Contemporary politics,local and international current affairs, science, music and extracts from the Queensland Newspaper "THE WORKER" documenting the proud history of the Labour Movement.
MAHATMA GANDHI ~ Truth never damages a cause that is just.
Tuesday, 31 July 2018
Australia's richest 20% own almost two thirds of country's wealth, report finds
About 647,000 single Australians receive Newstart and youth allowance.
Photograph: Julian Smith/AAP
For Sherri Prendergrast, life on Centrelink can feel like being stuck inside a feedback loop.
“It just takes up everything,” the 22-year-old from Glenorchy, in
Hobart’s northern suburbs, told Guardian Australia. “There’s this huge
stigma around being on government benefits, like you’re too lazy to
work. So you feel all this pressure to get a job.
“But then you get knocked back and knocked back and knocked back.
People always tell me to volunteer to get experience. That’s a great
idea, but if you’re on Centrelink you barely have enough money to pay
rent so even the cost of travelling to do that is too much.”
Prendergrast is about to transition from youth allowance to Newstart,
which will bump her fortnightly income from $445 to about $538.
She’s
far from alone – about 647,000 single Australians receive Newstart and
youth allowance – but a new report from the Australian Council of Social
Services and the University of New South Wales suggests she may be
right that fewer people understand what it’s like to live in the
country’s lowest income bracket.
The Inequality
in Australia report maps changes in income and wealth inequality over
time. Released on Tuesday, the report paints a picture of a country
increasingly divided by its back pocket.
It says the richest 20% of Australian households own 62% of all
wealth, while the lowest 50% own just 18%. The average household wealth
in the highest 20% group is $2.9m, five times that of the middle 20% and
almost a hundred times that of the lowest 20% at $30,000.
The report found that a person with a household income in the highest
20% of the population has five times the disposable income of the
lowest 20%.
At the extreme end of the scale, the top 1% have an average weekly
disposable income 26 times the income of a person in the lowest 5%.
Acoss chief executive Cassandra Goldie said the report’s
findings “deeply challenges our sense of Australia as an egalitarian
country”.
“The Australian experience in recent decades shows that inequality
has increased strongly in economic boom times and flattened with a
slower economy and slow wage growth across the board,” she said.
“We should not accept increased inequality as an inevitable byproduct of growth.”
While income inequality has stagnated since the global financial
crisis, the report warns that “inconsistent social security policies”
such as the decision to freeze Newstart payments
while indexing pensions to earnings, along with “a long-term trend
towards greater inequality in hourly wage rates, and growing inequality
in the distribution of wealth” were “likely to reassert themselves and
increase inequality once stronger economic growth is restored”.
But while income inequality has slowed, household wealth has become
even more concentrated thanks in part to “generous tax treatment for
superannuation and a property boom”.
Wealth
inequality increased most strongly between people under 35 years,
thanks mainly to “rapid growth in the average value of shares, financial
and business assets and investment property held by younger
households”, and the concentration of these assets in wealthier, younger
households.
Prendergrast said she could see the differences in income among her peers.
“You can see it. It feels like everyone else my age is out partying
and seeing their friends all of the time and I’m at home applying for
jobs ,” she said.
“It can be frustrating because some people are born with privileges
that they can’t control. They don’t see that they’ve got a leg up
already to getting decent jobs and things like that. It makes it
difficult to join in.”
No comments:
Post a Comment