Wednesday, 31 October 2018

How wounds heal and why it takes longer as you get older

Extract from ABC News


In the split second after I tripped while out running on the weekend, I knew I was going to do an excellent job of skinning my knee.
And I did. I skidded down the gravelly track, sprawled on my belly, coming to a stop a couple of metres from the tree root that I had failed to see in time.
As predicted, blood started oozing from a scrape about the size of a 50 cent coin at the top of my kneecap.
But within a couple of minutes, it had already started to seal off. And as I trotted back to the car, I thought: what's going on underneath my scab?
And will it heal as quickly as all those skinned knees I had as a kid?

Time (usually) heals all wounds

The job of the skin is to close a wound as quickly as it can to prevent infection, but that comes with the expense of getting a scar, said Zlatko Kopecki, a wound repair biologist at the University of South Australia.
"Something like a graze on your knee would be an acute wound and go through the four stages of wound healing," he said.
The first stage, called haemostasis, is to stop you from losing too much blood. Special sticky blood cells called platelets bunch together to create a plug.
"Bleeding should stop in about eight minutes, depending on the size of the wound," Dr Kopecki said.
Hot on the heels is the next healing phase: inflammation.
Skin cells secrete tiny proteins called cytokines, which attract the body's clean-up crew: white blood cells called neutrophils and macrophages.
They tidy up the wounded patch and help fight infection by eating pathogens, dead cells and other debris that might get in the way of the healing process.
Dr Kopecki said the inflammatory phase can continue for up to three days.
If inflammation doesn't subside, that's when the injury becomes a chronic wound.
Next up is proliferation. At this point, cells called fibroblasts occupy the wound and construct tissue, including collagen fibres, which give skin its elasticity and structure.
If you've ever wondered why scrapes and sores tend to heal inwards from the edges, it's because fibroblasts divide from the healthy skin at a wound's fringes, then travel beneath the scab towards the centre, leaving collagen-rich scar tissue in their wake, Dr Kopecki said.
And as the scab lifts, it begins to itch. And while it's tempting to have a bit of a scratch or pick at the scab at this point: don't.
If the wound starts bleeding again, you're back to square one.
"The best thing you can do is moisturise," Dr Kopecki said.
Finally, we get to remodelling, the longest of the phases, which can take months.
This is when the body rearranges collagen fibres, which were laid down quickly and haphazardly during the proliferation phase to create scar tissue.
During remodelling, the fibres end up lying parallel to each other and the scar flattens.
This parallel arrangement is the reason scar tissue is only around 80 per cent the tensile strength of healthy skin, Dr Kopecki said. Collagen in unbroken skin is laid down in a much stronger basket weave pattern.
Some people end up with bulging scar tissue, called keloid scars.
"They're completely benign. All it means is in the remodelling phase, a wound doesn't get the signal to stop secreting collagen, so you end up with a big scar," Dr Kopecki said.
There's evidence that gels containing silicone can help here, he added.
"Silicone regulates fibroblast production, so you get a softer and flatter scar."
Massaging scars can help minimise them too.

How well you repair can depend on your age

It might seem like we have tissue repair all worked out, but there are still plenty of questions that need solving, Queensland University of Technology wound repair biologist Tony Parker said.
"You can think of understanding wound healing as like a big jigsaw. We can see the overall picture, but there's a whole bunch of pieces missing," he said.
For instance, the function of the scab itself has researchers scratching their head.
Its obvious role is to protect against infection. But the formation of a dry scab might not be the best way for a wound to heal.
They typically repair better if they're covered with a dressing and kept moist.
"It's full of proteins and how it functions, we don't know. We're still working out parts of the fine molecular detail."
If you think you don't heal as quickly as you did when you were a kid, there's probably something in that too, according to Dr Parker.
"Kids do heal faster," he said. "Cell replication and proliferation don't occur as well in older people compared to young cells."
The reasons for this aren't fully understood either, but the fact that a child's skin needs to keep up with their development probably has something to do with it.
"Very, very young children, like toddlers or infants, are rapidly growing and expanding as they grow, so their skin grows with them, whereas adults don't increase their surface area all that much," Dr Parker said.
"So while they do heal, the healing process seems to slow down in older adults."
In much older people, wound healing can be a real problem. As we age, our skin becomes thinner, almost papery, and tears more easily.
On top of that, there's just not enough tissue to get the healing ball rolling quickly. Throw in poor circulation, and acute wounds can become chronic, sometimes lasting decades.
At the other end of the age spectrum, foetuses up to the third trimester are able to heal not by repair, but by regeneration.
So instead of ending up with scar tissue, a wound will heal to include sweat glands and hair follicles, Dr Kopecki said.
"We're trying to understand how we can develop therapies which will move from repair to regeneration," he said.

