Friday, 24 January 2014

Indonesian foreign minister Marty Natalegawa says Australia's asylum seeker turn-back policy 'unhelpful'

Extract from ABC News website:

Updated 5 minutes ago

Indonesia has fired back at Tony Abbott, saying it is "unhelpful" to bilateral relations for the Prime Minister to keep pursuing a policy of turning back asylum seeker boats.
Australia has admitted entering Indonesian waters without permission while trying to stop asylum seeker boats, and Mr Abbott said this week that his Government is committed to continuing the policy.
Indonesian foreign minister Marty Natalegawa said his country's security minister has made it clear that naval patrols have been beefed up in response.
"There was an indication that we will strengthen our border protection," he said from Switzerland, where the World Economic Forum and Geneva II talks on Syria are being held.
"I think that is a matter of public information that we have taken that decision."
But Dr Natalegawa played down reports that changes to Indonesia's radar arrangements, reported in local and Australian media, indicated the country was going on a war footing.
"Like we have said all along, we find it quite unhelpful to have this policy," Dr Natalegawa said.
"I have said in the past, this can be a slippery slope.

"That's why we feel that it would be best if we all take stock of where we are just now and ensure that things don't get out of hand."

Indonesia sends warships to patrol southern border

Sukhoi Su-27/30 Flankers are also ready to fly to the border if an Australian ship is detected in Indonesian waters
Indonesian warships, including torpedo and missile craft, have been moved to its border with Australia following Australia's admission last week that some of its vessels had inadvertently entered Indonesian waters.
The Indonesian navy’s chief spokesman, Commodore Untung Suropati, has confirmed a number of warships had moved towards the Australian border including frigates, fast torpedo craft (KCT), fast missile craft (KCR), corvettes and maritime patrol aircraft, the Jakarta Post reported.
“All the ships are on the move, patrolling the waters,” he said without specifying how many ships had been deployed.
Air force radar was also being used to patrol the border for Australian boats and Air Commodore Hadi Tjajanto said Australia was “reachable” from the Makassar base.
Australia apologised unreservedly last week after it was revealed there had been several naval incursions into Indonesian waters under its border protection plan designed to combat people-smuggling Operation Sovereign Borders.
The Indonesian president's foreign affairs spokesman, Teuku Faizasyah, said: “A violation of our national territory for any reason cannot be tolerated.”
“If Prime Minister Abbott asks President Yudhoyono and the Indonesian people to understand Australia’s seriousness with regards to its sovereignty, in the same vein, Indonesia also asks Australia to understand our firm commitment to our vital interests.”
Indonesia has 16 Sukhoi Su-27/30 Flankers ready to fly to the border if an Australian ship is detected in Indonesian waters. It is estimated the aircraft would take about an hour to make the trip.
Indonesia is also beefing up its defence forces, with one MP naming Australia as the country's greatest threat.
A restructure of Indonesia’s forces aims to deploy troops faster and to acquire long-range weapons.
“The plan will integrate the regional resources of the army, the navy and the air force into multi-service groups that will be positioned in certain defence flashpoints integral to preserving the country’s territorial integrity and sovereignty,” the Jakarta Post said.
Susaningtyas Handayani Kertopati, a member of the Indonesian House of Representatives defence, intelligence and foreign affairs committee, said an outward approach was being emphasised.
“The greatest threat will obviously be from Australia,” she said.
Her comments came as an anonymous official said a clash with Australia was “imminent” now the Indonesian navy was on the border.
The mobilisation of the Indonesian navy comes as asylum seekers say they suffered burns to their hands in an Australian towback operation to Indonesia.
The Australian navy, the prime minister, Tony Abbott, the immigration minister, Scott Morrison, and the foreign affairs minister, Julie Bishop, have rejected the allegations and Bishop said Australia would co-operate with the Indonesian police investigation.

Thursday, 23 January 2014

Bill shorten Leader of the Opposition, SUBJECT/S: Griffith by-election; Alcohol-fuelled violence; Abbott Government’s cuts to payments


E&OE TRANSCRIPT
4BC BRISBANE MORNINGS WITH PATRICK CONDREN
INTERVIEW

TUESDAY, 21 JANUARY 2014

 
PATRICK CONDREN: The Griffith by-election will be held on February the 8Th.  Bill Shorten, the Federal Opposition leader and ALP leader is in town, he’s allegedly helping the local candidate to campaign in that electorate. Bill, good morning, thanks for your time this morning.

