Friday 31 January 2020

When will they listen? A school striker's lament

Extract from Eureka Street

  • Gracie Ryan
  • 28 January 2020                               

On 20 September 2019, an estimated 300,000 students attended the many 'School Strike 4 Climate' protests across Australia. According to the ABC, the protestors called for the federal government to commit to powering Australia entirely by renewable energy sources by 2030, stop providing federal funding for coal and oil projects, and ensure 'a just transition and job creation for all fossil fuel industry workers and communities'.

Main image: Protestors holding placards look on on 20 September 2019 at the climate strike in Melbourne. (Photo by Asanka Ratnayake/Getty Images)Among the bustle of hundreds of thousands of teenagers with clever signs, mild sunburns, and a palpable disdain for major party politics, there was a burning sense that we could change the world. The noise we made felt so deafening that no one could ignore it.
And then we were promptly ignored.
In response to the demands made by the protestors, Prime Minister Scott Morrison simply said in a session of parliament on 26 November, 'What we want is more learning in schools and less activism in schools.'
On the 26th of August 2019, New South Wales Premier Gladys Berejiklian appeared on QandA on a special episode where the panel and audience were made up of NSW high school students. Berejiklian was asked how she felt about students striking to demand action on climate change. The premier stated that she 'encourage[s] protest, but outside of school hours. I think you should protest on school grounds ... I think there are so many creative ways to get your point across.'
On 20 December 2019, the Australian bushfires began in rural New South Wales. At present, this fire has killed 27 people, including firefighters and volunteers, destroyed over 2000 homes, and has burned 11.2 million hectares of bushland. In response to the fires, the Australian chapter of 'Extinction Rebellion' organised a number of protests all around the country, challenging the government's lack of action on climate change. A review of 57 scientific papers published since 2013, done by Britain's Met Office Hadley Centre found that climate change has led to an increase in the frequency and severity of periods with a high fire risk, due to a combination of high temperatures, low humidity, strong winds, and little rain.
Richard Betts, one of the co-writers of the review, stated that 'Australia is particularly vulnerable to fires since its land area has warmed by more than the rise in global temperature of about one degree Celsius since pre-industrial times.' But despite the significant amount of scientific evidence that climate change has created the conditions which have allowed these fires to start, the Australian government is determined to avoid taking any real action to stop climate change.

"It was not time to talk about climate change before the bushfires, it was not time to talk about climate change during the bushfires, and it will not to be time to talk about climate change after the bushfires. So when will it be time to talk about the climate crisis?"


Morrison, Berejiklian and their governments have called for discussions on climate change to be put on hold in the wake of the bushfires. Berejiklian has refused to link climate change to the bushfires. In a 2019 interview with the Advertiser she said that 'these fires are the cause of extreme weather conditions, but also the deep, dry conditions, the drought conditions ... it is a combination of factors that we need to look at.' Berejiklian has also labelled questions regarding climate change during the fires as 'disappointing'
It was not time to talk about climate change before the bushfires, it was not time to talk about climate change during the bushfires, and it will not to be time to talk about climate change after the bushfires. So when will it be time to talk about the climate crisis? When it's economically profitable, of course!
Both Morrison and Berejiklian seem primarily concerned with the creation and preservation of jobs in the Australian mining economy, because historically the mining industry has been excellent for the Australian economy. But if saving the planet was going to make the country incredibly rich, then we might have a different story on our hands.
Until such time as climate change stops people from being able to act as a consumer or as a worker, any action taken to prevent it will be considered bad for the economy. Ultimately, we must discuss climate change as soon as possible, because as it stands, it is the poor who do not have the infrastructure to deal with the effects of climate change who will be most devastatingly affected.
I fear that Australian farmers and rural communities, as well as international communities in poor countries, will have their lives ruined before we as a nation begin to have these important conversations about climate change.
So when will it is time to talk about climate change? I fear it will be once it is too late.


Gracie RyanGracie Ryan is a young writer who can often be found hunched over her laptop fussing over comma placement and line spacing. She is deeply passionate about the environment and upholding human rights.


Main image: Protestors holding placards look on on 20 September 2019 at the climate strike in Melbourne. (Photo by Asanka Ratnayake/Getty Images)

No comments:

Post a Comment