The Guardian view on Donald Trump: using hate as bait

Extract from The Guardian

The US president is following a consistent strategy of creating crises over immigration and race to mobilise white support for Republicans in the midterm elections


Donald Trump is still sometimes depicted as impulsive and unpredictable. But this view is mistaken. There is method – albeit an evil method – in his madness. His behaviour in the build-up to next week’s US midterm elections highlights this side of the president. He has been consistent and unscrupulous in pursuing it. Fearing that voters will elect an anti-Trump Congress on 6 November, he has made a clear choice to use hate and division to bait and provoke his opponents into a backlash which, he hopes, will energise white voters to support Republican candidates at the polls.
At least three of Mr Trump’s actions this week can only be adequately explained by this strategy. In the first, he has ordered 5,200 active duty American troops to the US-Mexico border. The objective here is not to respond to a crisis – several thousand National Guard are already there, as well as border police – but to create one. Mr Trump wants to make a show of force against a caravan of migrants from Central America, which he has mischievously described as an invasion and which he has falsely said contains “unknown Middle Easterners”. Not only is this claim untrue, but the caravan itself is daily shrinking in size and it is still in southern Mexico, weeks away from reaching the US border. Mr Trump is using his nation’s troops as partisan political props.
The second example of Mr Trump’s cynicism is his response to the slaughter of 11 Jews in Pittsburgh’s Tree of Life synagogue. On Tuesday, as the first dead from the synagogue gun massacre were being buried, Mr Trump was preparing to visit Pittsburgh in the teeth of widespread opposition. Many families of the victims, along with Pittsburgh’s mayor, asked the president to stay away. Pennsylvania’s two US senators, and congressional leaders of both parties, chose not to accompany Mr Trump. But he was undeterred. He preferred to barge in and grandstand on a day of private grief. Why behave this way? Not because he is a national uniter, as other presidents have tried to be at such moments, but because he is a divider and a provoker.
This week’s third determination to create a crisis and to use it to frighten white voters to the polls came in an interview released on Monday. Mr Trump has chosen this moment to try to end the right to American citizenship of babies born in the United States to non-citizens. Mr Trump is himself the son of an immigrant mother, the US constitution has recognised this birthright for over 150 years, and it is doubtful he could simply order the change as he pretends. But the president could not be clearer about his darker intentions. He is determined to do everything to make immigration – and that means race – the explicit centrepiece of these elections.
Everything Mr Trump will say over the next seven days will be dedicated to this hate-filled strategy. Even the exceptions prove the rule. After Christine Blasey Ford alleged that Brett Kavanaugh had sexually assaulted her, Mr Trump called her a credible witness. Days later, he mercilessly mocked her at a political rally. Now the same pattern has been repeated after pipe bombs were sent to Democratic politicians. Mr Trump initially condemned the attacks as despicable. A day later he complained that “this ‘bomb’ stuff” had got in the way of Republican mobilisation. The true Trump does not hide for long.
Mr Trump is consistent, not inconsistent. He seeks to be the president of some of the people, not all of them. A man who hates half of his country has no right to call for a unity that he does not believe in and which, in a heartbeat, he is ready to trash and mock.

