Thursday, 29 February 2024

Yulia Navalnaya, widow of Alexei Navalny, tells European Parliament her husband's body was abused.

Extract from  ABC News

ABC News Homepage


Yulia Navalnaya, wife of late Russian opposition politician Alexei Navalny, said her late husband's body had been abused and she was not sure if his funeral on Friday would be a peaceful event.

Ms Navalnaya spoke to the European Parliament in Strasbourg, 12 days after her husband died suddenly in a Russian penal colony at the age of 47.

"The funeral will take place the day after tomorrow and I'm not sure yet whether it will be peaceful or whether police will arrest those who have come to say goodbye to my husband," she told MPs, as she received multiple standing ovations.

She urged European politicians and officials to investigate financial flows in the West linked to Russian President Vladimir Putin and his allies.

"Putin is the leader of an organised criminal gang. This includes poisoners and assassins but they're just puppets. The most important thing is the people close to Putin — his friends, associates and keepers of mafia money," she said.

"You and all of us must fight the criminal gang. And the political innovation here is to apply the methods of fighting organised crime, not political competition. Not statements of concern but the search for mafia associates in your countries, for discreet lawyers and financiers who are helping Putin and his friends to hide money."

Ms Navalnaya accused Mr Putin of having her husband killed, an allegation the Kremlin has angrily rejected.

"Putin killed my husband," she said.

"On his orders, Alexei was tortured for three years. He was starved in a tiny stone cell, cut off from the outside world and denied visits, phone calls and then even letters," she said.

"And then they killed him. Even after that they abused his body and abused his mother,"

Speaking in English, her voice sometimes faltering, she described Mr Putin as a "bloody monster" and told MPs it was not possible to negotiate with him.

She has promised to continue his work, urging Russians to share her rage against Mr Putin, and has met Western politicians, including US President Joe Biden last week.

Navalny's funeral to be held on Friday

A close-up photo of a man in a gingham shirt
Mr Navalny's spokeswoman Kira Yarmysh said the funeral will be held on Friday. (AP Photo: Alexander Zemilanichenko)

The funeral of Mr Navalny, who died earlier this month in a remote Arctic penal colony, will take place on Friday in Moscow after several locations declined to host the service, his spokesperson said.

Kira Yarmysh, his spokesperson, posted on X that a service for Mr Navalny would be held on Friday at 2pm (local time) in the Church of the Icon of the Mother of God in the Moscow district of Maryino where he used to live.

Mr Navalny would then be buried at the Borisovskoye cemetery, which is located on the other side of the Moskva River to the south, Ms Yarmysh said.

Such services, presided over by a priest and accompanied by choral singing, usually allow people to file past the open casket of the deceased to say their farewell.

The chosen Russian Orthodox church is an imposing five-domed white building in a built-up suburb of southeastern Moscow.

It was not immediately clear how the authorities would ensure crowd control.

But judging from previous gatherings of Navalny supporters — whom the authorities have designated as US-backed extremists — a heavy police presence is likely and the authorities will break up anything they deem to resemble a political demonstration under protest laws.

Struggles to get funeral venues

Ms Yarmysh spoke of the difficulties his team encountered in trying to find a site for a "farewell event" for Mr Navalny.

Writing on X, she said most venues reported they were fully booked, with some "refusing when we mention the surname 'Navalny'," and one disclosing that "funeral agencies were forbidden to work with us."

Ivan Zhdanov, the director of Mr Navalny's Anti-Corruption Foundation, said the funeral was initially planned for Thursday – the day of Mr Putin's annual address to Russia's Federal Assembly – but no venue would agree to hold it then.

"The real reason is clear. The Kremlin understands that nobody will need Putin and his message on the day we say farewell to Alexei," Mr Zhdanov wrote on Telegram.

YouTube Russia jails human rights advocate ahead of Navalny widow address | The World

Ms Navalnaya said she was not sure whether the funeral service would be peaceful or whether the police would make arrests.

The Kremlin has denied state involvement in his death and has said it is unaware of any agreement to free Mr Navalny prior to his death.