BILL SHORTEN, LEADER OF THE OPPOSITION: Good morning, and congratulations on the new show, I hope it’s a success this year.

CONDREN: You’re very kind. Leave your money on the fridge as you go, all donations gratefully accepted. Can you win Griffith?

SHORTEN: Yes. Our candidate’s Terri Butler, she’s a working mum, a professional lawyer with a distinguished record. It’s a close election though, and for us the issues will be making sure that in Griffith people have a candidate who will stand up to the Abbott-style cuts to the healthcare system such as we’ve seen done by Campbell Newman to Queensland’s healthcare system.

CONDREN: But it’s a bit rich to claim the underdog status, when history shows us that incumbent governments never win by-elections?

SHORTEN: Well, I never take any group of voters for granted. That’s why I think it’s close. This election is about the future, it’s about how do we have a good quality healthcare system, how do we make sure that a local community gets strong representation which is not a rubber stamp for Tony Abbott.

CONDREN: Why is it important – I mean, obviously there is a degree of need for you to win this election. But why is it so important that you win this election, is it because it was Kevin Rudd’s old seat?

SHORTEN: Well, I think it’s important that the voters in Griffith have a clear choice, that they have someone who will stand up for them. Now the families in Griffith, there’s 47,000 households. These are people who in many cases get up and go to work every day, lot of double income families, mum and dad are both working, they’re trying to raise their kids the best way they can, they want to make sure they have a quality healthcare system, they want good schools. They also want to make sure there’s good meaningful jobs in the community, so it’s important to have representatives who are in touch with what goes on in the mainstream of people’s lives.

CONDREN: Will it come down to preferences?

SHORTEN: It could do, yes. I would expect that is a complete possibility.

CONDREN: So the Greens are preferencing, you know, Mr Ackroyd, who is a Kevin Rudd lookalike, I suppose.

SHORTEN: Ah, yeah. You know, by-elections bring out the weird and the wonderful. Our candidate Terri Butler is trying to get people’s first vote. Sure, there’ll be plenty of individual parties running, and that’s people’s democratic right. But Terri Butler, our candidate, is running to win. It’s the first time she’s run for politics but as I said, she has a distinguished career in the law standing up for people and she’s got two kids just below school age, so she understands – her and her working husband – that the real world is tough. You’ve got to make sure you can pay the bills, that you’ve got good healthcare and you’ve got good hospitals.

CONDREN: One issue that has been running red hot with us, certainly yesterday, and more broadly around the south-east in recent weeks is alcohol-fuelled violence. I know you called for Danny Green’s ‘One Punch’ ad to be taxpayer funded. What else can be done within, or from a political perspective to tackle this problem?

SHORTEN: Well first of all, you’ve got to recognise it’s a real issue. And I’m a dad, I’ve got a young boy who’s, you know, early teens. I worry dreadfully in 5 or 6 years if they’re going out that they too could be ambushed by a coward. So I think that part of the issue is indeed the availability of you know, late night, people being able to go and get a drink anywhere at any time.

CONDREN: Well Campbell Newman, obviously the LNP Premier here in Queensland, has rejected calls from the legal fraternity to cut back on the opening times or the closing times by 2 hours.

SHORTEN: That may be part of the answer. I also think though that we’ve got to make it clear that if you do this, you will pay a penalty. So I actually think some of the people who do this, and I’ve got friends who run pubs and have been around handling hoons and louts for a very long time, and I’ve said to these publicans – and people who run pubs, they want to make sure their customers are safe and that they run responsible venues, they don’t like this violence – I’ve said what do you think is the makeup of these people? And they’ve said to me that someone will do a king hit, someone who thinks that they’re some sort of street fighter martial arts star and they want to demonstrate on victims, you can’t deter them by just appealing to their better nature, you do need strong laws deterring them.

CONDREN: Ok. Mervin’s rung in 13 13 32 if you’d like to join the conversation. Good morning Mervin.

MERVIN [CALLER]: Good morning Pat, good morning Mr Shorten. Thanks for having me on this morning. I live in the Griffith electorate and have voted for Kevin and the other team a few different times. I was listening to your opening comments Bill where you said that Terri Butler, who I believe is a fine candidate, but you said that she’d be able to stand up to and basically win against Tony Abbott’s health cuts or anything else that’s bad for us. But to be honest, she can’t do that, can she? How can she do that from opposition?

