Contemporary politics,local and international current affairs, science, music and extracts from the Queensland Newspaper "THE WORKER" documenting the proud history of the Labour Movement.
MAHATMA GANDHI ~ Truth never damages a cause that is just.
Tuesday, 28 February 2017
Forget Trump’s tweets and media bans. The real issue is his threat to the internet
Deregulation could allow the president to undermine freedom of speech in a way that was beyond even Nixon
Ajit Pai (left), Trump’s appointment as the new Federal Communications
Commission chairman, with Tom Wheeler, the Democrat he replaced.
Photograph: Kevin Lamarque/Reuters
In one of the most jaw-dropping press conferences of all time, this month President Trump declared war on the entire news media, except Fox News and Alex Jones of InfoWars. Last week he doubled down with his speech
at the Conservative Political Action Conference, on the same day that
the Guardian, New York Times, BBC and CNN were among news organisations barred from a press briefing.
All of this is occurring at a time of unprecedented financial
pressure on the news media. For newspapers and magazines, both
advertising and readership are shifting rapidly from print to the
internet. Print advertising and circulation revenues are
declining sharply.
Furthermore, as readership shifts to the internet, digital
advertising revenues are shifting even more sharply away from the news
publications themselves to the small number of technology companies that
send them traffic. Facebook and Google now capture the overwhelming majority of digital advertising revenues.
Richard Nixon’s resignation speech in 1974. ‘When the
Washington Post and New York Times faced off against the Nixon
administration, they were enormously profitable, secure companies.’
Photograph: PLP
When the Washington Post and New York Times, among others, faced off
against the Nixon administration over the secret bombing of Cambodia,
the Pentagon papers
and then Watergate, they were enormously profitable, secure companies.
So were Time, Newsweek, and other news magazines; and so, despite their
dependence on regulation by the Federal Communications Commission, were
the three television networks.
That world is gone. Newsrooms are being downsized, starting with
investigative journalism, the most expensive kind of reporting. The Washington Post has sold itself to Amazon. The Los Angeles Times and Chicago Tribune are basically bankrupt.
None of the major television networks or cable channels are independent
any more, and most of them are under increasing financial pressure.
Against
this backdrop, however alarming Trump’s attacks on the media are, they
are less significant than other actions that, paradoxically, have
received far less media coverage – but that present a very real threat
to journalism and freedom of speech in America.
Donald Trump lost no time installing Ajit Pai
as the new chairman of the FCC, which regulates broadcast and internet
media. Pai has stated that he opposes net neutrality, the principle
whereby service providers and regulators treat all data the same. Since
his appointment Pai declined to say whether he will enforce existing
neutrality rules, but if these rules are overturned then the small
number of companies that dominate US internet access will be permitted
to promote content of their choosing, placing other content and its
providers at a disadvantage. Pai has reversed a recent FCC decision
that would have opened the provision of cable set-top boxes to
competition. The move allows cable companies to retain control of not
only set-top boxes, but also the software and programming content
passing through them. This of course runs counter to Trump’s avowed
principle of helping the little guy, etc – but that is no longer a
surprise. Pai also blocked a programme designed to provide internet access to rural and low-income households.
There is potentially far more. The FCC holds sway over all
telecommunications. As the newspaper and magazine industries convert to
digital formats, they become dependent on services subject to FCC
regulation. Given Trump’s personality, track record and various
statements, it does not seem insane to worry that he might try to use
the FCC to exert political pressure on the news media. It has been tried
before, notably by Richard Nixon, when he was trying to persecute
enemies and suppress the scandals of Watergate.
But the relaxation of oversight with regard to concentration of the media industry – mirroring other sectors, including banking,
though receiving far less attention – is even more worrying. The FCC
and the justice department both oversee competition, or antitrust,
policy for telecommunications. And both have been asleep at the switch
for years. The internet-access industry has become a tight oligopoly,
which keeps the price and speed of US internet access far behind those of other industrial nations.
Even this isn’t the worst of it. The large internet providers are now
acquiring the media properties for which, increasingly, their services
are essential. Amazon has bought the Washington Post. Verizon is buying Yahoo and has already purchased AOL, the owner of the Huffington Post. AT&T is buying Time Warner,
which owns CNN and HBO among other channels. A large portion of the
news media will soon be owned by enormous companies with very strong
special interests of their own.
Antitrust policy was already in bad shape under Barack Obama; now
it’s going to get much worse. Trump singles out Fox News for praise at
the same time that the sale of its largest rival, Time Warner, is under antitrust review at the justice department. That would be the same justice department where Trump recently fired the acting attorney general
for refusing to enforce his orders, on the grounds that those orders
were illegal – a position subsequently upheld by the courts. It’s not
hard to imagine what might happen to anyone who gets it into their head
to stick up for market competition or media independence.
All is not lost, of course. Much of the news media is feisty in covering the Trump administration,
and independent voices remain plentiful. But kleptocracies and
dictatorships don’t usually appear overnight; they creep up on you
gradually. And this would definitely be one of those times to start
looking over your shoulder, early and often.
No comments:
Post a Comment