Thursday, 31 May 2018

Life on the breadline: Knowing what you can live without becomes an essential skill

Extract from The Guardian


One big meal a day means skipping things that for most are a daily given

Name: Mick Smart
Age: 32
Turning point: Was injured falling down a retaining wall as a work-for-the-dole contractor. Now suffers chronic pain and mobility issues and is unable to find work.
Lives: Lakes Entrance, Victoria.
After housing costs has to live on: $245 a week.
The last few months have been quite a test of mettle – physically, emotionally and spiritually – with the anniversary of my injuries during work for the dole approaching. It serves as a reminder of two years struggling with chronic pain and the financial stress of being trapped on unemployment. Where being frugal means going without, while trying to save becomes increasingly difficult when accounting for medical expenses regardless of an incredibly small budget.           
Almost everything is a balancing act, sacrificing something you want for something you may need later in the week – knowing what you can live without and how to bulk buy “on the cheap” becomes an essential skill. My one big meal a day means skipping things that for most are a daily given, like phone and internet, travel and transport, seeing a show, going out with friends. Everything gets put on pause while attempting to manage a fortnightly budget, with every day a reminder that you’re poor.
I live with my partner and all our belongings are stuffed into a spare bedroom at the grace of her family – surviving unemployment has a fair amount to do with the generosity of others.
We want to start a life together in our own place but I can’t afford bond let alone weekly rent. I can’t afford a ring for our engagement or even a pet together and, as for career goals, I am neither certified nor have the necessary experience for most of the jobs available, especially since I have spent most of my life as a manual labourer in some form or another. Each day is about pain management and treatment for a back injury, so manual labour is definitely out of the question. I can’t even do a stack of dishes or go for a walk without suffering the consequences.

"I have been with multiple job agencies for three years and not even once have we discussed a potential job"

I’ve been with my partner for four years and, as she’s spent the last two years of our relationship putting up with my pain and emotional instability, she remains my queen. She shops when I cannot and is by my side through countless doctor appointments and hospital visits, helping keep my sanity and dignity while I’m hobbling around on a cane. She is and continues to be the silver lining to what has been a terrible situation that would have ended me if not for her support.
I have been with multiple job agencies for three years and not even once have we discussed a potential job. My life is full of seemingly endless and ultimately pointless appointments, and every fortnight comes with a reminder of “mutual” obligation activities – volunteering, mandatory job searches, bogus training programs – all with an assessed work capacity that seems to disregard my medical condition.

Mick Smart and girlfriend Marnie
Mick Smart and his girlfriend, Marnie, share a laugh after Mick’s daily stretching routine. Photograph: Chris Hopkins for the Guardian

There are 30 hours a fortnight of work activity requirements when I can barely manage general daily function, and having my payments subtly or directly threatened seems more about compliance than it does “support”. This practice continues with even my current DES [Disability Employment Services] job agent, set inside a recently closed optometry store that is now up for lease.
The front half of the store sits empty, then there is a tiny storage room with a few stacked boxes, a non-functional office printer and a dentist’s chair that just so happens to be used for fitting dentures on the weekend, and way in the back sits my employment consultant. On the desk a hand me down-looking laptop tethered to a mobile network for internet, a notepad and pen for jotting down notes about my efforts at gaining work or study.
The whole process makes me feel swept aside, degraded, humiliated and abandoned, my way of life destroyed and left with daily chronic pain, a monster I have to now manage while also juggling these unnecessary hurdles.
Nobody wants my recovery or return to work more than me but not only am I now a liability to employers in my current condition, but I am still investigating and seeking treatment for an injury for which I believe work for the dole is ultimately responsible. I’m constantly waiting on specialists, attending physio, trying to climb my way back out after falling down the rabbit hole and hitting rock bottom.
I continue to fight for my health and happiness while both broke and unemployed. I spend each day and sometimes multiple times a day doing stretches to recondition my spine and meditation to combat stress. I also lightly exercise at least three to five times a week and go for short walks when I can, but overall every day is about recovery and pain management.
I converse with chronic pain groups, volunteer my creative skills to produce design or social media projects for multiple unions, like the Anti-Poverty Network SA and the Australian Unemployed Workers’ Union. There can be no match to the level of support I have received from these groups – even simply talking to others who likewise struggle with unemployment. It keeps me afloat.

