Extract from ABC News
Analysis
China has been underpricing rare earths for decades. (Reuters: Stringer)
The Australian rare earths projects capturing US attention.
From refining to production
Could Australia take the next step and produce magnets, instead of leaving it to the US and Korea?
Probably not. Darryl Cuzzubbo, the CEO of Arafura, told me last week that while there's nothing to stop Australia from making magnets, "I just don't see it as likely". The existing suppliers of parts to car manufacturers will do it.
But Cuzzubbo went on: "Where Australia could play a role is processing to an oxide [which] represents 95 per cent of the value chain of getting to a rare earths metal.
"The second role Australia can play — and you would have noted Australia's talk about strategic reserve — [is] where they basically guarantee supply to their trading partners, which is a bit of a bargaining chip for Australia."
Arafura's refinery is three years from completion and five years from full production. Iluka's is closer because construction has started, but the resource life is relatively short because they're using a pile of tailings.
China's bargaining chip
Apart from Trump's understandable promiscuity with other potential suppliers, there's the matter of whether China will always be a problem.
As the 1973 oil embargo stretched into 1974, and at the same time as president Richard Nixon threatened the Saudis with military strikes, US officials were working behind the scenes to repair relations and get a deal done.
The Saudis were suddenly very rich and were keen on buying a lot of American military technology. America, in return, was happy to sell it to them.
In the 1975 fiscal year, they signed $2 billion worth of military contracts, and importantly, Saudi Arabia agreed to price oil in US dollars, and to invest the money back into US bonds.
Trump met with China's president, Xi Jinping, at the APEC summit last month in Korea and came out extravagantly praising him and, importantly, with a 12-month pause on the rare earths embargo.
But that doesn't mean it's over. China is not Saudi Arabia and certainly doesn't need American military equipment. It only needs semiconductors, and not for long.
And it will only have leverage over magnet production for a few years — as long as it takes for the four of five rare earths mines and refineries that America is now supporting to get built.
And as Cuzzubbo told me: "China set themselves up to pull this card, but you can only pull it once, right?
"Because as soon as you pull it, then you've just motivated these other global manufacturing powerhouses to solve the problem and that's what they've done. They've pulled it, but they can only pull it once. They're going to get maximum leverage. Until the US and other countries have got an independent supply, which I'm going to say is some years away,
"China's still got a bargaining chip that they're going to use to the maximum effect."
What that means, exactly, we'll have to wait and see, but it's unlikely to mean smooth sailing.
Alan Kohler is finance presenter and columnist on ABC News and he also writes for Intelligent Investor.
No comments:
Post a Comment