Thursday, 7 May 2020

Australians look at American gun culture in disbelief. But our pasts aren't so dissimilar

,
People in militia clothes with guns stand outside a door in a stately building
A Michigan militia group stands in front of the Governor's office to protest stay-at-home orders.(Reuters: Seth Herald)

They were scenes that shocked even those who thought they had a good understanding of US gun culture.
Some came armed with assault weapons and ammunition belts.
It was if they were getting ready to invade a small country instead of just taking part in what was, in the end, largely a peaceful demonstration.
As it turns out, the constitutional right to bear arms is particularly sweeping in Michigan.

Directly above me, men with rifles yelling at us. Some of my colleagues who own bullet proof vests are wearing them. I have never appreciated our Sergeants-at-Arms more than today.

View image on Twitter

It is perfectly legal to carry weapons in public spaces in that state, mainly because there aren't any laws in place explicitly saying you can't.
Therefore, the hands of local police were tied.
Can you imagine similar scenes at any of Australia's state parliament houses? Of course, we never have to. Gun ownership is not as entrenched in Australia.
But, as a new book explains, that hasn't always been the case.
Space to play or pause, M to mute, left and right arrows to seek, up and down arrows for volume.
Anti-lockdown protesters crowd inside Michigan State Capitol

Australian and US paths converge

Under Fire: How Australia's Violent History Led To Gun Control by Hobart-based historian Nick Brodie takes us on a journey through this country's violent past.
It presents a few sliding door moments where we took a radically different path to America when it comes to gun ownership. And a lot of them came well before Port Arthur.Australia's gun buyback scheme
As well as tougher laws, a gun buyback scheme was introduced in the wake of the Port Arthur massacre.(Supplied)
Gunfire did mark many of our most significant moments, starting with Captain Cook's landing party in April 1770 firing on two Indigenous men on the shores of Botany Bay.
"Guns were crucial in terms of affecting the colonial project," notes Brodie.
"Not just the technological advantage they provided the settlers, which enabled them to win war after war, but they also used the law of gun restriction against Aboriginal people to deny them the ability to carry guns and fight back on the same terms."
The ban on Indigenous people owning guns was part and parcel of the wider process of systematic dispossession, just as firearms were integral to maintaining order in the new European settlement.
A painting of Captain Cook surrounded by his fleet.
Guns have been a feature of Australia's history since the moment Captain Cook arrived.(Supplied: Wikipedia Commons)
It is here the histories of Australia and the US converge.
Both countries have colonial origins with violent beginnings.
Gun ownership in Australia in the early days was widespread. In fact, as Brodie points out, the powerful US National Rifle Association was predated by similar associations in the Australian colonies in the middle of the 19th Century.
The idea was British subjects "should be ready to bear arms for the nation".

US once led the way in gun control

Our gun-toting histories collided during the goldrush of the 1850s with the arrival to Australia of a number of well-armed Californians who proceeded to get on the wrong side of the law.
Guns were freely used as weapons of self-defence on the goldfields, with bushrangers always on the prowl.
Australia was a country awash with firearms, and it wasn't long before legislatures sought to impose gun control measures. Some worked. Others were simply ignored.Nerrigundah shootout sketch
This captures the moment bushranger William Fletcher was killed in a shootout with constables in 1861.(Supplied: Illustrated Sydney News)
Gun ownership jumped dramatically at the end of the First World War, when the Diggers came home with their trusted pistols.
Brodie says there was a national "pistol crisis", with criminal elements quickly getting their hands on the guns.
A select committee was assembled to investigate the problem, and it even heard from a US diplomatic consul who pointed to the gun-licencing regime in New York as a model for the Australians to consider.
What followed this outbreak of gun violence, and others in subsequent decades, were even tighter gun laws.
Brodie says the gun cultures in Australia and the US really started diverging after the Second World War.
"But after World War II, the major gun manufacturers turned assault weapons into hunting rifles, and so there's a big market element there.
"Because Australia doesn't have gun manufacturers on the same level, it is a bit of a different story."
A culture of gun violence grew in America while Australia largely went the other way.
The trauma of Port Arthur ushered in sweeping new gun laws as well as a widely successful gun amnesty and buy-back scheme.
Space to play or pause, M to mute, left and right arrows to seek, up and down arrows for volume.
Tim Fischer discusses gun reforms ahead of Port Arthur 20th anniversary memorial
It was during those dark days after the massacre that Brodie says the nation agreed, "The age of the firearm had to end".
All of which brings us back to the armed militia in Michigan.
Looking at our shared histories with guns, it appears Australia stepped back from the brink.

No comments:

Post a Comment