'Crackpot stuff': Coalition MPs' call for nuclear power inquiry rejected by Greens

Extract from The Guardian

Energy

Sarah Hanson-Young says the Nationals who have raised nuclear energy are ‘lunatic cowboys’

Sarah Martin Chief political correspondent

Wed 5 Jun 2019 04.00 AEST Last modified on Wed 5 Jun 2019 04.02 AEST

Sarah Hanson-Young has rejected any move to overturn Australia’s nuclear ban, saying nuclear power is expensive and would take a decade to build. Photograph: Kelly Barnes/AAP

The Greens have labelled Coalition MPs pushing for an inquiry into nuclear power as “lunatic cowboys”, pledging to block any move to overturn Australia’s nuclear ban in the Senate.
As conservative MPs move to establish a Senate inquiry into nuclear power when parliament returns next month, the Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young has invited the former Nationals leader Barnaby Joyce to debate her in the “town he thinks it should be built”.
“Talk of overturning the ban on nuclear power in Australia is crackpot stuff,” Hanson-Young, who is the party’s environment spokesperson, said.
“Aside from being a dangerous technology, nuclear power is wildly expensive and would take a decade or more to build.
“It would be a funny joke if it wasn’t so embarrassing to have the Nationals, who are in government and who sit around the cabinet table, pushing for this.

“These people are meant to be in charge, and they’re running around like a bunch of lunatic cowboys.”
The comments from the Greens come after Queenslanders Keith Pitt and James McGrath indicated they would push for a select committee into nuclear power in the first week of parliamentary sittings in July, saying technology has changed since the country last reviewed its prospects in 2006.
Pitt said nuclear energy was used by more than 30 countries around the world, and Australia’s adoption of the technology could boost economic activity and lower power prices.
“I think we should look at every chance we have to provide those benefits to the Australian people,” Pitt told ABC on Tuesday.
When asked where the plant should be built, the Queensland MP said the first step was to consider whether it was “actually feasible”.
“Scare campaigns from the Labor party are always focused on whose backyard will it be in. We need to stop that and have an adult conversation with the Australian people.”
The New South Wales deputy premier, John Barilaro, has also thrown his support behind the nuclear push, saying despite the debate over emissions reduction the nuclear “solution” was seen as too “politically risky”.

“Now is the right time for Australia to begin a mature and fact-filled conversation on the benefits of nuclear energy,” Barilaro said.
The Australian Nuclear Association has supported the new inquiry, saying deep cuts to emissions would be best achieved with nuclear power, with the technology cost competitive with coal and gas if carbon pollution is priced.
The association’s Robert Parker said removing the ban on nuclear power that currently exists in the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act would enable industry to start negotiations with suppliers about building a nuclear power plant at the lowest possible cost.
But Hanson-Young said the Greens would be pushing to strengthen the EPBC Act and would fight any moves to water down the ban on nuclear.
“We need stronger environment laws that continue the ban on nuclear energy,” Hanson-Young said.

“Nuclear energy is an old technology that Australia doesn’t need and has outgrown. We are moving toward a renewable energy future. It’s happening, it’s here and the government should be enabling it, not trying to revisit a dangerous and outdated technology.”