Extract from The Guardian
The opposition knows the prime minister has almost
certainly done nothing wrong, but it is hoping voters will decide he
is ‘not one of us’
Labor is trying to paint Malcolm Turnbull as out
of touch with mainstream Australia. Photograph: Peter Parks/AFP/Getty
Images
Contact author
Wednesday 14 October 2015 18.15 AEDT
Labor knows Malcolm Turnbull is very unlikely to
have avoided Australian tax on
his considerable investments. Having waited so long to win the
prime ministership he would surely have guaranteed he didn’t come
unstuck because of something as obvious as that.
But proving tax avoidance is almost certainly not
the point.
Labor’s aim is to paint the new prime minister
as not “one of us”, someone who thinks he’s better, someone
who’s out of touch. Not to attack him directly for being rich, of
course – Australians quite like someone who’s made their own pile
– but to attack him for not seeing the world in the way a person
with an ordinary bank account and an ATM card does.
That’s why, when Turnbull announced he would
continue to live in his own Point Piper mansion when in Sydney,
rather than the official prime ministerial residence, Kirribilli
House, Labor strategists were delighted.
No matter that Kirribilli House would still be
used for official and charity functions, or that the decision
probably saved the taxpayers money. It looked like Turnbull thought
Kirribilli House wasn’t good enough for him, they said. It
reinforced the point that this was a bloke with his own, superior,
waterfront pad.
To a lesser extent and a slightly different
audience, Turnbull’s insistence that he would continue to use
a private email server for non-classified communications served
the same purpose. The arguments about security and transparency were
not the political point. The message, Labor said, was simply that
this was a bloke who thought the rules didn’t apply to him.
And so, inevitably, the debate has moved to
Turnbull’s private wealth. His investments have been thoroughly
scrutinised. Even Labor senator Sam Dastyari, who first raised the
claims in the Senate, says they are legal and fully and properly
disclosed.
But some of Turnbull’s wealth is in three
investment funds registered in the Cayman Islands. Turnbull has
argued for many months that he invested in the funds in order to
avoid all possibility of conflict of interest and that he and his
wife pay Australian tax, in full. Labor has produced nothing to
disprove this.
It is asking why Turnbull chose managed funds
registered in the Caymans – a known tax haven and tax secrecy
jurisdiction. It is asking what the funds do, and whether they pay
corporate tax. And it is pointing to the Coalition’s highly
questionable move to take private individuals out of new domestic tax
transparency laws.
By day’s end the Coalition was pointing out that
Labor MPs, including Bill Shorten, have their money in super funds
that also have investments that are domiciled in the Caymans.
But tactically Labor is betting more people will
remember that Turnbull’s riches are stashed in an opaque tax haven
in the Caribbean.
They calculate that Turnbull’s frustration at
shadow ministers’ “inability to understand the way in which these
funds operate” just plays into the their hands. Because most
Australians wouldn’t.
No comments:
Post a Comment