SHORTEN: Oh, never underestimate people power. I’ll give you an example: before the election, Christopher Pyne and Tony Abbott said that they would be a unity ticket with Labor so that you’d see good funding for our schools. Then after the election Christopher Pyne said ‘no, actually that was then, this is now, bad luck, all bets are off’. The public outcry forced them back. So yeah, I do believe that strong representatives can create such a fuss that bad ideas and broken promises don’t happen. Yeah, I believe in the power of people to say no, stand up.

CONDREN: Mervin, thank you for your call. Can I put you a couple of questions, Mr Shorten, just on federal issues. Do you support any changes to welfare rules as flagged by Kevin Andrews?

SHORTEN: To be fair to the Government, the budget’s a challenge. We’ve got an economy in transition, and we’ve got concerns about the prospect of more unemployment, so it’s not easy. But what I don’t support is this discussion that age pensioners should be the answer to solving the problem of the Abbott Government. You know, you can’t stop growing old, it’s the best outcome, there’s no doubt. The age pension is not a ticket in TattsLotto, it’s not a Rolls Royce. It’s a modest fortnightly payment. Today the Abbott Government’s floated well, you know everything’s on the table, and maybe we shouldn’t increase the age pension by a regular amount that it has been in the past. So yeah, do I think that there’s a challenge in our economy to make sure that we can prepare it for the future? Yes. But I don’t think that people on the age pension should be the people that have to pay the price for the Abbott Government trying to work out how to run Australia.

CONDREN: Should job seekers be forced to take work even if it’s more than 90 minutes drive away?

SHORTEN: That’s hard, it depends on the personal circumstances of people. In my experience –

CONDREN: They might not earn enough to pay for the petrol to get to the 90 minutes away.

SHORTEN: Well, when I used to represent fruit pickers up in the bush, some of them would drive an hour each way but at a certain point it becomes uneconomical. You’re paying more to get to and from work than you are in the actual job. The other thing is some people say, ‘oh well, the unemployed should just get up and move to the other side of Australia’. You know, that’s a nice theory but it’s not as easy as it sounds. So do I think that we need to encourage unemployed people to work? Yes we do. But what I also know is that if there was a simple solution then someone would have already done it. Life’s more complex, so you’ve got to work out how do we ensure people get good education because then they can find their own jobs and they’ve got the right skills. How do we make sure that older people don’t get discriminated against? A group in the population who no one ever really talks about, people who might be 55 or 60, older people, men and women. Somehow we’ve got a bit of a bias, maybe its unconscious in our country that if you’ve got grey hair and you’re out of work, somehow then your experience and skills are worth less than some youngster just because they were born three decades after you.

CONDREN: But that’s the reality of working life these days. That is not a complaint that has gone away.

SHORTEN: Yeah but Australia can’t afford to waste the talent of older Australians.

CONDREN: Well I agree, but the reality is employers tend to be biased against them.

SHORTEN: Well our challenge then is to encourage employers to relook at older Australians. So, when we talk about – this discussion has come out of the question about unemployment and what can we do? The first thing we do is we don’t give up on Aussie jobs. So just giving up on the car industry and saying ‘oh, it costs too much’, well there’s tens of thousands of people who once that happens we’ll never see again. And what we need to do is stand up for Aussie jobs, and start promoting the benefits of older Australians.

CONDREN: One quick question finally, will you lead Labor to the next election?

SHORTEN: Yes.

CONDREN: Fair enough. Unequivocal?

SHORTEN: Yes, and that’s proof that I can give a quick answer.

CONDREN: Well I’m pleased, you don’t come across that often in modern politics. Bill Shorten, thanks for your time this morning. Federal Opposition leader Bill Shorten in the studio.


ENDS

Bill Shorten Leader of the Opposition, SUBJECT/S: Griffith by-election; Abbott Government’s cuts to payments; Tony Abbott’s Commission of Cuts; Jobs; Tony Abbott’s attack on Medicare.