Tuesday, 30 October 2018

Humanity has wiped out 60% of animals since 1970, major report finds

Extract from The Guardian

The huge loss is a tragedy in itself but also threatens the survival of civilisation, say the world’s leading scientists

Cattle in the Amazon rainforest.
Cattle in the Amazon rainforest. 
Photograph: Michael Nichols/National Geographic/Getty Images

Humanity has wiped out 60% of mammals, birds, fish and reptiles since 1970, leading the world’s foremost experts to warn that the annihilation of wildlife is now an emergency that threatens civilisation.
The new estimate of the massacre of wildlife is made in a major report produced by WWF and involving 59 scientists from across the globe. It finds that the vast and growing consumption of food and resources by the global population is destroying the web of life, billions of years in the making, upon which human society ultimately depends for clean air, water and everything else.
“We are sleepwalking towards the edge of a cliff” said Mike Barrett, executive director of science and conservation at WWF. “If there was a 60% decline in the human population, that would be equivalent to emptying North America, South America, Africa, Europe, China and Oceania. That is the scale of what we have done.”
“This is far more than just being about losing the wonders of nature, desperately sad though that is,” he said. “This is actually now jeopardising the future of people. Nature is not a ‘nice to have’ – it is our life-support system.”
“We are rapidly running out of time,” said Prof Johan Rockström, a global sustainability expert at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany. “Only by addressing both ecosystems and climate do we stand a chance of safeguarding a stable planet for humanity’s future on Earth.”
Many scientists believe the world has begun a sixth mass extinction, the first to be caused by a species – Homo sapiens. Other recent analyses have revealed that humankind has destroyed 83% of all mammals and half of plants since the dawn of civilisation and that, even if the destruction were to end now, it would take 5-7 million years for the natural world to recover.
The Living Planet Index, produced for WWF by the Zoological Society of London, uses data on 16,704 populations of mammals, birds, fish, reptiles and amphibians, representing more than 4,000 species, to track the decline of wildlife. Between 1970 and 2014, the latest data available, populations fell by an average of 60%. Four years ago, the decline was 52%. The “shocking truth”, said Barrett, is that the wildlife crash is continuing unabated.
Wildlife and the ecosystems are vital to human life, said Prof Bob Watson, one of the world’s most eminent environmental scientists and currently chair of an intergovernmental panel on biodiversity that said in March that the destruction of nature is as dangerous as climate change.
“Nature contributes to human wellbeing culturally and spiritually, as well as through the critical production of food, clean water, and energy, and through regulating the Earth’s climate, pollution, pollination and floods,” he said. “The Living Planet report clearly demonstrates that human activities are destroying nature at an unacceptable rate, threatening the wellbeing of current and future generations.”
The biggest cause of wildlife losses is the destruction of natural habitats, much of it to create farmland. Three-quarters of all land on Earth is now significantly affected by human activities. Killing for food is the next biggest cause – 300 mammal species are being eaten into extinction – while the oceans are massively overfished, with more than half now being industrially fished.

Chemical pollution is also significant: half the world’s killer whale populations are now doomed to die from PCB contamination. Global trade introduces invasive species and disease, with amphibians decimated by a fungal disease thought to be spread by the pet trade.
The worst affected region is South and Central America, which has seen an 89% drop in vertebrate populations, largely driven by the felling of vast areas of wildlife-rich forest. In the tropical savannah called cerrado, an area the size of Greater London is cleared every two months, said Barrett.
“It is a classic example of where the disappearance is the result of our own consumption, because the deforestation is being driven by ever expanding agriculture producing soy, which is being exported to countries including the UK to feed pigs and chickens,” he said. The UK itself has lost much of its wildlife, ranking 189th for biodiversity loss out of 218 nations in 2016.
The habitats suffering the greatest damage are rivers and lakes, where wildlife populations have fallen 83%, due to the enormous thirst of agriculture and the large number of dams. “Again there is this direct link between the food system and the depletion of wildlife,” said Barrett. Eating less meat is an essential part of reversing losses, he said.
The Living Planet Index has been criticised as being too broad a measure of wildlife losses and smoothing over crucial details. But all indicators, from extinction rates to intactness of ecosystems, show colossal losses. “They all tell you the same story,” said Barrett.
Conservation efforts can work, with tiger numbers having risen 20% in India in six years as habitat is protected. Giant pandas in China and otters in the UK have also been doing well.
But Marco Lambertini, director general of WWF International, said the fundamental issue was consumption: “We can no longer ignore the impact of current unsustainable production models and wasteful lifestyles.”
The world’s nations are working towards a crunch meeting of the UN’s Convention on Biological Diversity in 2020, when new commitments for the protection of nature will be made. “We need a new global deal for nature and people and we have this narrow window of less than two years to get it,” said Barrett. “This really is the last chance. We have to get it right this time.”