Mr Navalny's death certificate, according to supporters, said he died of natural causes.

His mother last week accused the authorities of trying to blackmail her into holding a private funeral for her son by initially withholding his body, an assertion the Kremlin called absurd.

AP/Reuters

Wednesday, 28 February 2024

Twitter is becoming a 'ghost town' of bots as AI-generated spam content floods the internet.

Extract from ABC News

ABC News Homepage


One morning in January this year, marine scientist Terry Hughes opened X (formerly Twitter) and searched for tweets about the Great Barrier Reef.

"I keep an eye on what's being tweeted about the reef every day," Professor Hughes, a leading coral researcher at James Cook University, said.

What he found that day surprised and confused him; hundreds of bot accounts tweeting the same strange message with slightly different wording.

"Wow, I had no idea that agricultural runoff could have such a devastating impact on the Great Barrier Reef," one account, which otherwise spruiked cryptocurrencies, tweeted.

Another crypto bot wrote: "Wow, it's disheartening to hear about the water pollution challenges Australia faces."

And so on. Hundreds of crypto accounts tweeting about agricultural runoff.

A month later, it happened again. This time, bots were tweeting about "marine debris" threatening the Great Barrier Reef.

What was going on?

When Professor Hughes tweeted what he'd found, some saw a disinformation conspiracy, an attempt to deflect attention from climate change.

The likely answer, however, is more mundane, but also more far-reaching in its implications.

More than a year since Elon Musk bought X with promises to get rid of the bots, the problem is worse than ever, experts say.

And this is one example of a broader problem affecting online spaces.

The internet is filling up with "zombie content" designed to game algorithms and scam humans.

It's becoming a place where bots talk to bots, and search engines crawl a lonely expanse of pages written by artificial intelligence (AI).

Junk websites clog up Google search results. Amazon is awash with nonsense e-books. YouTube has a spam problem.

And this is just a trickle in advance of what's been called the "great AI flood".

Bots liking bots, talking to other bots

But first, let's get back to those reef-tweetin' bots.

Timothy Graham, an expert on X bot networks at the Queensland University of Technology, ran the tweets through a series of bot and AI detectors.

Dr Graham found 100 per cent of the text was AI-generated.

"Overall, it appears to be a crypto bot network using AI to generate its content," he said.

"I suspect that at this stage it's just trying to recruit followers and write content that will age the fake accounts long enough to sell them or use them for another purpose."

That is, the bots probably weren't being directed to tweet about the reef in order to sway public opinion.

Dr Graham suspects these particular bots probably have no human oversight, but are carrying out automated routines intended to out-fox the bot-detection algorithms.

Searching for meaning in their babble was often pointless, he said.

"[Professor Hughes] is trying to interpret it and is quite right to try and make sense of it, but it just chews up attention, and the more engagement they get, the more they are rewarded.

A middle-aged man in a suit pushes his fingertips together onstage in front of a black and white backdrop.
Twitter owner Elon Musk promised to "defeat the spam bots or die trying".(Reuters: Gonzalo Fuentes)

The cacophony of bot-talk degrades the quality of online conversations. They interrupt the humans and waste their time.

"Here's someone who is the foremost research scientist in this space, spending their time trying to work out the modus operandi of these accounts."

In this case, the bots were replying to the tweet of another bot, which, in turn, replied to the tweets of other bots, and so on.

One fake bot account was stacked on top of the other, Dr Graham said.

"It's AI bots all the way down."

How bad is X's bot problem?

In January, a ChatGPT glitch appeared to shine a light on X's bot problem.

For a brief time, some X accounts posted ChatGPT's generic response to requests that it deems outside of its content policy, exposing them as bots that use ChatGPT to generate content.

Users posted videos showing scrolling feeds with numerous accounts stating "I'm sorry, but I cannot provide a response to your request as it goes against OpenAl's content policy."

"Twitter is a ghost town," one user wrote.

A video posted on Threads by @parkermolloy
A video posted on Threads by @parkermolloy showing bot accounts on Twitter.(Supplied: Threads / @parkermolloy)

But the true scale of X's bot problem is difficult for outsiders to estimate.