E&OE TRANSCRIPT
DOORSTOP

TUESDAY, 21 JANUARY 2014
BRISBANE

 
BILL SHORTEN, LEADER OF THE OPPOSITION: It’s great to be here at the Hawthorne Ferry Terminal with Labor’s candidate for Griffith, Terri Butler. We’re getting a great reception this morning, but one of the issues that’s being raised with us by people is they’re saying the Abbott Government is not the government that people were told they would be before the election by the Abbott Opposition. People don’t like the broken promises. In particular there’s concern that following Campbell Newman’s cuts to the health system, that Tony Abbott will just trash Medicare and we will see a greater burden on people going to the doctor.

But in particular this morning, concerns are being expressed about Abbott Government Minister Kevin Andrews raising the prospect that people on the Age Pension will see that the rate of increase of the Age Pension will be damaged, that people on the Age Pension are going to suffer, effectively, real cuts in terms of their pension. People are very concerned because I think all Australians understand that people on the Age Pension have paid taxes their whole life, the Age Pension is a modest payment to help people in their elder years. If they’re on the Age Pension, no amount of Abbott Government wishing can make you younger, people rely on the Age Pension.

Our concern is that the Abbott Government – breaking promises in terms of health, putting everything on the table with their Commission of Audit – is now going to slug age pensioners and diminish the value of the Age Pension in coming years. Age pensioners should be off limits to the Abbott Government’s Commission of Cuts. Happy to take any questions, but before that I might ask Terri to give some of her feedback on this morning’s campaign.

TERRI BUTLER, LABOR CANDIDATE FOR GRIFFITH: We’ve met lots of people from the local area, from Hawthorne, from Bulimba, from Morningside where I live. It’s been a really good morning talking to people about the by-election and speaking to them about the need to have a member in this electorate who will be a strong voice, who won’t be a rubber stamp, who won’t describe Campbell Newman’s attacks on healthcare as ‘just being a few job losses’, but someone who will speak out against those healthcare cuts. It’s been a really positive morning, we’re getting a great reception and it’s been fantastic to have Bill here again. Thanks very much, I really appreciate your support.

SHORTEN: Are there any questions?

JOURNALIST: Mr Shorten, is the welfare system as it stands unsustainable?

SHORTEN: What is unsustainable is targeting fixed-income age pensioners, and for the Abbott Government to say that the only idea the Abbott Government has got about the future of this nation is about slugging age pensioners. Age pensioners receive a modest amount of payment, they’re not bludgers, they’re not rorting the system. Age pensioners deserve the support of the Abbott Government, they do not deserve to be on the chopping block in this year’s Budget, and I think the Abbott Government needs to rule out attacking age pensioners. The amount of money that an age pensioner receives is modest, and so it defies belief that the Abbott Government thinks that somehow the path to Australia’s salvation is attacking literally hundreds of thousands of age pensioners. It’s not on Tony Abbott, keep your hands off the Age Pension.

JOURNALIST: So who should be on the chopping block, Newstart?

SHORTEN: Tony Abbott spent a lot of time in Opposition being negative and now they’ve come into government, and clearly they don’t have an idea what to do. We’ve seen their broken promises on education. Before the election they said there’d be a unity ticket, and then after the election they cynically said that they would cut funding to schools over the next six years. Now we’ve seen them float the proposition of extra taxes on people going to the doctor. But this morning’s latest thought bubble from an Abbott Government Minister, from an Abbott Government who doesn’t have an idea in January of 2014 what to do in May of 2014. We will listen carefully to whatever the Abbott Government has to say, but what we won’t do is be party in mugging aged pensioners just to suit Tony Abbott’s inability to run his Budget.

JOURNALIST: Can you see any room for change in the welfare system overall, outside of the Age Pension?

SHORTEN: Let’s be clear, before we can get on to what the Abbott Government should be doing, we want them to be clear about what they’re not going to do. Age pensioners in January of 2014 should not be worried until the Budget about what’s going to happen. If the Abbott Government before the election said they were going to slow the rate of increase to the Age Pension, they should have told us. They should have told people, then people could have voted on whether or not they thought it was a good or bad idea. But this sort of sneaky, cynical, promise-breaking Abbott Government tactic won’t wash, and the Labor Opposition will not be party to mugging old-age pensioners and decreasing the amount by which the Age Pension goes up.