Tanya Steele, chief executive at WWF, said: “We are the first generation to know we are destroying our planet and the last one that can do anything about it.”

'We've never seen this': massive Canadian glaciers shrinking rapidly

Extract from The Guardian

Glaciers in the Yukon territory are retreating even faster than expected in a warming climate, scientists warn

Scientists in Canada have warned that massive glaciers in the Yukon territory are shrinking even faster than would be expected from a warming climate – and bringing dramatic changes to the region.
After a string of recent reports chronicling the demise of the ice fields, researchers hope that greater awareness will help the public better understand the rapid pace of climate change.
The rate of warming in the north is double that of the average global temperature increase, concluded the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in its annual Arctic Report Card, which called the warming “unprecedented”.
“The region is one of the hotspots for warming, which is something we’ve come to realize over the last 15 years,” said David Hik of Simon Fraser University. “The magnitude of the changes is dramatic.”
In their recent State of the Mountains report published earlier in the summer, the Canadian Alpine Club found that the Saint Elias mountains – which span British Columbia, the Yukon and Alaska – are losing ice faster than the rest of the country.
Previous research found that between 1957 and 2007, the range lost 22% of its ice cover, enough to raise global seal levels by 1.1 millimetres.
“When I first went to the St Elias range, it felt like time travel – into the past,” said Hik, who co-edited the report. “What we’re seeing now feels like time travel into the future. Because as the massive glaciers are retreating, they’re causing a complete reorganization of the environment.”
The accelerating melt of the glacier has resulted in major shifts to water sources at lower elevations.
In 2016, the meltwaters of the glacier shifted dramatically away from the Slims river, cutting off critical water supplies to Kluane Lake – a Unesco world heritage site. Since the diversion, water levels at the lake have dropped more than 6.6ft – stranding thousands of fish from their natural spawning rivers.
Dust storms have begun to flare up along sections of the well-travelled Alaska Highway – at times halting traffic, the result of a dry river bed covered in glacial silt. The events at Kluane Lake are a precursor of what can be expected elsewhere, said Hik.
The dramatic changes to the landscape come amid predictions that the Arctic region is slated to experience far quicker – and potentially devastating –warming in the coming years.
“We’re seeing a 20% difference in area coverage of the glaciers in Kluane national park and reserve and the rest of the Unesco world heritage site [over a 60-year period],” Diane Wilson, a field unit superintendent at Parks Canada, told the CBC. “We’ve never seen that. It’s outside the scope of normal.”
In the St Elias range, researchers have found warming intensifies at higher altitudes – a phenomenon they are not quite able to explain.
“These types of events aren’t isolated to glacial events in the St Elias,” said Zac Robinson, the report’s co-author and professor at the University of Alberta. “We’re slated to lose 80% of the ice cover in the Rocky Mountains over the next 50 years.”
Earlier this year, Canada’s auditor general found that none of the three northern territories were adequately prepared for the impacts of climate change.
But Robinson and Hik cautioned against an overly pessimistic view of the rapidly changing ecosystem.
“Never before in human history have mountains been revered as they are today. Mountains are landscapes people adore – and with awareness, real change can be affected,” said Robinson.

“When we have a an opportunity for early warning, we might as well take it,” said Hik.

