Contemporary politics,local and international current affairs, science, music and extracts from the Queensland Newspaper "THE WORKER" documenting the proud history of the Labour Movement.
MAHATMA GANDHI ~ Truth never damages a cause that is just.
Tuesday, 7 August 2018
Low inflation hasn't led to more spending. Only wage growth will do that
‘The only group where we seem to have taken advantage of the fall in
prices and spent more than normal was on clothing and footwear.’
Photograph: Dan Peled/AAP
The retail trade data
released last week was just the latest disappointment in the search for
positive signs of household spending. While the figures showed some
slightly better signs, overall they merely confirmed that households
have shut their wallets as the lack of real wage growth continues.
One of the things about underperforming sectors of the economy is how quickly previously weak figures are treated as good signs.
The latest retail trade figures released by the Bureau of Statistics
showed that in trend terms retail spending in June was 3.1% above where
it was 12 months earlier. This was the first time for a year that the
annual growth was above 3% and well above the nadir of 1.8% growth in
October last year.
So yes, good news. But come on, let’s not get too excited. Three per
cent spending growth is bloody awful on an historical basis:
One of the factors with retail trade data we need to consider is
inflation. While most economic data we look at in the GDP figures is in
real terms, retail trade figures are nominal – ie they count the actual
dollars spent.
This means that they are affected by the current low level of inflation.
And while the cost of some of the more essential items of household expenditure are rising above inflation levels, generally that is not the case with the things we buy in retail shops.
The closest to the 2.1% CPI rise is in the food categories – both the
general “food” group and the cafe, restaurants and take-away group.
Overall, however, the price of retail trade goods and services rose
just 0.2% in the past 12 months – mostly due to large falls in the cost
of items in the household goods group (-2.9%), the clothing and footwear
group (-2.3%) and the cost of goods in departments stores (-3%).
What this means is that a large proportion of the growth in retail
spending has been on food. This is not unusual given we spend about 40%
of monthly retail spending on food, but in the past 12 months food
spending accounted for 54% of the growth:
The only group where we seem to have taken advantage of the fall in
prices and spent more than normal was on clothing and footwear. All
other groups saw a smaller increase in spending than you would expect
given how much we normally spend on them each month.
So, to an extent, you can understand why the growth of retail trade
is so low. If the price of items was growing at 3%, then even if we all
just bought the same amount of goods as we did a year ago, the retail
trade would have grown by 3%. With the price of goods barely increasing
it means any growth in retail trade has to come from an increase in the
amount of things we buy, not from things costing more.
The good thing about the latest retail trade data is that it also
gives us the latest quarterly figures for volume of trade – ie growth
that takes into account inflation.
But these figures show that the low level of retail trade is not due
to just weak inflation, but also because households are not increasing
their spending anywhere near the level they used to.
In the past 12 months, the volume of retail trade grew by 2.5% – a level it has been stuck at for a year now:
The annual growth of 2.5% is also pretty much bang on the average
since the GFC hit in 2008, but it remains well below the 4.1% average
growth from 1984 to 2008.
And this does not bode well for household consumption boosting the GDP figures out next month.
While retail trade is not a perfect match for household consumption
it is a pretty good guide. The flatness of retail trade volume also
means that any lift from household consumption will need to come from
areas such as insurance, health, rent and utilities spending:
There is not likely to be any lift from the other major non-retail area of new car purchases.
The latest new car sales figures also out last week via the federal chamber of automotive industries (the ABS no longer calculate vehicle sales figures) showed that over the past 12 months new car sales fell 7.8%.
It is just more evidence that despite pretty solid employment growth
figures the lack of income growth remains a major factor for Australian
households.
We’re not really taking advantage of low inflation to spend more
because even with that low inflation our incomes are barely keeping pace
(and for many not) with rises in the cost of living. As such we’re spending more on essentials such as food, and holding off on making a major new purchase like a new car.
It highlights how, more than ever – both in political and economic
terms – the major issue is wages growth. Until our wages start growing
at a faster pace, we will remain stuck with economic growth much lower
than we were once used to.
No comments:
Post a Comment