The Age Pension is modest, and when the Abbott Government can live on the Age Pension, perhaps then they can start floating ideas about restricting the growth of the Age Pension. Age pensioners spend their whole life working and paying taxes. The Age Pension is not a reward for growing old, it’s not a holiday in the sun, and no one should be talking on either side of politics, saying that the only answer we’ve got for Australia’s future is that somehow the age pensioners have got to pay for Tony Abbott’s broken promises. I’ll tell you where they can start, get rid of the multi-millionaires’ welfare, get rid of this gold-plated parental leave scheme which will benefit some people and receive windfall gains which they don’t need. If they want to tackle the real problems, don’t start with people at the bottom of the heap, don’t start with people who haven’t got a voice, don’t pick on the people who can’t fight back. They should drop any discussion about hitting the Age Pension.

JOURNALIST: So is Abbott targeting the poor to fund his spending?

SHORTEN: The Abbott Government doesn’t have much idea. I mean, if you want a slogan, go to the Abbott Government. That’s what they’re good at. But if you want to have a government which looks after all Australians, well then they’re at the back of the queue. We’ve got the secrecy on the boats, you’ve got the mess in education, you’ve got the inability to stand up for Australian jobs. You know, wave goodbye to any Australian icon under the Abbott Government, SPC, Qantas, Alcoa, Holden. Now you’ve got the medical attacks, the GP taxes. And now they’re floating restricting the rate of growth of the Age Pension. I don’t know what these guys are drinking in the Cabinet room, but they need to get off the Kool-Aid which says slug the poor to pay for the Abbott Government’s broken promises.

JOURNALIST: The Minister has pointed to a large increase in the number of people on Newstart allowance. Labor moved single parents onto Newstart. Should that be part of what could be reversed?

SHORTEN: This challenge on Newstart is for the Abbott Government to stop seeing unemployment rising, and to get people working. Rather than slug the people who can’t speak for themselves, create some jobs in this country, Tony Abbott. And defend some of the jobs that are already there, like the car industry.

JOURNALIST: The Commission of Audit was to report its finding at the end of the month, but it looks like that’s been delayed now for another two weeks.

SHORTEN: Yeah, what a coincidence. Commission of Audit was due to report until the Griffith by-election was called, now it’s after the Griffith by-election. You know, that stinks. If they’ve got a plan to cut Australians’ conditions, to cut health care, to go after age pensioners, don’t be cowardly. Tell people, let people decide at a by-election what they think. Don’t hide your bad news until after people have voted. That’s cynical.

JOURNALIST: Are there people on Newstart who also get the Disability Pension who can work and that should be moved off welfare?

SHORTEN: People with disabilities, in my experience, would love to work. There are very few people in my experience want to have their disability so they can get a pension. Most people with disabilities – they’d rather have the opportunity to work. So this idea that we blame the victim, that we blame a person because they’ve got a disability, or we blame a person because they’re old, and we say that somehow you’re the problem, we’re all going to be old one day. The sort of country that I want my kids to grow up in, and that I want my parents to grow old in, is not one that has a go at people on the Age Pension. That’s not the Australian way. Thanks everyone.



ENDS

Bill Shorten Opposition Leader, SUBJECT/S: Griffith by-election; Tony Abbott’s Commission of Cuts; Abbott Government cuts to payments; Indonesia-Australia relations; Nauru

Jan 21, 2014

E&OE TRANSCRIPT
INTERVIEW WITH KIERAN GILBERT, SKY AM AGENDA
TUESDAY, 21 JANUARY 2014
BRISBANE



KIERAN GILBERT:  Opposition Leader, Bill Shorten has this week marked 100 days in the job. This morning he’s campaigning in Brisbane with his candidate in the upcoming Griffith by-election, which of course is the seat vacated by the former Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd.

Bill Shorten joins me now, live from the banks of the Brisbane River. Mr Shorten, thanks very much for your time. If we look at the Griffith by-election first of all on February 8. History would say that Labor should win that, the polls would suggest that as well?

SHORTEN:  No I think it’s pretty close actually Keiran. I’m on the ground here, this is my third day of being in the campaign with Labor’s candidate Terri Butler. There’s no doubt that because the election was so recently that it is a difficult fight for Labor. But one of the big issues of course is maintaining our health care system. In Queensland the LNP’s really taken the axe to healthcare services; hospital beds closed, nurses sacked. And of course everyone’s worried about what the Abbott Government will do to Medicare and increase the cost of going to the doctor. So there are real issues around health and our quality of living which are important. But it’s a close election, no question.

