Contemporary politics,local and international current affairs, science, music and extracts from the Queensland Newspaper "THE WORKER" documenting the proud history of the Labour Movement.
MAHATMA GANDHI ~ Truth never damages a cause that is just.
Co-founder and editor of the 60s counterculture magazine Oz
Richard Neville, right, with his co-editors James Anderson, left, and
Felix Dennis, during the Oz obscenity trial at the Old Bailey, 1971.
Photograph: Popperfoto/Getty Images
In early 1963, Richard Neville, who has died aged 74, gathered
together a band of fellow students at his parents’ home in suburban
Sydney to put together a satirical magazine. Along with Richard Walsh,
the artist Martin Sharp and others, Neville created Oz,
a 16-page black-and-white publication. The first issue appeared on
April Fools’ Day, with 6,000 copies selling out by lunchtime.
Using humour to mock the conservative nature of Australian society
and show up the hypocrisy of its sexual mores, that first issue kicked
off with a piece on the history of the chastity belt, as well as a long
feature by Richard exposing the dangers of back-street abortion – at a
time when abortion was not only illegal, but a taboo subject. Later
issues would focus on censorship, homosexuality, police brutality and
the “White Australia” policies of the Australian government.
Oz immediately attracted the ire of the establishment. Shortly after
the third issue appeared, the three editors were charged with bringing
out an indecent and obscene publication. Advised, wrongly, that they
would get off if they pleaded guilty, they did so, but were duly charged
and fined.
In March 1964, they were again accused of obscenity, for issue No 6,
which carried a cover photograph of Richard and two mates pretending to
urinate into a wall fountain, on the side of the new P&O building in
Sydney, which had recently been opened by the prime minister, Robert Menzies.
This time the editors pleaded not guilty. They were tried and
convicted, and given prison sentences of between three and six months
with hard labour. They eventually won on appeal, on the basis that the
magistrate had misdirected the jury, but the case dragged on for two
years.
By now Richard was ready to travel. In 1966 he and Sharp took the
overland route through Asia to London, where Richard met up with his
girlfriend, Louise Ferrier, who had left Sydney the year before. There
he found the lure of starting a London Oz irresistible. He recruited
writers and artists, and brought out the first issue in February 1967.
Aided by the visual brilliance of Sharp and the flexibility of offset
litho printing to experiment with colour, Oz became the iconic magazine
for that loose set of attitudes known as the counterculture.
Energised by the optimism of the era, Richard gave Oz an eclectic,
imaginative breadth, with a pioneering internationalism and an
opposition to prejudice, and subjects ranging from American Yippies to
student activists, from mystical dreamers to new age ecologists, which
meant the magazine was only sometimes as superficial as the sloganeering
banner of sex, drugs and rock’n’roll suggested.
He had an Australian knack of brushing aside the systemic barriers of
British class. He published New Left writers but disagreed with their
revolutionary politics, declaring himself against all “isms” and
abhorring any ideology backed by violence. Yet by 1970 he acknowledged
that violence had erupted on the edges of the alternative society. To
address this, Richard was preparing his “End of an Era” issue of
the magazine when, in 1971, he had to endure the notorious Oz
obscenity trial in the UK for No 28 (May 1970), put together
by schoolchildren,
who had responded to an ad in Oz to create their own issue. Linked to
an additional charge of conspiring to corrupt public morals, for
which the penalty had no limits, the trial went on for a
nerve-racking six weeks. John Mortimer QC defended Richard’s UK co-editors, Jim Anderson and Felix Dennis,
while Richard defended himself, displaying oratorical skill. Humorous
exchanges during the case related, for example, to the Rupert Bear comic
strip: one of the schoolboy contributors had collaged Rupert on to a Robert Crumb cartoon. A pop single, God Save Oz, by John Lennon and Yoko Ono, contributed to the Oz defence fund.
Public outrage at the long prison sentences handed down to the
editors ignited after they emerged from remand with their hippy locks
shorn. After rigorous further work by Geoffrey Robertson, junior counsel to the defence, the case was won on appeal, again on the basis that the judge had misdirected the jury.
In
the same year, Richard co-founded the newspaper Ink, to bridge the gap
between the underground and the mainstream press. It folded in February
1972. Exhausted by the trial, he shed the editor’s mantle. The
final issue of Oz was published in November 1973.
Richard was born in Sydney, an interesting place to grow up in the
postwar years. Despised as a cultural nowheresville by Britain, but
valued by migrants from war-torn Europe, it was a city of equality,
promise and low unemployment. But in Australia the indigenous population
had no vote, and there was stifling censorship of the arts, widespread
police corruption, and a prime minister who showed his support for the
US invasion of Vietnam by reintroducing conscription in the form of a
birthday ballot.
Richard was the youngest of three children of Betty (nee
MacKnight) and Clive Neville. His father was a bookkeeper who had
commanded an infantry battalion in the second world war – earning the
nickname Colonel – and then became managing director of Country Life
newspaper. Richard was sent as a boarder to Knox grammar school in
Wahroonga and, following a period working in advertising, enrolled for
an arts degree at the University of New South Wales, Sydney.
There he found his metier as editor of the student newspaper,
Tharunka, turning it into a platform for student pranks. He met Walsh, a
Sydney University student also involved in journalism, who became a
sparring companion with a wit to match his own and, on a road trip to a
student editors’ conference in Adelaide, the idea to launch a magazine
of dissent was born.
Richard Neville on Climate v the Rich
Richard applied his charm and enthusiasm to the co-editorship of Oz
as well as flair, originality and a steadfast loyalty to its values of
tolerance and freedom. I first met him when I went to work as the
magazine’s secretary in 1964. I observed his wide smile, his generous
brown eyes and dark hair, already longer than the norm, and responded to
his humour by making a joke of my own, which surprised me. He was a man
who inspired others; he was a catalyst and innovator, who displayed a
charisma that was sometimes the envy of others.
