban will help stem cyberbullying harm
The
cyberbullying of Colleen's 13-year-old daughter began during COVID,
during the long hours she was in her room attending school online.
"My daughter was called all sorts of names and told to go and kill herself," Colleen said.
Online conversations her daughter had thought were private were also shared on Snapchat.
"I had no idea that it was going on," Colleen said.
"It was heartbreaking."
She
said her daughter's experience had highlighted that teenagers did not
always understand the implications of publishing information online.
"I
don't think their teenage brain has the capacity to understand exactly
what they're doing, you know, to be able to put information or pictures
out there into cyberspace, not realising that you just can never get
that back," Colleen said.
She
said she was "100 per cent" behind Australia's social media ban for
under-16s, but had doubts about the government's ability to impose the
rules on social media giants.
She
said if companies failed to take the ban seriously within six months of
it taking effect, she would like to see strong government action.
"That's when I would expect to see the government handing out fines and really becoming tough," she said.
Colleen also said she wanted penalties extended to parents who knowingly allowed their underage children to use social media.
To other parents, a ban is a 'blunt tool for a nuanced issue'
Perth-based tech and innovation worker Lisa said she did not support the ban, even though she agreed social media was harmful.
Lisa is the mother of a 15-year-old and a 20-year-old.
She said the ban was a "toothless tiger" and "a blunt tool for a nuanced issue" that ultimately would not work.
"The
aims of it, where it's trying to stop students from using social media
is not going to work, because they will just use a different platform,"
she said.
"This ban will never keep up with the technology, and kids are smart and they're resourceful and they will find a way."
Instead,
Lisa favours a corporate responsibility approach, which would force
social media companies to make safer products and acknowledge their
product was harmful.
Scott is a father of three teenage boys and also runs a youth mental health service.
He said he had seen every one of his sons go through a period where their phone use became damaging.
While
Scott preferred to combat screen addiction by providing kids with an
alternative, such as engagement in sport, he said a ban was a "step in
the right direction".
"I think
it's a bold step, I don't think it's a perfect step, and I think it's
going to require monitoring of the outcomes really closely," he said.
He said the world would be watching how the ban progressed with interest.
"Anxiety,
depression, isolation and disconnection is a global epidemic, and a
mitigating factor to that is the disassociation that gets caused when
young people spend too much time on screens and not enough time in the
real world," he said.
Balance needed to maintain 'sense of belonging' social media can provide
While Katarina's children are now too old to be affected by the ban, she thinks both would have benefited from it.
The Melbourne woman has a 19-year-old daughter and 16-year-old son.
She
said while she supported the ban, care had to be taken around young
people who relied on social media for community and support.
"There are advantages to social media use," she said.
"For
a lot of young people potentially who do not have a great cohort of
friends they are associated with at school, it does give them a sense of
belonging."
She said she
wanted lawmakers to pay special attention to Snapchat, because the
disappearing messages allowed bullies to get away with their actions.
She
also felt children would benefit from signing up from an older age,
when they had a better appreciation of the pitfalls of social media.
"When they hit 16, hopefully they have built the skills to be more resilient, to have more self-awareness," she said.
Katarina predicts the success of the ban will depend on parents enforcing it.
"As
soon as you get one parent who may not agree with it, who might allow
their young person somehow on it, then that's going to cause friction,"
she said.
"Parents need to stand united in this."
Snapchat says it can assist with investigations even if messages deleted
Several
of the parents spoken to by the ABC criticised Snapchat for its
addictive nature, the inability to set usage limits, and the fact
messages sent via the app disappeared quickly – making cyberbullying
hard to prove.
Snapchat declined to comment on the parents' concerns.
However, a Snapchat spokesperson said the company had concerns over the legislation.
"While
there are many unanswered questions about how this law will be
implemented in practice, we will engage closely with the government and
the eSafety Commissioner during the 12-month implementation period to
help develop an approach that balances privacy, safety and
practicality," the spokesperson said.
"As always, Snap will comply with any applicable laws and regulations in Australia."
If
a Snapchat user experiences bullying or saw it happening to another
user, they can block the user or confidentially report the account,
chat, or group to Snapchat's Trust and Safety team.
Despite differences in opinion, every parent had one thing in common — all said they would enforce it on day one.
For
Dani, doing so would allow the next generation to experience childhood —
something she felt social media had denied to the last.
"Let's
go back to old-school days where kids communicated, played outdoors,
just had the childhood that we had, and let's give that back to them,
because it's been taken off them," she said.
Children
in war-torn parts of the world are suffering more than before with
violence against them reaching the highest numbers seen in almost two
decades, according to Save the Children (STC).
Its
report has found grave violations against children in conflict-hit
regions increased 15 per cent in 2023, the highest level since UN
reporting of these crimes started in 2005.