GILBERT:  Now as I mentioned in the introduction, you’ve marked 100 days as Opposition Leader. You’ve suggested in a couple of interviews that you’re willing to be constructive when it comes to the Government’s Commission of Audit, that you’re willing to co-operate, yet some of your own MPs are saying that the Audit Commission is simply a Trojan horse for big business. Which is it?

SHORTEN: Let me just explain – as an Opposition Leader I don’t wish to copy Tony Abbott’s mindlessly negative style, because of course if you spend your whole time opposing, if you win an election, you end up like the Abbott Government, breaking your promises because you haven’t done any homework in opposition. But this Commission of Audit, the fact that everything is on the table, well Labor’s not having a bar of that. The Liberal Party at the last election said that health wouldn’t get touched, that education wouldn’t get touched, that defence wouldn’t get touched, they said they weren’t interested in the GST. Now we find out that everything is on the table. There’s no way Labor will be party to rewarding Tony Abbott breaking promises in government.

GILBERT:  If you look at one potential savings in the welfare area, one in five Australians according to the Department of Human Services are now receiving support payments, Kevin Andrews has said this morning that’s unsustainable at $70 billion a year. He’s right isn’t he?

SHORTEN:  I’m a bit alarmed at what Kevin Andrews is saying.  People on the aged pension are getting older, there’s no Abbott Government policy that can make people younger, once you are growing old on the aged pension, that’s it.  What we are concerned about is the Abbott Government is proposing to reduce the rate of increase of the aged pension. Let me repeat that, that’s a big issue. Why on earth should Australians who pay taxes all their life , who are receiving a modest aged pension be told by the Abbott Government, certainly not something they were told before the election, that their rate of the increase of the aged pension could be slowed down. I mean, I don’t know what world the Abbott Government’s living in, but it’s not the real world.

The idea that older Australians who’ve payed taxes their whole life, who are receiving a modest aged pension, would have the rate of increase to the aged pension slowed down. I mean, why is it that the Abbott Government’s view is the only way that Australia can get ahead is putting a GP tax on poor people going to the doctor, is restricting the rate of increase to the aged pension. These guys have never seen a fixed income earner they haven’t wanted to whack.

GILBERT:  But, Mr Shorten, more than one in five Australians are now receiving support payments. In your view is that a sustainable situation, is it sustainable for the Budget?

SHORTEN:  First of all, we run a society and a nation, and what to me is important is what lives people are going to have in the future? It doesn’t seem sensible to me that when you’ve got a challenging budget, and I can see the Government have that challenge, they reach for the rule book which says: let’s go after people that go to the GP, let’s go after aged pensioners.  I mean if this government wanted to save some money, scrap the gold-plated billionaires, millionaires parental leave scheme. Maybe you might want to look at the multi-millionaires who are getting tax free super and have a look at that issue. I mean this is a government who, whenever they see a problem, start with an answer – how do we go after old people, people going to the doctor, people who get low superannuation.

I mean this government’s priorities are all wrong and they certainly Kieran, even if you do or don’t agree that they’re doing what they never told the voters before the election, that’s what I really dislike. The fact is that they were sneaky before the election and they’re being cynical now.

GILBERT: But you’re saying you want to be constructive with any proposals put forward by the Commission of Audit, but every saving that the Government has put up you’ve opposed, even savings that the Labor Government had proposed yourself, so you might be sounding constructive, but you’re actions seem to suggest otherwise.

SHORTEN: Well no, our principle is be constructive. But being constructive doesn’t mean doing over people who have fixed incomes. What’s constructive about agreeing to the Government to take the axe to our healthcare system? To slow the rate of the aged pension?

A lot of the generation ahead of us Kieran worked their whole lives, they paid their taxes, we didn’t have compulsory superannuation for a lot of time the aged pensioners were at work so they didn’t have the chance to get that payment, be able to save for their retirement. And now we’re saying to them, the aged pension, the aged pension is not winning a ticket in Tattslotto, it’s a modest payment. These people in the Abbott Government, say ok, we don’t have any ideas, what will we do? Oh of course, light bulb moment with Tony Abbott’s ministers, let’s go after the aged pension! Why didn’t we think of the before the election? I’ll tell you why, because they weren’t upfront with the Australian people, so yes Kieran, I’ll be constructive, but I’m not going to be complicit in doing over millions of people on the aged pension.

