Friday, 13 February 2026

Cars submerged, trees torn down, roads inundated: Alice Springs flooding in pictures.

Extract from ABC News


By Gemma Ferguson

A birds eye view of a road flooded, bush on either side.

The flash flooding in Alice Springs left multiple people stranded and in need of rescue. (ABC News: Xavier Martin)

Father finds family's bones in rubble of Gaza house destroyed in air strikes.

Extract from ABC News

What a 566yo coolabah tree in the Gwydir Wetlands could tell us about climate.

Extract from ABC News

A woman drills into a tree.

Dendrochronology involves the use of drills to look at the growth rings in trees. (Supplied: DCCEEW)

In short:

A study provides a record of how a changing climate has shaped the Gwydir Wetlands over centuries.  

The oldest tree discovered on the site is a 566-year-old coolabah.

What's next?

A researcher says the project could pave the way for similar studies across other major river systems and contribute to conversations about environmental water management.

How ordinary life endures an extraordinary war.

Extract from Eureka Street

 Home

Vol 36 No 2

How ordinary life endures an extraordinary war

INTERNATIONAL

 

All is well as long as it goes well. 

Under normal conditions, no one notices the air they breathe. In peace, we are unaware of peace. Just life—ordinary life, nothing more. How precious it can seem when it is under threat.

During blackouts, you acutely lack light and heat. What you have in abundance is time. Darkness is made for reflection.

You’re not drawn to a book because reading doesn’t help. It’s hard to slip from reality into fiction when your fingers are numb and your breath turns to steam. Reality wins. Reality wins, even when it looks like a surreal spectacle.

There are producers, directors and leading stars. And there are billions of extras and spectators. If all the world’s a stage, as Shakespeare put it, there aren’t that many real actors.

According to the screenwriters, there is a war raging in Ukraine right now. There used to be about forty million people there; now only a little over twenty million remain. The sets are burned and destroyed, the landscape is scarred, lives are ruined.

War is something that should never have happened. It has. It’s here. And it isn’t going to stop.

In the spring of 2022, my nephews appeared on my phone screen, calling me from Kremenchuk while I was in Kyiv. These were the days when Russia was retreating from Putin’s failed blitzkrieg. News of the Bucha massacre had not yet surfaced, and Ukrainian cities had not yet been reduced to rubble. The country was celebrating what felt like an imminent victory over the world’s second-largest army.

 

"I had stepped into the other room when one of the balloons burst with a loud bang. When I returned, I didn’t see my granddaughter right away. She was lying under the blanket, her head covered. She stayed there for several minutes—the sound had felt like an explosion to her."

 

Three of my nephews, aged between thirty and forty-five, had gathered at a summer cottage for a barbecue. Passing the phone from hand to hand, they shared childhood memories with me, laughed, and invited me to join them. In their high spirits, the three hundred kilometres between us did not seem insurmountable.

Distracted by work, I replied rather drily. About ten minutes later, we said goodbye. I did not know then that this would be the last time I would see all three of them alive, together — the men I still remembered as boys.

The youngest, a fuel truck driver, was shell-shocked during a Russian drone strike on an oil refinery. The second, a police officer, went to the front. The eldest, my nephew Slavik — a father of three girls — went missing in action in eastern Ukraine.

The last report about him said he had been seen trying to apply a tourniquet to what was left of his leg after it was blown off by an explosion. It was 2024. Russian forces were advancing, the fighting was brutal, and the retreat was chaotic. Slavik had no real chance of survival.

Trying to imagine what he must have felt, lying alone on the ground amid explosions and confusion, I remembered him as a small boy with a splinter in his foot. He was terrified of pain and of the sight of blood. As I carried him home on my back, he kept asking whether he might die from blood loss. I told him no. I would have made a poor fortune-teller.

Slavik never came home. His mother and his wife still believe he is a prisoner and continue to wait for him. Do armies take severely wounded, bleeding soldiers prisoner in war? I have an answer to that question, but I keep it to myself when I speak with Slavik’s mother. I think she knows it too. But who would want to put their child’s photograph into a mourning frame?