Coalition accused of shelving plans for payday lending crackdown

Legislation has failed to materialise – and Labor says conservative backbenchers are to blame

The federal government has been accused of indefinitely shelving plans for a crackdown on dodgy payday lending operators after a significant lobbying effort from the industry.
The Coalition had promised to usher in strict new rules on payday lending last year, after a 2016 review found they were being inappropriately handed to low-income and vulnerable Australians. The high-interest, high-fee cash advances can trap people in cycles of debt.
Cash Converters, one of the largest lenders, was ordered to refund $10.8m and pay a $1.35m penalty in 2016 after the corporate regulator found it was lending to people without checking their capacity to repay.
Payday lenders have engaged multiple lobbyists and Labor says a group of conservative backbenchers, whom it dubs “the parliamentary friends of payday lending”, has formed to pressure the government.
At the last estimates, Treasury officials said they expected the legislation to be introduced by April, which passed without any sign of the legislation. On Tuesday Treasury officials were unable to give any new timeframe, saying it was a matter for the government.
That has prompted shadow treasurer, Chris Bowen, to accuse the government of shelving the plans “indefinitely”.
“Once again, it’s the conservative backbench, including the ‘parliamentary friends of payday lending’, setting this government’s agenda – not the cabinet, not the relevant ministers, and certainly not the prime minister,” he said.
But the assistant minister to the treasurer, Michael Sukkar, said the government would progress legislation this year, with changes applying 12 months after the bill’s passage.
“The government is currently considering the submissions it received following public consultation on exposure draft legislation in late 2017,” he said. “Legislation will be progressed this year with the changes applying 12 months after its passage.”
“Implementation of these reforms will ensure vulnerable consumers are afforded appropriate levels of protection while allowing consumers to continue to access small amount credit contracts and consumer leases.”
In estimates on Tuesday the Labor senator Chris Ketter said he was “at a loss to understand” the delays, and asked the Treasury deputy secretary John Lonsdale what was taking so long. Lonsdale said the policy was contested and that it was not unusual for the government to take time to consider both sides of the debate.
“It is not unusual, in my experience, that government would weigh up arguments, on both sides, very carefully before coming to a decision,” he said.
Lonsdale took exception to the suggestion that there had been a delay. “The way I would rephrase the question … is when will legislation be introduced? And that is a matter for government, senator.”
Among other things, the 2016 review recommended a cap on the amount of payday loan repayments to 10% of a person’s net income. It also called for lenders to be barred from bombarding borrowers with continued offers of credit. 

Wednesday, 30 May 2018

Treasury figures reveal extent Coalition's tax cuts will benefit the wealthy

Extract from The Guardian



The Turnbull government has released more detail about the income tax cuts that will apply to workers on high incomes over the three tranches of the $144bn package unveiled on budget night.
The government on budget night confirmed that a worker on a taxable income of $200,000 would get a tax cut worth $7,225 by the time the final stage of the budget plan takes effect.
Treasury officials on Tuesday tabled new figures breaking down the yearly gains to workers on various income levels as step two and step three of the tax package take effect.
The detailed breakdowns confirm several independent analyses released after the budget suggesting workers on high incomes will benefit significantly when the second and third stage of the government’s plan takes effect.
A worker on $200,000 with a tax liability of $67,232 will get a tax cut of $7,225 when the government’s plan to abolish the 37% tax bracket kicks in.
Workers on $130,000 will gain $450 when the 37% bracket goes, workers on $140,000 will get $900, $150,000 will get $1,350, $160,000 will get $1,800, $170,000 will get $2,250, $180,000 will get $2,700, $190,000 will get $3,950 and workers on $200,000 will get $5,200.
By contrast a worker on a taxable income of $60,000, with a tax liability of $12,147, will get an annual tax cut worth $540 as a consequence of increasing the $37,000 threshold to $41,000.
When introducing legislation giving effect to the measure last week, the government confirmed the cost of the first two tranches of its tax package was $102.35bn over a decade, with the third phase costing about $40bn from its introduction in 2024 to the financial year 2028-29.
Labor has been seeking year-on-year costings for the package after the forward estimates since the tax plan was revealed on 8 May.
But Treasury officials declined to share year-on-year costings when asked by the Labor senator Jenny McAllister to produce them on Tuesday. The officials confirmed they had calculated year-on-year costings but declined to produce them on the basis the figures were unreliable.
The finance minister, Mathias Cormann, said it was standard practice not to supply those figures because the accuracy of medium-term costings could not be guaranteed.
The shadow treasurer, Chris Bowen, said on Tuesday that Labor supported the first phase of the tax cuts. The proposed low and middle-income tax offset will give $530 to 4.4 million taxpayers with incomes between $48,000 and $90,000 in 2018-19.
Labor is keeping its options open on phase two of the package, and has been critical of the government’s plan to flatten the income tax scales.