GILBERT:  A couple of issues to wrap up Mr Shorten, a senior Indonesian MP says Australia is stupid for claiming that the Navy had inadvertently made incursions into Indonesian territory. What do you make of that suggestion? The Indonesian MP, a member of their foreign affairs commission saying that the Navy of course knew where they were?

SHORTEN:  First things first, while I think this government, the Abbott Government needs to be upfront with the Australian people on what’s happening, whilst I think they’re being wreckless with our Indonesian relationship, I’m not going to have anyone, whether it’s Scott Morrison or an Indonesian MP pay out on our Navy. Our service people work hard, they go into harms way so we can have the quality of life we do in Australia. They spend long periods of time away from their families. I’ll be very clear, I don’t not believe that what is happening, with Scott Morrison and our relationship with Indonesia, the turmoil in our relationship. I’m not going to start blaming the Navy and I’ll stand up for them, no matter who is criticising them.

GILBERT: This Indonesian MP though says there is no way that the Australian authorities did not know that they had crossed the Indonesian border. Do you think that that’s a fair assessment?

SHORTEN: I’m not about to start blaming our Navy, I think those people on the boats and ships protecting our borders are being asked to enact policies which I believe the Abbott Government’s not being upfront with the Australian people. This is the problem,  when you’ve got a government who before the election said they’d tell everyone what’s going on on a weekly basis and now have gone to ground, then you create oxygen for other people to criticise Australia’s military – well I’m not into that.  I do wish that the Abbott Government would start just being upfront. If you want to defeat comments overseas  paying out on our military and our nation, the best way to do it I think is to just be upfront with your own people, with the Australian taxpayer. Australian citizens are not interested in bagging the military because I think they are doing a great job.  And to all the families of our service personnel, let your husbands and wives know that a lot of people in Australia respect what they are doing.

GILBERT: Finally, the legal crisis in Nauru given our links to the country and reliance on it when it comes to asylum seeker co-operation. Should Australia be demanding a judicial inquiry into that legal crisis which we’ve seen unfold in the last couple of days?

SHORTEN: I think it’s very concerning that you’ve got Australian jurists, eminent Australian lawyers – you’ve got all this kerfuffle with the Nauruan Government, so I am concerned by that. Yet again the first step is, the Abbott Government should come off holidays, they should tell the truth to the Australian people. Explain to us what is going on. In my experience and I’ve got a middle of the road view on a lot of matters, the best way you create a national consensus about what you’re doing, bring people into your trust. If the Abbott Government doesn’t trust the Australian people, to tell them what’s going on in Nauru, or border security, well to me, that’s going to be the seed of their problems in these issues. I find if you tell people upfront what’s going on in terms of these big national matters of immigration and borders, you generally get the Australian people, even if they don’t agree with everything you’re doing. Treating it all as a secret for the Australian people to try and work out what is happening, that’s just not smart.

GILBERT:   Mr Shorten, thanks for your time in Brisbane this morning, appreciate it.


ENDS

BILL SHORTEN LEADER OF THE OPPOSITION, SUBJECT/S: Griffith by-election; Jobs; Health services.

Jan 21, 2014

E&OE TRANSCRIPT
RADIO INTERVIEW
4KQ BRISBANE – LAUREL, GARY & MARK
TUESDAY, 21 JANUARY 2014

LAUREL: Bill Shorten is on the phone this morning. Good morning Bill.

BILL SHORTEN, LEADER OF THE OPPOSITION: Good morning.

LAUREL: Bill, now you’ve got two people in this room who are in that electorate of Griffith. What are you going to be talking about today?

SHORTEN: Terri Butler is Labor’s quality candidate in the seat of Griffith. She’s a working mum who lives locally. She and I will both be talking about making sure that we maintain our standard of living, in particular making sure that we defend our healthcare, our quality healthcare system we have in Queensland and in Australia from further cuts.

HOST: Kevin Rudd was obviously the last sitting member. Preferences did a lot to get him over the line last time. Is it going to be a tight election?

SHORTEN: I think it will be very close. The Abbott Government would have to go in as slight favourites, I have to say, because it’s very close to the general election. However I think even in the last 3 to 4 months people are becoming concerned that the Abbott Government seems to be breaking promises; that they were one thing before the election and another afterwards.