A couple of years ago, Kyiv was covered with billboards bearing enormous portraits of fallen soldiers. Beneath their faces were slogans promising that their names would be forever inscribed in the history of Ukraine. I haven’t seen those billboards for a long time now. They’ve vanished—just like the soldiers themselves. They are gone.

If their names were recorded even once, simply listed in a history textbook, how many pages would that take?

Donald Trump once mentioned 400,000 Ukrainians killed. Volodymyr Zelenskyy recently cited a figure of 55,000. It is unlikely anyone knows the real number, or ever will. No one will produce a definitive statistic.

Historians are still arguing about how many people the Soviet Union lost in World War II. Twenty million? Thirty? The overwhelming majority of the dead never found their way into chronicles or textbooks. Many did not even receive a grave. They gave their lives for a country that no longer exists on the map of the world. Alas, history has seen this before.

Will Ukraine survive?

This is what I turn over in my mind at night, listening to the drones and the distant thud of explosions beyond the windows. These thoughts return as I scan the brief reports on the latest airstrike, sparse lines, bare numbers. How long can this continue? And how will it end?

Many years ago, when Crimea was still Ukrainian, I wandered deep into a vast, deserted park and sat down on a bench. Everything around me was beautiful, breathing an almost exaggerated calm, until a strange, rhythmic rustling reached my ears.

I leaned down and looked beneath the bench. A cat was tearing at a pigeon. One wing was beating convulsively against the ground. That frantic sound was what had unsettled me. The other wing was already broken.

I chased the cat away and lifted the bird into my hands. It was mangled, but still alive. I could feel the rapid beating of its heart, the warmth of its blood.

The cat sat a short distance away, watching, licking its lips. I had taken its prey, but I could not save it. It was already too late. All I could do was hold the pigeon and watch it die.

I think of this every time another Western leader addresses Ukraine with words of encouragement and promises of help. I want to shout at them: don’t be late.

The West is helping. There are aid packages, votes, summits, negotiations. But the rhythm of diplomacy is measured in weeks — if not months — while the rhythm of war is measured differently.

Bullets and artillery shells travel at speeds approaching 800 metres per second, several times faster than a jet-powered drone or a glide bomb. A ballistic missile moves faster still, reaching up to seven kilometres per second.

When a night-time warning arrives that Russian MiG-31s have taken off for launch positions, few people rush to shelters. To do so, you would have to dress warmly, wake and calm your children, gather your things, and make your way down from the fifth, tenth, or twenty-fifth floor. Even if you are young and quick, this would likely take longer than the missile’s flight time.

All that remains is to stay where you are, wait, and trust the thickness of your apartment walls. They will not save you from a direct hit. At best, they might stop shrapnel and debris. In theory.

Two rounds of peace talks in Abu Dhabi lasted four days and led nowhere. How many bullets, shells, drones, and missiles were launched during that time and how many of them reached their targets?

The other day, I brought my little granddaughter a set of balloons. While her parents were at work, we blew them up and spent some time tossing them back and forth, laughing.

I had stepped into the other room when one of the balloons burst with a loud bang. When I returned, I didn’t see my granddaughter right away. She was lying under the blanket, her head covered. She stayed there for several minutes—the sound had felt like an explosion to her.

I hugged her and told her that everything was all right.

“You mean the war is over?” she asked, hopefully.

I had to tell her no.

“Then how can it be good,” my granddaughter asked, “if everything is bad?”

She is seven now. She was three when the war began. What stories from her childhood will she one day tell her own grandchildren? 

 


Sergey Maidukov is a Ukrainian writer, author of Life on the run and Deadly bonds, written for US publishing house Rowman & Littlefield (Bloomsbury). Both were written in English in the midst of war. His journalism has appeared in numerous Western publications.

 

Why Palestinian peace activists receive threats.

 Extract from Eureka Street

  • John Aziz
  • 12 February 2026                                 

 

I was greatly saddened when I heard the story of Lama Dalloul, a Palestinian peace activist from Gaza:

 

 

I transcribed this video (originally from Builders of the Middle East) in case you want to read it, rather than listen to it.