In the years following the end of Oz, Richard wrote freelance pieces
from an alternative perspective for several newspapers. In 1974 he met
Julie Clarke, a writer and journalist, and they moved to New York and
then to Sydney, where they married in 1980. Together they wrote a
biography of Charles Sobhraj (1979), who murdered young backpackers
travelling in Asia in the 1970s. It was a harrowing experience for
Richard, who felt he had come face to face with the antithesis of the
counterculture.
At
the end of the 60s, he had posed the tricky question: out of the
alternative society, what exactly had “the greatest relevance for the
future”? In his book Playpower (1970), he had predicted the rise of
computer technology and envisaged more leisure, hence the need to
develop the “politics of play”. But in the digital world of the 21st
century, he asked: what if “the promise of free time turns out to be
stealing our time?” In these later years, as writer, journalist,
television presenter and speaker, he sought to trace the footprints of
the future, framing the urgent questions as a “race between
self-discovery and self-destruction”.
In the 1980s, Richard appeared on the Australian TV programme The
Midday Show as a cultural commentator, and then created and hosted his
own show, Extra Dimensions, in which he explored the subject of
sustainability, searching for promising alternative projects and offbeat
ventures, although his penchant for being the entertainer occasionally
took centre stage.
His life changed again after a serious car accident in the mid-90s,
which damaged Julie’s spine. Richard became the sole breadwinner and
home carer. He continued to write articles and books, including Hippie
Hippie Shake (1995), a memoir of the 60s, and in 1997 he co-launched the
Australian Futures Foundation, to help organisations plan for the
future and engage traditional businesses and environmentalists in
dialogue. For more than a decade he wrote a blog underlining the enviromental as well as the human cost of militarism and war.
He is survived by Julie and their daughters, Lucy and Angelica. Marsha Rowe Geoffrey Robertson writes: Richard Neville reached
the pinnacle of his influence in the summer of 1971, on his release from
prison on bail after an Oz trial that had produced more letters to the
Times than the Suez crisis. His trademark hippy hair newly cut by the
prison barber, he was rushed to the BBC studios and accorded an overly
respectful interview by David Dimbleby,
agog for further details of his “alternative society” condemned by the
prosecution as involving “dope, rock’n’roll and fucking in the streets”.
It turned out to be a commitment to sexual equality, rock’n’roll and
human rights. One of his aphorisms was picked up by Tony Blair, 25 years
later, for his New Labour election campaign: “As Richard Neville said,
there is only an inch of difference between us and the Conservatives,
but it is an inch worth living in.”
Oz (with a nod to the Wizard) was a late 60s counterculture magazine
with specific issues directed to arguing for the rights of oppressed
groups – women, black people, gay people and schoolchildren. It was the
last of these that gave Scotland Yard the opportunity to pounce, when
bright teenagers were given the chance to edit a Schoolkids Oz. They
railed against paedophile teachers and mischievously depicted Rupert
Bear with a truly bear-sized erection.
Neville was arraigned at the Old Bailey on a charge of “conspiracy
to produce a magazine with intent thereby to debauch and corrupt the
morals of young persons within the realm”. It carried a maximum sentence
of life imprisonment.
John Peel (Nigel Planer) and Richard Neville (Hugh Grant) in Geoffrey Robertson’s BBC drama The Trials of Oz, 1991
After a trial lasting six weeks and testimony to the public benefit of Oz from experts including the psychiatrist Hans Eysenck, the creative thinker Edward de Bono, the jurisprudence professor Ronald Dworkin and the comedian Marty Feldman,
the jury acquitted on the conspiracy charge. But the judge directed
them to bring back a verdict of guilty on an obscenity charge, whereupon
he ordered the defendants to be detained in prison for psychiatric
examination.
As
they were stark staring sane, and this was what was happening to
dissidents in Russia, there was an uproar in parliament, led by Tony Benn and Michael Foot.
Neville was jailed for 18 months by Judge Michael Argyle and ordered to
be deported (to Botany Bay, presumably) – a fate the Australian could
only avoid by marrying an Englishwoman. The young Anna Wintour
offered her hand, although the court of appeal made nuptials
unnecessary by quashing the convictions. Neville’s charisma survived his
haircut – in my BBC television drama The Trials of Oz (1991), he was played by Hugh Grant.
Neville was no street revolutionary. Violence shocked and actually
frightened him. The revolution he sought was in the mind and he was
always willing to change his, if the evidence demanded. (He discarded
his youthful belief that soft drugs were conducive to peace when he
researched the killings of Vietnamese civilians by GIs high on
cannabis.) He was a provocateur, an adventurer and a journalist.
Those who knew him will never forget his delight in new ideas, his
ability to enthuse his friends to think about future prospects and
perils of a technological and interconnected society, and his endless
curiosity about what lay beneath the emperor’s newest clothes.
Neville tired of London but not of life, which he rediscovered with
Julie Clarke. Their marriage was a joyous ceremony beside a waterfall at
Happy Daze, his family property in the Blue Mountains outside Sydney.
His books remain essential reading for those interested in decoding
the 60s, from Playpower (a mischievous sub-Marcusean manifesto) to
Hippie Hippie Shake, a slightly rueful, but very funny, look back in
languor. Those of us privileged to have played against power alongside
him will remember the warmest and most generous of friends, a man with a
deep moral vision and, when it came to the crunch, the courage of his
convictions. • Richard Clive Neville, editor, writer and broadcaster, born 15 December 1941; died 4 September 2016
No comments:
Post a Comment