'Failing' affordable housing system 'requires decisive federal leadership'

Extract from The Guardian

Academics call for independent advisory body and long-term approach

A national housing strategy is needed to fix Australia’s “failing” affordable housing system, according to a report from academics at the University of Sydney, the University of New South Wales and Curtin University.
The report, released by the Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute on Tuesday, called for a coordinated “whole-of-government” approach and decisive federal leadership.
It said Australia’s housing policy was “weak and/or inappropriate” and public funding was inadequate.
Australia has a shortfall of more than 200,000 affordable dwellings. In New South Wales there are more than 60,000 households on the social and affordable housing waiting list, and more new dwellings were constructed between 1990 and 1995 than 1995 and 2010.
The report’s authors said Western Australia, South Australia and the Australian Capital Territory had developed effective housing plans that the federal government should follow. Overseas, the UK and Canada had also set up national strategies that Australia should learn from.
The report praised the WA government for its 2010 affordable housing strategy, which delivered its target of 20,000 affordable dwellings five years ahead of schedule.
South Australia also created 5,485 affordable dwellings between 2005 and 2015 through inclusionary planning – a policy that requires new developments to provide a certain percentage of affordable houses, or gives incentives to do so.
Under the SA scheme, the 5,485 affordable houses made up 17% of the state’s new housing supply.
In NSW, a similar 2009 scheme created only 2,000 affordable rental dwellings in Sydney, less than 1% of the total new developments over the same period.
The report’s authors stressed that inclusionary planning – which relies on private development – should “never be seen as an alternative” to the government’s own duty to provide funding and construction for affordable homes.
Instead they called for an independent national housing advisory body, and for a long-term, “resilient” strategy that could “survive a change of government”.
“A key lesson from both the NSW program and parts of the ACT strategy was the difficulty in sustaining the housing outcomes after the original political champion(s) had moved on,” the report said.
They also praised the ACT’s housing strategy – which provides for an affordable land price scheme – and the Indigenous housing program developed in the east Kimberly by the Wunan Foundation.
The Wunan project was an “illustration of just how a driven collection of individuals can make a real difference if provided with the support to implement ideas”, they said.
Previous national schemes were found to have had an effect but all had been discontinued after a few years. A 2009-12 initiative provided $5.7bn of funding and constructed 19,700 new dwellings nationally.
The 2008 national rental affordability scheme provided tax incentives for investors to build new housing and rent at below-market rates – creating 36,700 privately owned affordable houses – but the scheme was discontinued in 2014 and rents will start to become uncapped in 2018.
Since 2017 the national disability insurance scheme has provided for the construction of 16,000 affordable housing units designed for people with severe functional impairment or very high support needs, costing $700m annually.

Ceasefire urged in Coalition's climate and energy wars

Extract from The Guardian

2017 was a standout year for renewables, the Clean Energy Council says as it calls for ‘policy certainty’ in 2018

