Extract from The Guardian
State governments and the education union say they
are disappointed after being encouraged by Malcolm Turnbull’s
‘positive comments’
The education minister, Simon Birmingham,
confirmed on Tuesday that the Gonski funding model is no longer on
the table. Photograph: Alan Porritt/AAP
Tuesday 29 December 2015 19.34 AEDT
The federal government has dashed hopes that
Malcolm
Turnbull would reverse the objections of his predecessor, Tony
Abbott, to the Gonski school funding model, confirming that funding
for the program is not guaranteed beyond 2017.
State governments and the education union had been
buoyed by comments Turnbull made shortly after taking over from
Abbott that indicated that Gonski may be given a lifeline.
The sharp funding increases slated for the last
two years of the reforms – 2017 and 2018 – were scrapped
in the 2014 budget, and not reinstated in the most recent budget
update.
The federal education minister, Simon Birmingham,
confirmed on Tuesday that the Gonski funding model was no longer on
the table.
“Nothing has changed in relation to the Turnbull
government’s policy on schools funding,” he said in a statement.
The teacher’s union was disappointed that Gonski
was no longer an option, saying that Turnbull’s “positive
comments” on the program had caused many in the sector to be
optimistic.
“I think it would be a shock to anyone waking up
this morning,” the federal president of the Australian Education
Union, Correna Haythorpe, told Guardian Australia. “People were
very hopeful that the last two years would be funded.”
Shortly after becoming prime minister, Turnbull
was asked if he would reconsider funding the fifth and sixth years of
the Gonski funding.
“This is all being considered by the government
in the context of a very tight budget,” he told the ABC in late
October.
On Tuesday he said the Coalition’s education
policy was up for review.
“The bottom line is that the funding after 2018
is still a matter for discussion between the federal government and
the states,” he said in Victoria. “Funding is important, but
there is a lot more to it, I think as we all know. The key element is
teacher quality and we are very focused on that.
“Simon Birmingham, the education minister, is in
discussion with his colleagues and the states, and we are certainly
committed to ensuring that working together with the states, our
common challenge has the outcome that all Australian kids get access
to a high quality education.”
States have expressed their disappointment.
“I understand the budget pressures they are
under but I strongly believe it is too early to make a decision in
relation to that funding,” the New South Wales premier, Mike Baird,
said.
“Yes, the funds might have to be found, but if
we prove over the next two or three years that those funds are
delivering better educational outcomes for our kids, particularly
some of our most disadvantaged kids, what sort of government would
not want to participate in that?”
Baird said NSW was committed to funding the full
term of the policy and wanted the federal government to consider
doing the same.
The acting Australian Capital Territory education
minister, Mick Gentleman, said the government must be clear on how it
was going to fund schools if it ditched the Gonski model, which
allocates money to schools based on the individual needs of
students.“They have to move quickly to end the current uncertainty
and begin negotiations with the states and territories and
non-government sectors,” he said.
Education policy will shape up to be a “key
election issue” in 2016, Haythorpe predicted.
Polling of just under 700 voters in Turnbull’s
eastern Sydney electorate of Wentworth found that eight out of 10
voters supported increased funding for public schools in line with
Gonski recommendations.
The ReachTel poll, conducted in October, found
that 73% of Liberal voters supported the proposition.
Birmingham insisted that the federal government
would stick with the needs-based policy championed in the Gonski
reforms.
“The Turnbull government remains committed to
engaging prior to 2018 in discussions with the states, territories
and non-government sector about post-2017 funding that is fair,
transparent, needs-based, affordable and looks beyond just a two year
horizon,” he said.
No comments:
Post a Comment