Another 800 Centrelink jobs to be outsourced as millions of calls go unanswered

Extract from The Guardian

Human services minister says outsourcing is working but refuses to release report

About 800 Centrelink call centre jobs will be outsourced in Brisbane as new figures show 48m calls to the agency went unanswered last financial year.
Announcing the move on Tuesday the human services minister, Michael Keenan, cited a report by accounting firm KPMG that the government says found outsourced staff performed better than full-time public servants. The government refused to release the report.
The 800 jobs in Brisbane have been contracted to Concentrix Services and bring the total number of outsourced call centre staff to 2,750.
It was revealed in Senate estimates hearings last week that Centrelink had again failed to meet its customer satisfaction targets, with complaints rising.
The 47.9m unanswered calls were an improvement on the previous year’s figure – 55m – but the Department of Human Services (DHS) conceded there was still room for improvement.
The average waiting time for a Centrelink call was 15 minutes and 58 seconds, but longer for those calling about youth allowance and Austudy (37-minute wait on average) or employment services (34 minutes).
Initial data for 2018-19 suggests the number of unanswered calls and waiting times have fallen. However, callers can now use an automated function to complete some activities, though a “congestion message system”. “As a result of the congestion message trial there are no busy signals recorded for the employment services main business line,” a DHS report shows.
Centrelink complaints, meanwhile, increased in 2017-18 to 270,000, up by 68,000.
The government responded to the rising number of unanswered calls last year by announcing trials to outsource Centrelink call centre work to Serco, DataCom Connect, Concentrix Services and Stellar Asia Pacific.
Last year 250 Centrelink jobs were contracted out to Serco as past of a $51m trial, infuriating the public sector union. The program was expanded in April to include another 1,000 call centre workers.
On Tuesday, the government claimed a review of the Serco pilot found the outsourced workers “answered more calls each day, had less down time between calls, were cost effective and ranked equally for customer satisfaction”.
“This dispels many of the myths perpetuated by Labor that outsourcing leads to higher cost and reduced standards of service,” Keenan said.
But the Coalition has refused to release the report, which it says is a “cabinet document”.
The opposition’s human services spokesman, Ed Husic, said the report was a “desperate attempt to convince the public about the value of privatised labour”
“Not surprisingly the government refuses to release the report to see if the claim stacks up against reality,” he said.
The Greens called for the report to be released.
“I’m very concerned about the details reported from the ‘secret’ report and the rights and conditions of the people employed by the labour hire companies,” said Greens senator Rachel Siewert.
Labor has also warned the outsourcing has led to “compromised service delivery, insecure working arrangements, lower wages, reduced conditions and poorer quality training”.
Pas Forgione, coordinator of welfare rights group the Anti-Poverty Network, said Centrelink call centres were “not like a phone company or a power company”.

“This is someone’s sole income. You can’t take any chances.”

Carole King on songwriting in the age of Trump: 'I am the honest opposition'

Extract from The Guardian

The songwriter has been drawn out of semi-retirement, rewriting her song One to try to persuade voters to ‘take us away from the terrible direction America is going in’
At her home in rural Idaho, Carole King is having some difficulty saying the president’s name. “Trump,” she manages eventually, her accent still pure Brooklyn half a century after she left New York and became the biggest-selling female solo artist of the early 70s. “I don’t even like using his name,” she says. “Let’s not use his name. Let’s just say ‘the leader of my country’ instead.”
King keeps a low media profile that speaks more of a self-effacing personality than suspicion or reclusiveness. As reviews of her 2012 autobiography, A Natural Woman, pointed out, she has a tendency to play down her vast success, barely mentioning in the book that her 1971 album Tapestry sold 25m copies, and summarising the astonishing run of 1960s hits she wrote with her then-husband, the late Gerry Goffin – The Loco-Motion, Will You Still Love Me Tomorrow?, Up on the Roof, (You Make Me Feel Like) A Natural Woman – with the line: “We continued to write enough songs to pay our mortgage.”
Carole King: One (2018 version) – video
She is giving an interview today because she has a new song to promote. Or rather, “a variation of an old song”. She has rewritten the final verse of One – the closing track from 1977’s Simple Things, the last of her big-selling 70s albums – in the hope of galvanising people to the polls in the US’s forthcoming midterm elections. The original’s vaguely hippy-ish lines about being “part of the energy it takes to serve each other” are now sharpened into calls to “come together as one / Show them how it’s done / At the end of the day, we’ll be able to say: ‘Love won’”.
With a songwriter’s precise command of language, King doesn’t like my suggestion that she has made it more strident. “It is definitely a call to action,” she demurs. “Strident can suggest someone really pushing forward with an idea, and I’m not really pushing forward with the idea – I’m releasing it to the people, for the people to hear.”