Save
the Children listed Burkina Faso, Central African Republic, Democratic
Republic of Congo, Mali, Myanmar, Occupied Palestinian territories,
Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Ukraine as the 10 worst conflict-affected
countries to be a child.
In
2023, there were 31,721 cases of grave violations against children,
representing 87 violations a day, a 15 per cent increase from the
previous year.
The largest increases were reported in Sudan and the Occupied Palestinian territories.
The
report, Stop the War on Children: Pathways to Peace, analysed the
number of verified grave violations against children over two decades
using the 2023 United Nations Secretary-General Annual Report on
Children and Armed Conflict.
The
grave violations included killing, maiming and abduction, sexual
violence, recruitment into armed groups, attacks on schools and
hospitals, and denial of humanitarian access to children.
Children in Gaza wish for 'end to the war'
In Egypt, 18-year-old Khalid fled Gaza after being displaced with his family.
After a difficult journey to cross the Rafah border with Egypt, he said he missed his father, who had to remain in Gaza.
"What
I want most right now, is to see my father … I hope that my father can
come here [Egypt] so that our family can be reunited," he said.
When he was in Gaza, despite being in a war-zone he never stopped looking toward the future.
"I dream of becoming a police officer. I want my dream to become a reality, to succeed and graduate from university," he said.
Looking back on fond memories of his home, he hopes to see Gaza better than it was before,
"What
I remember most about my home, is that there were trees and many
beautiful things. We used to always play with our friends and stay up
late playing and talking.
"What
I wish for now is a ceasefire in Gaza, and an end to the war so that we
can see our families and friends, and reunite with our loved ones."
In Deir al-Balah, south of Gaza, Samar has been living with her children, who are aged 12, nine, five and two years-old.
They were displaced multiple times and now live in a tent.
Early
into the war, in their home in Gaza city, Samar said she fled with her
children after Israeli forces bombed their neighbour's house.
Her children woke "scared and screamed" at the sound of the bombing at 2am.
"I
tried to comfort them and tell them that it's far. That we are fine and
that it's far from us. They kept screaming and saying that it's close
and that the glass is on us," she said.
"Pieces
of glass fell on us while sleeping and dust was in the air, to the
extent that we could not see our own fingers. That's how heavy the dust
and smoke were, and it was just across the street," Samar said.
The experience has had lasting effects on them.
She said when her children hear the sound of a rocket now, one puts their hands over their ears and another spaces out.
"My youngest daughter says [boom] when she hears the rocket noises. She screams other times, or shivers," she said.
The
Israel-Gaza was sparked after Hamas launched an attack in southern
Israel on October 7, 2023, that killed 1,200 people, and took 250
hostages, according to Israeli authorities.
Israel
then launched attacks in Gaza which the Palestinian health ministry
said has killed more than 44,300 people, with many more bodies believed to be remaining under the rubble.
Impact on children in Sudan
In
a refugee camp in south Sudan, mother-of-five Marium lives with her
children after being displaced four times since the conflict started on
April 15, 2023.
Life
in the camps for Marium and her children has been hard, especially
without the children's father, who remained in Khartoum, Sudan's
capital.
Marium's 14-year-old
daughter Aisha has been distressed about the feared loss of her father –
who they haven't heard from since they left Khartoum.
"I
don't know if my husband is alive or dead and this greatly worries the
children, especially my oldest daughter. She loved her father so much,
and living without him all she does is think about him," Marium said.
At
the very start of the conflict in Sudan, Marium was in hospital with
Aisha and eight-year-old Harum, who struggles to control his bladder due
to back problems.
The hospital and surrounding area were attacked, leaving Marium and her two children stuck in the hospital for three days.
"It
was very stressful … The hospital was later bombed, but we were in
there with two kids. Within the country I was separated from the other
children, I couldn't find them," she said.
She said it was a harrowing experience for her and her children.
"One
of my children, the oldest girl, was very distressed because of all the
shooting, and one of my boys was fainting all the time," she said.
Harum
has not received the treatment needed for his back issue and has been
unable to keep himself clean or walk long distances.
This
has put additional financial strains on the family, who have to use the
money they receive for food assistance to spend on additional clothing
for him.
He's been seeking psychological treatment to deal with the stress from Save the Children professionals.
In Sudan, 11-year-old Janat lives with her parents and two brothers.
She wishes the war would stop "to have peace".
"We need security, and a president to rule the country and stop the war."
She’s constantly smiling and loves to tell jokes. Her favourite subjects are Arabic, the sciences and religious studies.
Jannat loves to watch the National Geographic channel to learn new things and is a hardworking student.
"My
wish for the future is to become a doctor and travel the world. I wish
to travel to Korea. They have a developed technology," she said.
"To leaders [I say] stop the war because a lot of children have lost their parents."