Media Release.
Today
(Thursday 1 August) is the day Queenslanders start paying more for
their vehicle and household insurance cover thanks to the Newman
Government.
Shadow
Treasurer Curtis Pitt said from today Queenslanders would face
increases in insurance duty on their motor vehicles and homes.
“The
increase will even apply to householders in disaster-prone areas who
have already seen their premiums rise dramatically,” Mr Pitt said.
“The
2013 State Budget delivered in June outlined increases in insurance
taxes that will generate an extra $990 million for the Newman Government
over four years."
“This was after the Treasurer previously said that there would be no tax increases in the Budget."
“This
increase is particular unfair because GST is already charged on
insurance, so the Newman Government is imposing a tax increase on top of
an existing tax which only compounds the cost
to householders."
“When he was on the Opposition benches the
Treasurer Tim Nicholls called insurance duty a
‘windfall on misery’. Now in Government he is using it as a windfall
for himself.”
The table below shows what the LNP’s insurance duty slog will mean for the cost of living.
Insurance Category
|
Percentage increase
|
Average dollar increase
|
Car Insurance
|
4%
|
$36
|
Home and Contents Insurance
|
1.5%
|
$25
|
Mortgage Insurance
|
4%
|
$14
|
The increase in duty for an average household with mortgage insurance and two cars is more than $110 per year.
Mr Pitt said in
disaster affected areas some increases would
range between $123 and $215 a year even though many residents were
already struggling with insurance costs.
“The
increase for people in disaster affected areas is even greater where
some premiums have increased by 1000 per cent over the last two years."
“Some
households in flood-affected areas are paying insurance premiums of
anywhere between $8,200 and $19,000 a year,” Mr Pitt said.
He said the
increases from 1 August followed an admission by the Under-Treasurer in
Parliamentary Estimates hearings that no assessment had been done on how
the duty increase would impact on people in disaster affected areas
including the uptake of insurance.
Extract from Estimates Committee Hearing:
Mr PITT:
Under Treasurer, with reference to page 57 of budget paper No. 4 where
sets out increases
to insurance duty—the Treasurer previously described it as a `windfall
on misery’; I think that was one of the things said in this particular
area—was any advice requested on potential impacts on the uptake of
insurance in disaster affected areas and, if not,
why not?
(Under-Treasurer) Ms Gluer:
I do not actually believe that did form part of the assessment when it
was done, and the main
reason for that, Mr Pitt, is that the actual increase in insurance duty
is such a small part of the actual premium and the actual premium
increase in the areas that I think you are referring to was very
significant compared to the stamp duty portion of that.
No comments:
Post a Comment