King performing Tapestry in London’s Hyde Park – her first UK concert in 27 years – 3 July 2016.
King performing Tapestry in London’s Hyde Park – her first UK concert in 27 years – 3 July 2016. Photograph: Samir Hussein/Redferns
Strident or not, old or new, the fact that King has been recording comes as a surprise. Now 76, she has long toyed with retirement. In 2010, she said that her tour with fellow singer-songwriter James Taylor was “a lovely way to go out”, before changing her mind, releasing a Grammy-nominated Christmas album and performing Tapestry in full at an acclaimed show in London in 2016. Even 18 months ago, she told an interviewer that she was no longer interested in writing songs. Indeed, she says she has spent recent years concentrating on a novel. “It’s the same thing that sends the music through me – it came through me in You’ve Got a Friend, comes through me in every song I write. I can feel it now, it’s the same energy, but apparently it wants me to write a novel, so I’m writing a novel.”
But she doesn’t discount the idea of writing songs again, as long as she has the motivation. Certainly, when the idea of rewriting One presented itself – initially to perform as the opening act at “a women’s power luncheon” for nine female candidates for the US House of Representatives – she was drawn to the piano “like pins to a magnet”.
“I don’t choose to turn [songwriting] off,” she says. “It just wasn’t coming. I felt like I had nothing new to say.” With this event, she realised she did. “I basically already said it in the song once, but some of it wasn’t relevant to the situation today. I wanted to add power to the ending.” She corrects herself: “Empowerment, not power. Empowerment is what I’m about right now.”
She decided to record it in mid-October, at the same studio in which she recorded Tapestry (the A&M Recording Studio B, now renamed Henson, after the company behind the Muppets bought it in 2000). “I just felt that you hear so many times people saying: ‘Why should I bother to vote – my vote doesn’t make a difference, why should I bother to do this or that?’ It bears on the election because it’s about people who value acting in a spirit of love and compassion and caring for our neighbours – our immediate neighbours and our neighbours around the world – coming together to find what we have in common rather than the division that is going on.”
She returns to Trump. “The leader of our country is using rhetoric that is encouraging people to bring out their fear and hatred and violence, and I really feel we must do something to stop that, and I believe the Democratic party in our country is our hope for this now, because the Republican party is pretty much rubber-stamping – or if they’re not rubber-stamping, they’re saying nothing, which makes them, in my view, complicit in stirring up the worst emotions, in promoting lies: outright, provable lies. I think the Democratic party is our hope to take us away from the terrible direction that America is going in. That does not make me unpatriotic or disloyal. I’m the honest opposition and I support the honest opposition to what the government in my country is standing for today.”

King performing in New York, 1976.
King performing in New York, 1976. Photograph: Richard E Aaron/Redferns

She says being back in the same studio and seated at the same piano that Tapestry was recorded on was “magical”. She has often talked about how immature she was when she made that album, which seems strange, partly because she was a divorced 29-year-old mother of two, and partly because Tapestry’s blockbusting success was partly due to it being among the first major rock albums to speak to a female audience in a mature voice.

But there is also a sense in which it fixed King in people’s minds as the figure on the album’s cover: a mild-mannered, folksy writer whose concerns lay more with the personal than the political. It’s a perception she seems keen to dispel. “I got involved through advocating for the environment and half my life became political, really. People know, but they don’t know how much time I’ve spent on Capitol Hill, working with politicians and that whole world. It’s what my novel’s about. And now, to have this song come out, it is part of who I am.”