Shortly after Mr Musk gained control of X while complaining about bots, X shut down free access to the programming interface that allowed researchers to study this problem.

That left researchers with two options: pay X for access to its data or find another way to peek inside.

Towards the end of last year, Dr Graham and his colleagues at QUT paid X $7,800 from a grant fund to analyse 1 million tweets surrounding the first Republican primary debate. 

They found the bot problem was worse than ever, Dr Graham said at the time.

Later studies support this conclusion. Over three days in February, cybersecurity firm CHEQ tracked the proportion of bot traffic from X to its clients' websites.

It found three-quarters of traffic from X was fake, compared to less than 3 per cent of traffic from each of TikTok, Facebook and Instagram.

"Terry Hughes' experience is an example of what's going on on the platform," Dr Graham said.

"One in 10 likes are from a porn bot, anecdotally."

The rise of a bot-making industry

So what's the point of all these bots? What are they doing?

Crypto bots drive up demand for certain coins, porn bots get users to pay for porn websites, disinformation bots peddle fake news, astroturfing bots give the impression of public support, and so on.

Some bots exist purely to increase the follower counts and engagement statistics of paying customers.

A sign of the scale of X's bot problem is the thriving industry in bot-making.

Bot makers from around the world advertise their services on freelancer websites.

Awais Yousaf, a computer scientist in Pakistan, sells "ChatGPT Twitter bots" for $30 to $500, depending on their complexity.

In an interview with the ABC, the 27-year-old from Gujranwala said he could make a "fully fledged" bot that could "like comments on your behalf, make comments, reply to DMs, or even make engaging content according to your specification".

Mr Yousaf's career tracks the rise of the bot-making economy and successive cycles of internet hype.

Having graduated from university five years ago, he joined Pakistan's growing community of IT freelancers from "very poor backgrounds".

Bot makers advertising services on a freelancer site
Bot makers advertising services on a freelancer site.(Supplied: Fiverr)

Many of the first customers wanted bots to promote cryptocurrencies, which were booming in popularity at the time.

"Then came the NFT thing," he said. 

A few years ago he heard about OpenAI's GPT3 language model and took a three-month break to learn about AI.

"Now, almost 90 per cent of the bots I do currently are related to AI in one way or another.

"It can be as simple as people posting AI posts regarding fitness, regarding motivational ideas, or even cryptocurrency predictions."

In five years he's made 120 Twitter bots.

Asked about Mr Musk's promise to "defeat the spam bots," Mr Yousaf smiled.

"It's hard to remove Twitter bots from Twitter because Twitter is mostly bot."

AI-generated spam sites may overwhelm search engines

X's bot problem may be worse than other major platforms, but it's not alone.

A growing "deluge" of AI content is flooding platforms that were "never designed for a world where machines can talk with people convincingly", Dr Graham said.

"It's like you're running a farm and had never heard of a wolf before and then suddenly you have new predators on the scene.

"The platforms have no infrastructure in place. The gates are open."

The past few months have seen several examples of this.

Companies are using AI to rewrite other media outlet's stories, including the ABC's, to then publish them on the company's competing news websites.

A company called Byword claims it stole 3.6 million in "total traffic" from a competitor by copying their site and rewriting 1,800 articles using AI.

"Obituary pirates" are using AI to create YouTube videos of people summarising the obituaries of strangers, sometimes fabricating details about their deaths, in order to capture search traffic.

Authors are reporting what appear to be AI-generated imitations and summaries of their books on Amazon.

Google's search results are getting worse due to spam sites, according to a recent pre-print study by German researchers.

The researchers studies search results for thousands of product-review terms across Google, Bing and DuckDuckGo over the course of a year.

They found that higher-ranked pages tended to have lower text quality but were better designed to game the search ranking algorithm.

"Search engines seem to lose the cat-and-mouse game that is SEO spam," they wrote in the study.

Co-author Matti Wiegman from Bauhaus University, Weimar said this rankings war was likely to get much worse with the advent of AI-generated spam.

