Extract from ABC News
Ukraine's air force has claimed to have downed a Russian hypersonic missile over Kyiv using newly acquired American Patriot defence systems, the apparent first time the country has been able to intercept one of Moscow's most modern missiles.
Key points:
- A Ukrainian newspaper has quoted military officials as saying Russian forces had used "phosphorus and incendiary ammunition" in Bakhmut
- Ukraine's Special Operations Forces have released footage of Bakhmut, seemingly been attacked by a kind of incendiary weapon
Ukraine says a Russian hypersonic missile flying over Kyiv was downed using the newly acquired US Patriot defence system
Air Force commander Mykola Oleshchuk said in a Telegram post that the Kinzhal-type ballistic missile had been intercepted in an overnight attack on the Ukrainian capital earlier in the week.
It was also the first time Ukraine is known to have used the Patriot defence systems.
"Yes, we shot down the 'unique' Kinzhal," Mr Oleshchuk wrote.
"It happened during the night time attack on May 4 in the skies of the Kyiv region."
Mr Oleshchuk said the Kh-47 missile was launched by a MiG-31K aircraft from the Russian territory and was shot down with a Patriot missile.
The Kinzhal is one of the latest and most advanced Russian weapons. The Russian military says the air-launched ballistic missile has a range of up to 2,000 kilometres and flies at 10 times the speed of sound, making it hard to intercept.
A combination of hypersonic speed and a heavy warhead allows the Kinzhal to destroy heavily fortified targets, like underground bunkers or mountain tunnels.
The Ukrainian military has previously admitted lacking assets to intercept the Kinzhals.
"They were saying that the Patriot is an outdated American weapon, and Russian weapons are the best in the world," Air Force spokesman Yurii Ihnat said on Ukraine's Channel 24 television.
"Well, there is confirmation that it effectively works against even a super hypersonic missile." Mr Ihnat said.
He said successfully intercepting the Kinzhal is "a slap in the face for Russia."
Ukraine took its first delivery of the Patriot missiles in late April. It has not specified how many of the systems it has or where they have been deployed, but they are known to have been provided by the United States, Germany and the Netherlands.
Germany and the US have acknowledged each sending at least one system and the Netherlands has said it has provided two, though it is not clear how many are currently in operation.
Ukrainian troops have received the extensive training needed to be able to effectively locate a target with the systems, lock on with radar and fire. Each battery requires up to 90 personnel to operate and maintain.
'Ukraine has capability to attack now'
The Patriot was first deployed by the US in the 1980s. The system costs approximately $4 million ($5.9 million) per missile, and the launchers cost about $10 million each, according to analysts.
At such a cost, it was widely thought that Ukraine would only use the Patriots against Russian aircraft or hypersonic missiles.
In a Telegram post on Saturday, Valerii Zaluzhnyi, the commander-in-chief of Ukraine's Armed Forces, said he had thanked US General Mark Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, for the ongoing American aid to Ukraine.
Mr Zaluzhnyi said he also briefed General Milley "about the situation at the front and preparations" for Ukraine's counteroffensive against Russia.
Ukraine has not said when it might launch the counteroffensive, but it is widely anticipated in the coming weeks.
In an interview this week with Foreign Affairs magazine, General Milley said he would not speculate on if or when it might come, but that with NATO assistance to help train and equip nine brigades' worth of combined arms, armour and mechanised infantry, "the Ukrainians right now have the capability to attack."
He also said that their capability to defend was "significantly enhanced from what they were just a year ago".
"I don't want to suggest that they may or may not conduct an offensive operation in the coming weeks," he said.
"That'll be up to them. They've got a significant amount of planning and coordination and all of that to do, if they were to do an offensive operation. But they're prepared to do offence or defence."
Russia accused of using phosphorous weapons
Ukraine's Special Operations Forces has accused Russia of using phosphorous munitions in its attempt to wrest control of the eastern city of Bakhmut from Ukrainian forces.
Russian troops have been trying to take the city for more than nine months, but Ukrainian forces are still clinging to positions on the western edge of the city.
On Saturday, the Ukrainska Pravda newspaper quoted military officials as saying that "the enemy used phosphorus and incendiary ammunition in Bakhmut in an attempt to wipe the city off the face of the earth."
A photo accompanying the newspaper report showed an urban area lit up with fire in multiple places.
The allegations could not be independently verified.
Russian forces have not commented on the claim but have rejected previous accusations from Ukraine that they had used phosphorus.
International law prohibits the use of white phosphorus or other incendiary weapons — munitions designed to set fire to objects or cause burn injuries — in areas where there could be concentrations of civilians.
White phosphorous can also be used for illumination or to create smoke screens.
Russia blames Ukraine, US for car bomb that wounded writer
A prominent Russian nationalist writer, Zakhar Prilepin, was wounded in a car bombing that killed his driver on Saturday.
Investigators said a detained suspect admitted acting on behalf of Ukraine.
The attack took place three days after the Kremlin said Ukraine attempted to hit the Kremlin with drones — Ukraine denied it had anything to do with the attack.
Russia's Foreign Ministry accused Ukraine and the Western states backing it, particularly the United States, for the latest attack on the writer, an ardent proponent of Moscow's military campaign in Ukraine.
Ukraine's security services, in its standard response, refused to confirm or deny involvement. A senior Ukrainian official accused Russia of staging the incident.
Russia's state Investigative Committee said Mr Prilepin's car was blown up in a village in Nizny Novgorod region, about 400 kilometres east of Moscow, which it was treating as an act of terrorism.
The governor of Nizhny Novgorod region, Gleb Nikitin, said on Telegram that doctors had successfully operated on Mr Prilepin and that he was now under sedation to help his recovery.
The committee released a photograph showing the white vehicle lying overturned on a track next to a wood, with a deep crater beside it and pieces of metal strewn nearby.
The committee later issued a statement saying investigators were questioning a suspect identified as Alexander Permyakov.
"The suspect was detained and, in the course of questioning, he provided testimony that he acted on the instructions of the Ukrainian special services," said the statement, read by a woman in uniform.
Russia's Foreign Ministry, in a statement on its website said: "Responsibility for this and other terrorist acts lies not only with Ukrainian authorities, but also their Western patrons, the United States in the first instance."
It said Washington's failure to denounce this and other attacks was "self-revealing" for the US administration.
State news agency TASS quoted security sources as saying the suspect was a "native of Ukraine" with a past conviction for robbery with violence.
Mykhailo Podolyak, a senior adviser to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, said he believed Russian authorities had staged the attack.
"Everyone understands that this is all a staged performance," Mr Podolyak told Ukrainian television.
"This is staged and the bombings at the Kremlin are aimed at domestic audiences."
The novelist was the third prominent pro-war figure to be targeted by a bomb since Moscow's full-scale invasion of its neighbour in February 2022.
Russia has blamed Ukraine for the deaths of journalist Darya Dugina and war blogger Vladlen Tatarsky in the two previous attacks, and Kyiv has denied involvement.
Ukrainian news site UNIAN ran an online poll asking readers who "in the pantheon of Russian scum propagandists" should be targeted next after Dugina, Tatarsky and Mr Prilepin.
Officials at the White House, Pentagon and State Department did not immediately respond to requests for comment. No comment was immediately available from Britain's Foreign Office.
ABC/wires
No comments:
Post a Comment