Morrison brushes off Turnbull’s advice against moving Australia’s Israel embassy

Extract from The Guardian

Scott Morrison has insisted that any decision Australia makes about shifting its embassy in Israel will be in the national interest, not with an eye to placating allies, after Malcolm Turnbull highlighted Indonesia’s concerns about the move.
Turnbull late on Monday implicitly warned his successor against following through with the controversial foreign policy shift Morrison telegraphed in the run-up to the Wentworth byelection, after the former prime minister met with the Indonesian president on Monday.
He met Joko Widodo as part of an Australian delegation attending a global conference. After their conversation Turnbull said Jokowi had expressed “serious concern” about the proposal to shift Australia’s embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.
“There is no question, were that move to occur, it would be met with a very negative reaction in Indonesia,” he said. “This is after all the largest Muslim-majority country in the world.”
Shifting the embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem would mimic Donald Trump’s policy in the Middle East. After Trump telegraphed the US position Turnbull contemplated whether Australia should follow suit, and dismissed the idea partly out of concern that the move would spark a significant diplomatic backlash in Jakarta.
Morrison brushed off the public advice from the former prime minister in Canberra on Monday morning. Declaring Australia was a sovereign nation, Morrison said the determining factor in the decision would be Australia’s national interest.
“Australia will always make our decisions on our foreign policy based on our interests and will do that as a sovereign nation,” Morrison told reporters.
“We will listen to others but Australia will always make decisions about our foreign policy on our terms and in our interests. I have always put our interests first and that is how the decision will be made.”
He said a final decision on the policy had not yet been made by the government, and he said “proper process” would be followed: “But let me stress, Australia decides what our foreign policy is and only Australia.”
Morrison floated the idea of shifting the embassy in the dying days of the Wentworth byelection campaign, provoking reactions within the Jewish community varying between delight and cynicism.
Rabbi Levi Wolff, from the Orthodox Central Synagogue in Bondi, congratulated the Australian government for being open to the idea, saying it was a simple statement that Israel – the only free democracy in the Middle East – has the freedom to choose where it wants its capital.
But Vivienne Porzsolt, from Jews Against the Occupation, said it was an insult to the Jewish community which encompassed a much broader range of views than that reflected “in the pronouncements of the Jewish leadership in lockstep with the state of Israel”.
More than 12% of voters in the Wentworth electorate are Jewish. The Liberals lost the seat to the high-profile independent, Kerryn Phelps.
Turnbull’s appearance at the Our Ocean conference in Bali this week was not without controversy, but his close relationship with Jokowi, whom he referred to as his “good friend”, was seen as useful in repairing relations with Australia’s northern neighbour.
The pair met for 40 minutes and discussed the embassy issue as well as an upcoming bilateral trade deal between Australian and Indonesia, which the government feared may have been under threat.
Turnbull said Jokowi had “expressed to me, as he has done to prime minister Morrison, the very serious concern held in Indonesia about the prospect of the Australian embassy in Israel being moved from Tel Aviv to ­Jerusalem”.
He also said he was confident that the Indonesia Australia comprehensive economic partnership agreement – which has taken eight years of negotiation – would be signed within weeks.
“I have no reason to believe it won’t,” he said. “Of course, it then has to be ratified through the Indonesian parliamentary system in the normal way.”

I returned to my prison on Manus Island and was stunned by what I saw

Extract from The Guardian

Recently I met someone who I have not seen for a very long time. I was first introduced to this individual in a faraway and distant past, during the first few months after being exiled to Manus prison.
Nicole Judge is an Australian woman who worked as a case manager in Manus prison five years ago. However, after Reza Barati was killed in February 2014 she quit her job and spoke out against Australia’s brutal policy of exiling innocent refugees to Manus and Nauru; she became a human rights advocate. She has been active in this cause ever since.
After five years she returned to Manus to meet the people still suffering, together with Ian Rintoul as a member of the Refugee Action Coalition. Nicole mainly worked as a case manager in Mike camp, and I remember how she would enter the camp together with other case managers to talk to their designated clients. Now she was back here.
It was a hot afternoon when I boarded a boat with Nicole, Ian, a refugee named Adam Aziz and some local Manusians to visit the former prison where we were incarcerated for four and a half years before we were forcibly evicted and transferred to new prison camps in November.
It took 30 minutes to reach the former prison. After passing a few small islands we arrived at the shore – the same spot that for years we used to stare at from behind the fences. When we disembarked from the boat and walked past the beach, we were stunned by what we saw.