"What was previously low-quality content is now very difficult to distinguish from high-quality content," he said.

"As a result, it might become difficult to distinguish between authentic and trustworthy content that is useful and content that is not."

He added that the long-term effects of AI-generated content on search engines was difficult to judge.

AI-generated content could make search more useful, he said.

"One possible direction is that generated content will become better than the low-quality human-made content that dominates some genres in web search, in which case the search utility will increase."

Or the opposite will happen. AI-generated content will overwhelm "vulnerable spaces" such as search engines and "broadcasting-style" social media platforms like X.

In their place, people may turn to "walled gardens" and specialised forums with smaller numbers of human-only members.

Platforms prepare for coming flood

In response to this emerging problem, platforms are trialling different strategies.

Meta recently announced it was building tools to detect and label AI-generated images posted on its Facebook, Instagram and Threads services.

Amazon has limited authors to uploading a maximum of three books to its store each day, although authors say that hasn't solved the problem.

X is trialling a "Not a Bot" program in some countries where it charges new users $1 per year for basic features.

This program operates alongside X's verification system, where users pay $8 per month to have their identity checked and receive a blue tick.

But it appears the bot-makers have found a way around this.

All the reef-tweeting crypto bots Professor Hughes found were verified accounts.

"It's clutter on the platform that's not necessary. You'd wish they'd clean it up," the coral scientist said.

"It wastes everyone's time."

Maryam and Abdullah got married in the Israel-Gaza war and were killed in an air strike two days later.

Extract from ABC News 

ABC News Homepage


Maryam Sayed Deeb and Abdullah Abu Nahl had been planning their wedding for a year before their lives in Gaza were torn apart by war.

With millions forced to flee their homes and find safe areas, the couple initially put their nuptials on hold to focus on survival.

WARNING: Some readers might find the details and images in this story distressing.

But as the months dragged on with no end in sight to the ongoing Israeli bombings, the two decided to marry.

There are few supplies left in Gaza because of a siege imposed by Israel, which controls the entry of nearly all goods into the enclave, so the couple could not hold formal celebrations.

Instead they exchanged vows surrounded by the people they loved most.

Maryam's father, Abed al Salam Sayed Deeb, says it provided the family with a small sliver of hope and joy.

"They were both deeply in love with each other. She loved him, he loved her," Abed says.

"They decided to get married during the war because you can see the situation, there is nothing to be happy about. Today, we are alive, we might die tomorrow.

"So I thought, let me give my daughter to her husband. What was the point of postponing? We wanted them to be happy."

A man puts his arms around a smiling woman dressed in a pink hijab.
Maryam and Abdullah had been planning their wedding when they put it on hold because of war.(Supplied)

The pair decided to marry on February 15, the day after Valentine's Day, in a small ceremony.

"We congratulated them and we accompanied them to the chalet that was lent [to them] by their friends," Abed says.

"They settled in the chalet. Then, we left back home."

But just two days after becoming husband and wife, Maryam and Abdullah were killed in an Israeli air strike on Khirbet al Adas, near the southern Gaza city of Rafah.

The air strike that tore a family apart

Nearly 30,000 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza, according to the enclave's Ministry of Health, since the start of the war.

About 1,200 people were killed inside Israel after a Hamas-led attack on the country on October 7.

Maryam and her husband were staying in their friend's chalet when it was hit and destroyed by an Israeli air strike.

Data collated by the non-governmental and non-profit Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project shows there were eight air strikes on and around Rafah on February 17.

One of those attacks included an Israeli warplane hitting agricultural land hosting displaced people in Khirbet al Adas, which killed seven Palestinians, including a woman and three children.

Maryam's father had exchanged words with his daughter only an hour before she died, after checking in to see how she was doing.

A man wearing a dark jacket searches the rubble of a destroyed building.
Abed says his daughter loved her husband and he saw no reason in delaying their wedding.(ABC News)

"I asked her whether she was happy. She replied 'yes, thanks to God,'" he says.

"She asked me when I will visit, to which I answered 'tomorrow.'"