The emissions reduction target in the national energy guarantee is too low to encourage the development of renewable energy projects on a scale sufficient to drive down power prices as Australia’s ageing coal plants retire, according to the Clean Energy Council.
A new report from the council, to be released on Wednesday, says 2017 was a standout year for the renewable energy industry, with the largest domestic rollout of rooftop solar in history, and 16 large-scale renewable energy projects completed, adding 700 megawatts of new generation to the mix.
But the CEC’s chief executive, Kane Thornton, is continuing to express concern that there is still no long-term unifying energy or climate policy in place, and says the level of emissions reduction planned under the government’s national energy guarantee “is unlikely to encourage the new renewable energy to continue to drive down power prices as our old coal power plants continue to close”.
The council is converging on Canberra this week, as the launch of the report on the state of the renewables sector coincides with another bout of unrest within the Coalition party room over the national energy guarantee.
With the energy minister, Josh Frydenberg, due to meet his state counterparts in August in an effort to secure their approval for the national energy guarantee, the former prime minister Tony Abbott on Tuesday challenged Frydenberg, arguing that the policy should come back to the Coalition party room for debate before the critical August meeting.
Frydenberg rebuffed that push, saying he would bring legislation giving effect to the policy back to the party room after any agreement was struck with the states – without reopening the internal debate the Coalition settled last October.
Abbott’s challenge followed a government MP raising concerns about the impact of high power prices on businesses in his electorate. The chair of the backbench committee on environment and energy, Craig Kelly, also declared that the government needed to do more to differentiate its policies from Labor’s.
While Thornton says public discussion about the national energy guarantee appears to be moving in a constructive direction, the CEC report notes the history of politics scuttling sensible outcomes and observes that Australia remains a distance short of settling its decade-long climate and energy wars.
“In June 2017, chief scientist Dr Alan Finkel delivered a suite of 50 recommendations to improve Australia’s energy security, which became known in industry circles as the Finkel report. The government moved quickly to adopt 49 of these, but ultimately voted to reject the primary recommendation – the introduction of a clean energy target to take effect beyond 2020.”
The report notes that the clean energy target was backed by the energy sector, the business community, the clean energy industry and federal Labor but it was scuttled because of internal opposition within the Coalition, with “a backbench revolt” killing the Finkel recommendation.
Consultations about the national energy guarantee are not yet resolved, it says, noting that state governments have stepped into the breach. “Given the significant uncertainty and relatively low level of ambition on clean energy and emissions reduction from the federal government, many state governments have introduced their own policies and targets.
“This will help to secure job and investment benefits from renewable energy projects as well as helping Australia to meet its emission reduction commitments.”
The report says there are enough projects in the system to meet the 2020 renewable energy target, which underscores a boom in the sector over the past couple of years.
But it points out that the investment boom has followed policy certainty. Investment in renewables stalled when Abbott attempted to wind back the renewable energy target after he won the 2013 election, and rebounded once the ensuing political dispute was settled.
The report says that trajectory “shows that long-term bipartisan policy has been critical for investment in the energy sector, and that policy certainty beyond 2020 is becoming increasingly urgent”. 

Twelve regional TV stations on notice after failing to meet local content obligations

Extract from ABC News

Posted about an hour ago

Twelve regional television stations have been put on notice after a new report found they had failed to meet local content obligations in 2017.

Key points:

  • Networks have obligation to broadcast local content in return for access to broadcast spectrum
  • Metro TV stations meet obligation but increasingly rely on New Zealand content
  • Screen Producers Association says failure to deliver Australian stories is a disgrace

Figures compiled by broadcast regulator the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) reveal for the second consecutive year, TV channels outside of the capital cities screened insufficient Australian programming.
All regional TV operators must air 1,400 hours of Australian programs each year on their multi-channels, in addition to content requirements on their main channel, but, in the worst case, WIN TV Griffith fell short by 300 hours.
Two of Eastern Australia Satellite's channels aired 200 hours less than the requirement. Even Alice Springs' Indigenous TV Imparja failed to make the grade.
Screen Producers Association chief executive Matt Deaner described the failure as a disgrace.
"This is really significant, the broadcasters have an obligation to the Australian public in exchange for receiving spectrum that is about delivering Australian stories and various types of Australian content from sport, to drama, to news, to kids' programs," he said.
"I cannot understand why it's been so difficult, because there's a lot of great Australian content that goes for many hours, it's not a difficult task."


Broadcasters traditionally pay annual licence fees to the federal government in exchange for access to the spectrum, which is publicly owned.
They did not pay additional licence fees when they commenced multi-channel broadcasting, but they were asked to air local content. That content did not have to be new content.
They were also given time to adjust to the regulatory framework, but now that they are being assessed they have been found to have fallen short.
"It's not a difficult thing for them to run repeats; this is not about the obligation to deliver new content, it's just about any Australian content. It's what audiences want to see," Mr Deaner said.

ACMA chooses to waive requirements

ACMA decided to exercise "forbearance" in regard to three regional channels that failed to meet their requirements in 2016. The latest transgressors have been given a waiver too.


In a statement, ACMA said all the affected regional channels were recipients of Nine Network programming which was altered without warning.
"The detriment to affected audiences was relatively low, as all the Australian programs provided on 9Life had already been broadcast on licensees' primary channel [and] the amount of Australian content broadcast on the primary channel far exceeded the multichannel transmission shortfall for all 12 regional licensees," the statement read.
"The ACMA considered [that] forbearance was preferable in the circumstances to regulatory options such as enforceable undertakings, remedial directions or the pursuit of civil penalties."
Opposition communications spokeswoman Michelle Rowland said last year Labor supported the Government's decision to give broadcasters relief from paying their licence fees — worth $127 million — while they adjusted to the advent of unregulated streaming services such as Netflix.
"It's disappointing to see these breaches, but there's actually no information in the ACMA compliance report as to why the breaches occurred, so we will follow this up in the Parliament to find out what's going on," she said.