Lama says:

 

I’m Palestinian. I’m an activist, and I love animals. For the past two years, I fought to find a way out. Some people called it betrayal, but I was simply looking for a better, safer future. I spent my whole life in Gaza, growing up there, I saw people lose their job, their security, their future, just for saying what they thought. 

Then October 7 happened and changed everything… Not only was I living in fear of bombardment or attacks, but I was also seeing injustice every day. I couldn’t be part of that silence. So I turned to TikTok and started documenting my life, the war, the fear. It was my way to escape reality. 

I also spoke about peace, about not choosing hate, although I got some support, it didn’t take long before I started getting hateful DMs, comments and even threats of my life. 

And I honestly got scared I had to leave behind my family, my friends, my country, even my cats… 

I believe that the people of Gaza shouldn’t have to live in fear just to speak their truth. I believe that the people of Gaza deserve dignity and freedom.

 

I have my own experiences of this phenomenon, too.

After October 7th, when I started talking about my belief in peace and coexistence, I immediately received an outpouring of support from some people. I remain grateful for that. But there were also vast quantities of anger, condemnation and — yes — threats, accusations of treachery, accusations that I am a traitor, or a Mossad agent, or some other nonsense. 

At first, I found it bewildering. Peace and coexistence are not extremist positions. They are really quite a logical position. Neither side is going to disappear. Israelis and Palestinians must learn to share this land together. However long that takes.

 

'Once you’ve been recast as an enemy or a traitor, there’s less need to engage with your words. The focus shifts to punishing you for speaking, to try and push you down. They will lie, misinterpret, distort, try to hack into your social media accounts, threaten your family, anything.'

 

So why let grief curdle into dehumanisation, hate, and the perpetuation or worsening of conflict?

Dehumanisation and hate are poisonous. They are brain-rotting. They convince people to commit themselves to causes of destruction and death. They convince people to commit unspeakable acts of barbarity.

Why continue with this miserable reality? When peace comes, things get better. Economies grow. Cities flourish. Trade soars. People gain back the time and space to complete their education, get a job, start a family without worrying about bombs dropping on their heads, or having to evacuate. You get a post-war boom. You get a chance for normality.

And yet for some people, peace is treated as an intolerable idea. 

It took me a while to realise that threats are rarely about what you actually said (or even the twisted misrepresentations that people misinterpreted you to say). They’re about what your existence represents. When you insist that Israelis and Palestinians are both human, that both deserve safety, that neither side has a monopoly on pain or innocence, you disrupt the core story where one side is wholly innocent, and the other wholly guilty. And if someone’s identity has become welded to that story then your ideas feel like an attack.

Once you’ve been recast as an enemy or a traitor, there’s less need to engage with your words. The focus shifts to punishing you for speaking, to try and push you down. They will lie, misinterpret, distort, try to hack into your social media accounts, threaten your family, anything.

There is also a darker truth: peace threatens power. 

In every long conflict, there are individuals and groups — some organised, some informal — who benefit from permanent hostility. They benefit socially, because common hatreds are used as a kind of group identity. They benefit psychologically, because hatred offers certainty and direction. And sometimes they benefit materially or politically, because outrage is an engine that can be harnessed for money. 

In other words, there are a lot of groups making a lot of money, and gaining a lot of power from perpetuating the conflict. Not least Hamas, who have made billions from siphoning aid, and acting like a protection racket.

A person speaking about coexistence is a problem for that nefarious ecosystem. A person speaking about coexistence threatens those who are getting rich from war, and from dehumanising propaganda.

The internet intensifies all of this. It amplifies the worst impulses. It allows people to perform righteousness for applause, to attack strangers with little or no consequence. Political causes — especially deeply divisive and entrenched ones — are used by bullies and trolls as an excuse to be extravagantly mean in ways that they would not otherwise be able to get away with. 

But I refuse to back down. I refuse to bend or apologise. As I said, neither side is going to disappear. There is no solution without a resolution.

No matter how long it takes to get there, the ideologies of endless conquest and counterpunching will be consigned to the scrap heap of history.

 

This piece originally apprared on John Aziz's substack here and was used with permission. 

 


John Aziz is a British-Palestinian musician, peace activist, and analyst of Middle East politics and history.