But Maryam did not see her father again. Palestinian authorities say several other civilians were also killed in the explosion, though recovering their bodies has been difficult.

The force of the blast was so intense that only debris and small bones remain.

Piles of dirt and debris surround a big hole in the ground.
The site of a chalet that was hit and destroyed by an Israeli air strike.(ABC News)

"An hour after the call, I received the news about the chalet being bombed and all the people inside are dead," Abed says.

"I rushed to the chalet, and I could not find my daughter, nor her husband. That's all I got, body parts. We don't know who's who."

Since his daughter's death, Abed has returned to the area around the bomb site, looking for remnants of his daughter's body to lay to rest.

The couple's remains are yet to be found, which means Maryam and Abdullah can't be buried.

A man looks down while searching a destroyed car on a sunny day.
Abed continues to search the site where his daughter was killed for her remains.(ABC News)

"My daughter has died as a martyr, that's a given. Yet, I need to see her dead corpse and hold her, kiss her goodbye," he says.

As he speaks, he picks a piece of debris up off the ground. He turns it over in his hand to reveal it is a piece of vertebrae from a spine.

"That's the biggest part of their bodies found so far," Abed says.

He put it in a bucket and takes it to an area a short distance away from the bomb site.

He then digs a small hole, and buries the bone.

"Why is this happening to us? Why are we all soul martyrs?" he says.

"We don't want war. We want nothing. We just want to live a life in dignity and be still alive."

But even in death, Abed can't find dignity for his daughter and his family doesn't understand why the couple were killed.

'She did not have time to be happy'

Maryam was the eldest of 10 children, and the family had fled to Rafah to escape fighting elsewhere in Gaza.

Her mother Ghalia Jomaa Mahmoud Deeb breaks down in tears as she clutches the only possessions she can find of her daughter.

A woman wearing a dark blue hijab openly cries in a crowded hospital corridor.
Ghalia went searching for anything to remind her of her daughter and only found her phone and identification papers.(ABC News)

All that is left of Maryam is a broken phone and her identification papers.

"She did not have time to be happy. She was a bride for two days and then she died," she says.

Ghalia is now haunted by what ifs about the future her daughter might have had.

"The groom and bride what did they do? They did nothing wrong," she says.

"My daughter was an A-level student at university, and she had learned the Koran by heart.

"So many innocent civilians died. We cannot stand it anymore."

Before she was married, Maryam handed her sister, Aida Salam Deep Deip, two red roses, plucked from her simple wedding bouquet.

A close up of a girl wearing a black hijab and clutching two red roses to her chest.
Aida continues to tend to the two roses gifted by her sister before she died.(ABC News)

"That's the last gift my sister bought me," Aida says.

"When she left, I hugged her [and] she was happy. She was so happy to get married."

Despite having little drinkable water, Aida changes the water of the roses every day, hoping to keep them alive as long as possible.

"Each time I look at the flowers, I remember her."

A close up of a woman hiding her face from the sun on a beach.
Maryam was the eldest of 10 children in her family and had big dreams for the future.(Supplied)

Tuesday, 27 February 2024

Palestinian Prime Minister Mohammad Shtayyeh submits government's resignation.

Extract from ABC News 

ABC News Homepage


Palestinian Prime Minister Mohammed Shtayyeh says his government is resigning, in a move that could open the door to US-backed reforms in the Palestinian Authority.

President Mahmoud Abbas must still decide whether he accepts Mr Shtayyeh and his government's resignation, tendered on Monday.

But the move signals a willingness by the Western-backed Palestinian leadership to accept a shake-up that might usher in reforms seen as necessary to revitalise the Palestinian Authority.

The US wants a reformed Palestinian Authority to govern Gaza once the war is over. But many obstacles remain to making that vision a reality.

"The next stage and its challenges require new governmental and political arrangements that take into account the new reality in the Gaza Strip," Mr Shtayyeh said at a cabinet meeting.

Mr Abbas is expected to choose Mohammad Mustafa, chairman of the Palestine Investment Fund, as the next prime minister.

AP