LAUREL: You’re talking about creating jobs, the Labor Party. It’s always fascinating to me, how does a government just say ‘we are going to create jobs’? I mean, you can put people on in the public service, but then of course it’s usually public servants who are first to go when government does budget and wants to cut some money.

SHORTEN: There’s over 8 million people have full-time jobs right now as we talk. There’s another 3 and a half million Australians who have part-time jobs. So one objective of government is to support people in existing jobs. That’s why we’re so disappointed to see the government not even trying to keep the Holden car company in Australia. There’s a cloud over QANTAS, there’s a cloud over the SPC cannery. Partly what a government can do is help have industry policy settings which encourage companies to keep employing existing people.

The other thing when you’re talking about creating new jobs is that confidence is important and so if you’ve got a government who is going to start cutting thousands of jobs from the public service – well, you know, public sector workers live in our community, they do good work. They’re always the whipping boy whenever conservative governments say ‘well, we’ve got to tidy things up’. But these public servants are nurses, they’re orderlies in hospitals, they’re the people who provide our frontline services so that the rest of us can have a very good quality of care.

HOST: Well speaking of jobs, you’ve had yours for 100 days. Bill Shorten, how do you reckon you’ve gone?

SHORTEN: Well, we’ve got a long way to go. We’re not so much looking in the rear-vision mirror at the last 100 days, but to the next 2 and a half years. What I am pleased about is that the Labor party has stopped attacking itself. I think the biggest challenge in the first 100 days has been what has changed since the election.  And I think there is a real storm over whether or not the government would keep their promises before the election to now about our funding in schools.

So I think that part of what we’ve done is try and keep the Abbott Government on track, and try wherever they break promises to call them out and make sure they reconsider their decision to break promises.

LAUREL: Well I can tell you, Bill, that I grew up in Bulimba, do you want me to take you to maybe Cinema café today in Oxford Street, or Pancho’s Pizza? It’s very nice.

SHORTEN: If you have the time, that would be nice.

HOST: Bill, everyone will be asking her for an autograph, not you.

SHORTEN: That’s alright, you know, reflected glory.

LAUREL: Well we welcome you to town, and good luck today. It’s going to be a big day for you. Bill Shorten, thanks for chatting to us.

SHORTEN: You all have a lovely morning too, cheerio.

LAUREL: He’s a nice bloke.


ENDS

Newman’s CBD asset firesale during market downturn: Pitt

Media Release

Shadow Treasurer Curtis Pitt said Campbell Newman’s secret CBD asset sale was conducted during the worst market conditions in living memory, according to figures from the Government’s own highly-paid property advisor.

Mr Pitt said the new figures, from Jones Lang LaSalle and reported in the AFR, come on top of the Auditor-General’s reports showing the “good deal” touted by Treasurer Tim Nicholls to justify a new Executive Building would cost taxpayers $2.6 billion.

“Mr Nicholls has ensured taxpayers will be out of pocket by $2.6 billion. He is the one who sold the seven buildings for $237 million less than their value. He is the one whose ‘good deal’ will see taxpayers hand over $1.2 billion for renting back the seven building and a further $1.2 billion for renting the new Executive Building but never owning any of them,” Mr Pitt said.

“Now with rental vacancies reportedly increasing by 50% over the year, it’s clear that you couldn’t have picked a worse time to flog off seven commercial buildings in the CBD."

“By selling them off at the bottom of the market, and without a competitive tender process taxpayers got the worst possible result, as highlighted by the Auditor-General in his scathing report in December."

“This whole process has been a shambles from start to the finish, and the blame should lie directly at the feet of the Premier and the Treasurer.”

Mr Pitt said with so much vacant office space in the CBD, it beggars belief that the Premier would waste billions building himself a brand new office tower.

“There is a glut of office space in the CBD yet Campbell Newman sees fit to waste taxpayers’ money on a brand new executive office tower with riverside views and a secret underground tunnel to Parliament House."

“All the while our unemployment rate has risen to GFC levels and our regions are crying out for infrastructure investment and job creation initiatives."


“It goes to show that the Premier simply puts his own vanity and self-importance first, and the jobs and prosperity of Queenslanders a distant last.”