Former Manus detention centre, September 2018.
Former Manus detention centre, September 2018. Photograph: Behrouz Boochani


"We looked back at the site that was once a place for torture and captivity for hundreds of individuals"

The location of the medical centre where people stood waiting for hours in queues to obtain pills was now flattened. And they had destroyed the tents covering the dining areas where day after day the ruckus and commotion of suffering human beings reverberated.
Nicole was shocked; she tried to recall the places she had left behind years ago. She circled the abandoned site which was now replaced with vivid, luscious plants and vegetation. We all went in different directions and tried to recollect something of those bitter memories and find some semblance of the past. But there was nothing there.
I could only identify the trees, and I also found a toothbrush and a pair of flip flops buried in the dirt.
I asked Nicole how she felt. She replied: “I was really nervous initially to go back to the Lombrum campsite. I was not sure how I would feel. When I saw the campsite again I felt overcome with different memories, all flooding back at once.”

Behrouz Boochani and Nicole Judge.
Behrouz Boochani and Nicole Judge. Photograph: Behrouz Boochani

She shared one of her memories with me. When she witnessed instances of suicide and self-harm she would immediately go to the Salvation Army office to notify them. During those times they were warned about talking to the media; they were told not to talk to any journalist or media organisation about the situation in the Manus prison camp. Nicole reflected on her feelings at the time: “I remembered the warning we received about speaking out and what would happen to staff if we did. The strongest memory I had was a feeling of desperation, helplessness to do something about what I had seen while I was working there. I had the hopeless realisation that there was nothing I could do to help.”
This is precisely what I experienced as a prisoner during these years. The system has been designed in such a way that anyone working there cannot help anyone else in any way at all. The system completely controls every employee, and it is for this very reason that people like Nicole who are committed to moral principles cannot continue working in these prison camps. They either quit their jobs or the system realises their ethical practices and fires them. No one with a moral disposition can withstand working in this system for a long time. They either have to quit or tolerate the ruthlessness of the system. Nicole said: “We were told by our management not to give hope to the men detained on Manus. How could I successfully talk someone out of suicide and not give them hope? I wasn’t allowed to discuss politics, policy, opinion, or hope at all.”
This is what we prisoners have always known in visceral and profound ways; that is, the system has been designed to annihilate the refugees psychologically and emotionally and to ensure they do not feel like human beings. The result of this is that the refugees return to the country from which they fled.
Referencing the nature that had re-established itself on the site of the prison camp, Nicole displayed a bitter smile and said: “When you hide people away on islands and tell workers not to talk about what happens you create the perfect environment for abuse. Everyone who worked there has to question whether they participated in abuse or whether they did anything about it.”
For me and other refugees Nicole is a symbol of humanitarianism and dignity. She represents people for whom principles of humanity have genuine personal and social worth.
During that day one question continuously crossed my mind: How can the designers and organisers of Manus prison think that by razing the prison they can eliminate the remnants of the crimes they committed? Do they think that people will not find out about all this in the future?
When we boarded the boat again to return to Lorengau after an hour, we looked back at the site that was once a place for torture and captivity for hundreds of individuals. The boat slowly and calmly drifted away from the shore of human bondage. Manus prison disappeared within a deep jungle. But Nicole summed it up: “They have destroyed the physical Manus prison, but those who have been sacrificed by this system are still living. As long as we are alive the history of this prison continues. No matter how Australia has tried to silence the voices of the individuals still in purgatory in the new camps, the atrocities have only been transferred 35 kilometres away to three scattered prisons.”
Behrouz Boochani is a journalist and an Iranian refugee held on Manus Island. Translated by Omid Tofighian from the American University in Cairo/University of Sydney

Comments on this article have been pre-moderated to ensure the discussion is on the topics that have been written about in the article