New Zealand content props up obligation in metro areas

Concern about regulation failures does not end there.
All of Australia's 15 metro TV networks met their obligations, but the figures reveal they have increasingly relied on New Zealand programming to do so.



The Nine Network used 57 hours of New Zealand drama to meet its local program target. Seven used 290 hours of New Zealand programming.
You won't see Thorney's Cooking Central TV show on Channel Seven, but tucked away on 7TWO you will find the culinary adventures of former All Black turned cook Grahame Thorne.
New Zealand shows have qualified as Australian ever since a High Court decision 20 years ago deemed them equal under the Australia and New Zealand Closer Economic Relations Trade Agreement.
Audience tastes prevented the networks from scheduling New Zealand shows, which are cheaper to acquire than Australian programs, on their main channels at prime time.
After the advent of multi-channelling, the networks began to exploit the loophole in earnest.
"It goes without saying over-reliance on NZ content has an impact on our ability as a nation to tell our own stories and it's certainly not a sustainable position to have this sort of reliance," Ms Rowland said.


There are bright spots. The Nine Network on Sunday launched its new Australian reality series Love Island on multi-channel 9Go!
Mr Deaner said, "You see Love Island premiering on [NineGo], so they're starting to use those services more interestingly".
ACMA's regulation report is compiled from figures supplied by the networks.
The annual review was published two months late, on a Friday afternoon before a long weekend in Canberra, at the end of a week when the Communications Minister and ACMA had been quizzed before Senate Estimates.
It is also a year after the Federal Government lanced a major TV review, wherein the networks asked for relief from their Australian content commitments.
That review was delivered to Communications Minister Mitch Fifield in December, but has not been released.

So, it is no surprise none of the TV stations contacted by the ABC, nor industry body Free TV, wanted to talk about this particular report card.

Tuesday, 29 May 2018

Naplan testing will be made obsolete, New South Wales education boss says


Mark Scott echoes state education minister’s criticism, saying more individualised testing will replace Naplan
The head of the New South Wales education department, Mark Scott, has said Naplan testing will be made “obsolete” by more sophisticated student assessment methods.
Scott joined NSW education minister Rob Stokes’ recent criticism of the testing regime, telling the ABC on Tuesday that he favoured a shift to smaller, more individualised testing regimes.
“We all know that these smaller tests, these regular ongoing assessments that take place by teachers in classrooms to monitor progress, that this is the way that good assessment happens,” he told the ABC.
“My feeling is that when we prioritise and develop these tools and roll them out, then Naplan will look a little tired, a little simple, a little dated, and so we need to get on with the new reform process.”
The second Gonski report, released at the end of April, advocated for an end to the “industrial model” of mass education, and instead called for more focus on individual learning progress by using diagnostic tools to help teachers identify “dark spots” in students’ learning.
Scott’s said that kind of individualised testing would eventually supersede Naplan.
“I think it will become obsolete because the kinds of information that the new assessment schemes will give us will be richer and deeper and more meaningful for teachers, for parents and for education systems,” he said.
The comments come in the context of increasing criticism of the Naplan testing regime.
Stokes has become a vocal opponent of the test, saying it has been used as a school rating system rather than a measurement of student progress.
“I am all for transparency but this is not transparency – this is actually dishonesty,” he said earlier in May.
The Australian Capital Territory’s education minister, Yvette Berry, said she had similar concerns, believing “that the high-stakes culture around Naplan may be doing more harm than good”.
“In the ACT we see the current school-level reporting on MySchool as contributing to the league table culture and to residualisation and inequity in some schools,” she said.
In April a report commissioned by the New South Wales Teachers Federation by the retired Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor Les Perelman called the test “bizarre” and found that it rewarded students for using big words rather than clear expression.
But Simon Birmingham, the federal education minister, has insisted Naplan testing “serves a very important purpose for many Australian parents”.
“Parents make clear they want to see how their children are progressing, they want to know whether their children are learning the basics of literacy and numeracy that Naplan assesses,” he said earlier this month.