Extract from The Guardian
Malcolm Turnbull is paving the way for a double
dissolution election unless both houses of parliament pass
legislation to curb the influence of trade unions
Malcolm Turnbull at a press conference on
Wednesday. The minister for employment, Michaelia Cash, (right) said
the Liberal party would happily fight an election over trade union
corruption and misconduct. Photograph: Saeed Khan/AFP/Getty Images
Thursday 31 December 2015 17.21 AEDT
Unions have vowed to “throw everything including
the kitchen sink” at an election fought on industrial relations,
after the prime minister warned the issue would be front and centre
of the Coalition’s campaign unless certain bills were passed.
On Wednesday, Malcolm Turnbull paved the way for a
double
dissolution election on workplace reforms unless both houses of
Parliament passed legislation aimed at curbing the influence of
unions by establishing the Australian Building and Construction
Commission and a new national regulator for registered organisations.
The employment minister, Michaelia
Cash, reiterated that sentiment on Thursday.
“We are more than happy to fight trade union
governance, corruption, misconduct and not standing up for the
worker. We will happily fight that at an election,” she told
Channel 7.
Unions have blasted the formation of the two
bodies and have pledged to fight the proposed measures.
“We will throw whatever we can, including the
kitchen sink ... at opposing the obnoxious Coalition
attack on workers,” assistant national secretary of the Maritime
Union of Australia, Ian Bray, told Guardian Australia.
Acting general secretary of the New South Wales
Nurses and Midwives’ Union, Judith Kiejda, said members were not
going to simply “sit back and accept” Coalition proposals to
change workers’ pay and conditions.“Be that at their peril, if
they try that,” she warned.
A union campaign on industrial affairs harks back
to the 2007 federal election, when the John Howard-led Coalition lost
a bruising battle on WorkChoices laws. The unions’ response to
WorkChoices, the Your Rights at Work campaign, was a major
contributor to Howard’s election defeat.
Bray said the issues highlighted in the Your
Rights at Work campaign were still present.
Workers in 2007 were concerned about job
insecurity and a reduction in pay and conditions, Bray said.
“Those issues are as relevant today as they were
in 2007,” he said.
National secretary of the Construction, Forestry,
Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU) Dave Noonan said “demonising”
trade unions plays well with conservative voters.
Noonan said the Coalition would use “fear and
loathing to demonise the trade union movement” in the next federal
election.
“It’s red meat to the zoo animals,” Noonan
told Guardian Australia. “It may help them with their base ...
[but] is it going to be a vote changer?”
Anti-corruption expert Adam Graycar said limiting
the election debate to trade union corruption could backfire for the
Coalition.
“My guess is that there are bigger issues of
concern [to voters],” he said. “If the prime minister were to
fight on simple black and white terms, that would not resonate. It
needs to be bigger than that.”
He said society needed to have a broader
conversation about ethical leadership and corruption in business and
non-government organisations, too.
Turnbull highlighted instances of corruption
within trade unions in delivering the government’s response to a
royal
commission into the topic, which issued its final report on
Wednesday.
Opening up old Coalition wounds on industrial
relations could have a negative impact on Turnbull. The prime
minister’s polling success has, in part, hinged on differentiating
himself from his predecessor Tony Abbott, who instigated the royal
commission in the first place.
“Turnbull has not changed a full stop or comma
in any of the Coalition’s policies,” Kiejda said. “It’s all
just marketing.”
“For all his talk about being different, he’ll
just toe the line of Tony Abbott,” Labor’s employment spokesman,
Brendan O’Connor,said. “He wants to continue the ideological bent
[against unions].”
“The prime minister is being pushed to this by
extreme ideologues within his own party,” the acting national
secretary of the Electrical Trades Union, Michael Wright, said. “When
Abbott and the hard right say jump, Malcolm jumps.”
Bray agreed. “It’s not the leader, it’s the
party,” he said. “A leopard doesn’t change its spots.”
O’Connor warned focusing on trade union
corruption was the “mother of all distractions”, taking the focus
away from cutting penalty rates and other proposals put forward in
the recently-released
productivity commission report into industrial relations reforms.
Some union officials have expressed concerns that
the government’s focus on trade unions is designed to cut the
movement off at the knees so that future battles, like one on penalty
rates, were harder to fight.
“The intention [of the royal commission report]
is to introduce laws that limit unions’ ability to campaign
politically,” Noonan said. “What other institution in society is
going to stand up for these industrial issues?”
“A lot of the Liberals haven’t forgotten or
forgiven 2007,” he said.
The money to fund large campaigns from union
membership is also drying up, with the percentage of workers who are
in unions falling from 20% in 2009 to 17%
in 2013.
In May, delegates at the Australian Council of
Trade Unions congress voted to create a $13m “war chest” designed
to make the peak union body a permanent campaigning organisation. The
money was to be raised by charging union affiliates an additional
levy.
“If there’s an early election we’ll be ready
but this is about unions campaigning on the issues that matter to
working people permanently, regardless of who is in government,”
ACTU secretary Dave Oliver said.
The ACTU also announced in March that it would
employ full-time campaigners in 20 marginal seats to fight against
the re-election of the Coalition, a strategy rooted in the Your
Rights at Work campaign.
Shorten, used Twitter to declare Labor was ready to fight a
campaign on industrial relations.
Labor has proposed its own set of industrial
relations changes aimed at stamping out trade union corruption,
including increasing the penalties for officials who breach civil or
criminal law and giving the Australian Securities and Investments
Commission greater powers to investigate registered organisations.
No comments:
Post a Comment